Cinematical

Agree 100%. Maybe Ebert didn't get his "special envelope" from Spielberg? The issues that Ebert raises are pretty darn nick-picky, even for him. After all, if you're going to get all "Science Fiction Fan" etc. then you should start talking about how true the film is to the book, etc. etc... Not about how much "sense" it makes in some absolute way. I just got the feeling that the movie was cut poorly. It lacked some important transitional and expository scenes, but those scenes would have slowed down the "ride." So, Roger should have read the book, then seen the movie, and relaxed and enjoyed it.

Reply

If Ebert meant to say, "WOTW is a great but flawed film," then I'd agree with him. Spielberg's talent usually shines so brightly that people tend to let some of his sloppiness slide; for instance, the apparent script hole related to Cruise's teenage son character, which I suspect had a fuller portraiture in one of the drafts of the screenplay, but someone, likely Spielberg, decided to reduce him to a hothead who is conveniently, and very sloppily, made to disappear halfway through the movie and miraculously pop back up again later. Another example, I think the survivalist character played by Tim Robbins is totally unnecessary -- Cruise and Fanning need a place to duck into, they can easily find an empty basement without anybody in it; the presence of the survivalist does not add to the tension of the scene, which is basically to introduce the snake-like tentacle and the aliens. I will say this: Dakota Fanning has such a mesmerizing presence that it's possible the fact that her performance outclasses those by Chatwin and Robbins has, to me, rendered the latter two characters ineffective.

Reply

I think the survivalist (Tim Robbins' character) was really important and the scene wouldn't have been as effective without him. His acting was so spot on, as usual for Tim Robbins, and I think he was neccessary to the film. I definitely think the ending was way to cheesy but overall the movie was great! It stayed so close to the book (as much as they could anyway) and was immensely enjoyable. I don't see what everybody's bitching about with this movie. Sure Tom Cruise has gone crazy but I still think he acted really well in the movie.

Reply

WAR OF THE WORLDS IS A GREAT MOVIE! THIS IS THE BEST MOVIE THAT I'VE SEEN SINCE DAY AFTER TOMORROW....
TOM CRUISE DID A GOOD JOB BEING A GREAT ACTOR IN THIS MOVIE! I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS MOVIE 4 STARS!!!!!!!!

Reply

Last time I checked, Ebert's title is "Movie Critic", not "Movie Cheerleader". The man is paid to criticize, not to heap praises on a film that has been praised to the skies. Ebert's harshness on WOTW is understandable, because his action is akin to a teacher chiding the best and brightest student in the class for handing in an A-minus school assignment. Spielberg is a cinematic genius who brought us masterpieces such as "Schindler's List", "Jaws", "Saving Private Ryan", "Close Encounters", "E. T.", but he also gave us less stellar works like "A. I." and "Minority Report" (let's not even talk about "1941"), and Ebert is simply saying, "Look, Steven, you can do better," and I agree with him. In WOTW, the "mysterious gap" in Chatwin's character and the jaw-dropping sappy ending are indefensible. And the justification for writing in that survivalist character is dubious, but let's give Spielberg the benefit of the doubt, because it's his movie. Still, I maintain that the whole scene with Robbins is botched, and Robbins is definitely not to blame. On paper, the casting of the survivalist calls for "an eccentric loner" type, and in my opinion, actors like Sean Penn, Jack Nicholson, Billy Bob Thornton, Al Pacino (I could go on and on) would do a better job. Instead, we now see Tim Robbins with a hood over his head running around in a dimly lit basement doing nothing more than lifting up a glass of moonshine, an ax, and a shotgun.

Reply

I hadn't really planned on seeing this movie, but after reading this post, I decided to go check it out. I have to say, I pretty much agree with Mr. Scrietta. There was a lot to like about this movie, and some of the camera work was very impressive. The ending was a let down, but almost all of the movie really delivered on the excitement scale. To me, this movie does a good job of keeping the repeated "skin of their teeth" escapes from feeling tedious.

I wish I had gone to see the movie during the day, perhaps the theatre would've been less full. Bascially the entire movie people were getting up and down and going in and out of the doors. Also several people brought very young kids (4-6 years, i'm guessing), which (as a parent) seemed pretty inappropriate. One poor girl had to be carried out of the theatre by what I assume was her dad, and she did not look happy.

Reply

the movie really sucks, i don't know why i wasted my laundry money to go see it.

Reply

No one will probably read this now because this post is a couple days old, but I just saw the movie and really enjoyed it. Well, maybe enjoyed it isn't quite the right word. I thought it was a great moviegoing experience.

What I thought was most amazing about the film was that for the first half of the movie or so, I felt like I was experiencing the terror and uncertainty of September 11 all over again, except that the destruction was being carried out by aliens instead of terrorists. The desperation and fear that people experience throughout the movie really transfers to the audience -- at least to this audience member. The part where the family's car is surrounded by survivors who are demanding the car, for instance, was truly chilling.

Spielberg really seems to have taken the lessons from Saving Private Ryan -- immersing the audience in a hellish situation to the point it seems real -- and applied them to the alien invasion scenario. Yeah, the ending was rushed and didn't really make sense, but overall I came away much more satisfied than I thought I was going to be. An impressive effort from Spielberg.

Reply

yup, excellent acting all round.. even us in the trade would agree!... but i wish the girl would stop screaming for a few minutes, please!!!! :D

Reply