War of the Worlds: Final Thoughts
Filed under: Action, Drama, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Thrillers, Tom Cruise, Steven Spielberg
.jpg)
I always liked Watch the Skies, the original title of Close Encounters of the Third Kind. Sadly, that wouldn't have been an appropriate title for this movie. Instead of raining ruin from above, the aliens in War of the Worlds come barrelling up from underneath our feet. It's a good gimmick, suggesting the commencement of a well-laid plan, instead of the whim of space-bullies on holiday. Still, as many critics have noted, it's perplexing. They planned this surprise thousands of years ago and they chose Newark and Osaka as launching points? Did Ur or Babylonia make the cut?
There are a few things that Spielberg got exactly right, such as the opening of the film. It works on a gut-level because the aliens simply appear and start thwonking people with lasers, without a song and dance. They are, in fact, disturbingly utilitarian. They disorient their game with cacophonous foghorns and use spotlights to track anyone scurrying along the ground. Much like the shark in Jaws, these aliens are simply a problem to be solved, not anything that can be communicated with.
As a conception, the alien jalopies are the natural outgrowth of a 19th century futurist’s imagination. Their stilted but forceful locomotion suggests a writer who was trying to imagine what lever and pulley technology would be like for a more advanced civilization. The spindly, creaky spider-legs also seem laughably ill-suited for a seek and destroy mission, which it makes it more interesting on a visual level.
Tom Cruise plays Ray, an almost-middle-aged father who happens to be in the wrong intersection when one of these knobby-kneed jellyfish rise from under the city streets. He finds himself part of a mob rushing to safety, while people to his left and right are turned into standing suits of clothes. One woman is disintegrated directly in front of him, and he charges through her silhouette, becoming covered in people-patina. From then on, it’s an escape movie, which it clearly should be.
Spielberg also nails the fact that guns would come into play immediately, and anything that wasn’t nailed down would be up for grabs. I wasn’t expecting this from the man who actually went back and replaced the shotguns in E.T. with flashlights. He underlines how unhelpful the general public would be to anyone who was trying to make headway in this situation. In fact, he probably underestimates the on-spot organization that might spring up to commandeer public utilities. There would probably be a ground war to get on every ferry, and a war to take over every airport, and so on.
As someone who is afflicted with a mild phobia of crowds, I found the scenes of post-invasion panic more disturbing than the alien tripods themselves. It wouldn't take much for this society to wave toodle-oo to civil order in the event of even a significant natural disaster, so it's impossible to estimate the aftermath of an uber-event such as the arrival of alien death squads. That’s why I think the ferry sequence is probably the film’s best. It’s just a barrage of grasping hands, gun butts, screaming and bad decisions.
The military is noticeably out to lunch in this movie too, which sounds about right. There would surely be mass desertion and chaos in the ranks, even if a counter-offensive could be realized. But why do the army battalions roam the countryside with Abrams tanks and shoulder-launchers? I don’t think it takes a Napoleon-level military genius to see that this is going to be a different kind of war. Here’s a tip: if you are the President and the world is suddenly invaded by an interstellar Einstatzgruppen, you better start pushing those big red buttons like Fred Savage in The Wizard.
My biggest complaint with the film involves an extended hide-and-seek sequence, in which a gaggle of survivors try to evade an alien probe that is searching for them in the cellar of a farmhouse. The transfer of perspective is too abrupt here. We’ve just seen cities being stomped by thousand foot-high oysters on stilts. It’s impossible to believe that the same invaders would employ tiny, prowling search drones to play games in basements. It implies that their plan will not be realized unless every single human is wiped out in this attack. If that’s the case, they are going to be here a while.
On the other hand, I enjoyed Tim Robbins’ performance as a survivalist fruit-loop who invites Cruise and company into his dilapidated farmhouse and then reveals that he plans to escape the aliens by digging a tunnel through his basement floor with a shovel. Robbins has a knack for playing crazies, as evidenced by his stellar work in that George Lucas masterpiece, Howard the Duck. He should do this kind of work more often.
Critics have lambasted the film’s ending, which is faithful to the original novel. It implies spectacularly bad planning on the part of the aliens, but I think it works fine. The novel was written during a period when Victorian women were swooning and retreating en masse into their boudoirs with unexplainable psychosomatic illness, and disease itself was not something that could be "fought" in any meaningful way. Taking the source material a hundred years forward might have been the wrong-headed idea. I don’t see why we couldn’t have a straight rendition of the novel.
I think we all know by now that the glory days of Spielberg are behind him. There will never be another Jaws, no matter how much you may wish it so. And he’s not going to go away. He will go on making so-so adventure movies in between his so-so prestige projects, because we have invested him with movie immortality. It will be much like with Alfred Hitchcock, who was granted the license to make mediocre films for the last twenty years of his life. Oh well. At least we have the next Indiana Jones movie to look forward to. That’s going to be great, right? Right?









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-05-2005 @ 11:26AM
Tony said...
"It’s impossible to believe that the same invaders would employ tiny, prowling search drones to play games in basements. It implies that their plan will not be realized unless every single human is wiped out in this attack. If that’s the case, they are going to be here a while."
Seemed to me that scene was about the aliens checking to see if it was safe to come out of their vehicle and poke around. If I recall, they also seemed to drink some of the water that was in the basement. They looked pretty vulnerable outside of their tripods.
Reply
7-05-2005 @ 12:38PM
Sundroid said...
I disagree with the assumption that Spielberg's glory days are over. Although I'm disappointed in War of the Worlds, I think his next movie, the yet to be titled film about the 1972 massacre of Israeli athletes in Munich Olympics and the subsequent revenge killing by Mossad agents, will change some people's minds. From what I have read so far, Spielberg is again entering the territory of cinematic depth, sophistication, and pure art which he triumphed in "Schindler's List". Let's wait until "Untitled Munich Project" comes out before concluding whether this cinematic wunderkind has lost his touch or not.
One more observation: Spielberg must be the "king of a multitasking" in movie industry -- one hears the story about how he worked on "Jurassic Park" and "Schindler's List" simultaneously. I'd like think that his sloppy work in WOTW is the result of his devotion to "Untitled Munich Project", which I have already reserved a seat in my neighborhood theater for.
Reply
7-05-2005 @ 1:52PM
DigitalStupor said...
"We’ve just seen cities being stomped by thousand foot-high oysters on stilts."
Hilarious...I agree, the film transfers from a desperate escape from devastation to intimate tentacle avoidance (in a scene all to reminiscient of the water-tentacle in "The Abyss". Howeverr, when the tentacle eye catches them in the middle of sleep, it was pretty frightening! You would think the giant clam machine would have lost interest in the beat up farm house after a few hours...but NO, it had to find something down there! After all, the aliens found pictures and a bicycle on the wall.
I have to agree, the ferry scene is one of my favorites. The combination of mass panic when everybody tries to take over the van Cruise is driving, to the scene when the tripod finds the throngs of people in the valley below waiting to board the ferry is pretty memorable. Just when the masses were taking a short breather from the attacks (set up with Cruise and family meet an old friend and her daughter), the aliens climb up and over the hill and remind Cruise that "oh yeah, aliens are chasing everyone, so GOTTA GO!". I'm not quite sure if formal introductions would be the first thing on my mind in this situation, and I doubt a polite smile would be on my face.
Reply
7-05-2005 @ 4:49PM
gt said...
"It’s impossible to believe that the same invaders would employ tiny, prowling search drones to play games in basements. It implies that their plan will not be realized unless every single human is wiped out in this attack. If that’s the case, they are going to be here a while."
Thank you! I thought I was the only one...I mean I would understand if they looked down there and gave the green light or whatever but it kept looking around, even during the movie I am like "come on let's move on!" it also confused me because I was like isn't it smarter than just relying on vision, it hears noises and thinks nothing of it? no infrared or nothing, right. how come more people didnt go into the basement too?
and the abyss reference, spot on! i knew it reminded me of something.
people are raving about the train on fire but i didnt quite get that.
the guy opening the windshield with his bar hands was the best, hands down.
Reply
7-05-2005 @ 5:06PM
clankobot said...
I think it's a little strange that a civilization so advanced wouldn't keep tabs on a planet to make sure just being there wouldn't kill them first. It was also weird that they used incredibly powerful lasers to inefficiently kill people one at a time. Wouldn't a bomb of some sort have a higher yield? And if they needed the people for fertilizer, why obliterate them in the first place?
Reply
7-06-2005 @ 7:15PM
Venkat said...
I liked your final thoughts on War of the Worlds and believe you make some valid points, but I also think we are seeing a different Spielberg. This isn't the innocent man who could make movies just for pure unadulterated fun - this is the world weary 50+ man who has a lot to say about the state of affairs and I think thats coming through in his work. I read into War of the Worlds as a rendition of the holocaust on a major scale (see the massacre without reason, the number of refugees that look like theyve come out of Schindler's List, and the ultimate downfall in one quick swoop.) However there is no "real" ending to it because I think Spielberg believes Jews are still being persecuted and the messiah for them has not yet arrived - their world has been shattered, but still life exists on a molecular level. I don't think Raiders of the Lost Ark or E.T. had any of these serious undertones. I enjoyed the film immensely. As for Spielberg being past his prime - well yes he won't make the completely joyous fun movie anymore (even Indy 4 will have its share of seriousness) but I think we can expect him to craft artistically challenging and powerful films that deal with human emotion - dare I say it - Indy 4 could be his last properly enjoyable venture - I look forward to seeing more Schindler's List's from him.
Reply
9-15-2005 @ 11:55PM
John Warner said...
Wether or not you like the 'soft' ending, or the tentacle probe searching in the basement is kind of a moot point. If you paid to go on this ride, then a ride is what you got. There's no way anyone dozed off or found themselves going over a grocery list. This movie does exactly what it sets out to do and that's enthrall, scare, astound audiences, and take them for a hair raising, grab your seats ride. You may have to pay for that whole seat, but you'll only need the edge!
Reply