Let's make money off 9/11
Filed under: Drama, Casting, Deals, Paramount, Scripts
Paramount Pictures has announced an untitled feature film about the rescue of two Port Authority police officers from the rubble of the World Trade Center. Variety reports that Oliver Stone will direct and Nicolas Cage will star. Andrea Berloff, who wrote the 2002 film Domestic and the upcoming remake of Don't Look Now,
has written the script. Cage will portray one of the two Port Authority
police officers, Will Jimeno and John McLoughlin, who were among the
many rescuers who risked their lives rushing into the buildings.Columbia Pictures is also hard at work on a 9/11 film based on the Jim Dwyer-Kevin Flynn book "102 Minutes." Billy Ray, the writer and director of Shattered Glass, has turned in a first draft which the studio seems to like. The book follows the rescue attempts that took place between the moment the first plane hit the World Trade Center at 8:46 am. and the collapse of the first tower at 10:28 am.
Question to the readers: So is it now okay to make a 9/11 movie? If so, why? What if it was a fictional tale taking place during the events and not based on a real-life story?










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-08-2005 @ 3:27PM
Tyler J. Smith said...
I'll answer the question with another question.....
Is it ok to make movies based on World War II, in the same light? Even if it's a fictional character? They tell the tail of American history - why should this be any different?
In my opinion, I think it's a little unsensitive, but we all know they'll produce a movie sooner or later. I would think it is ok, so long as all anti-Muslim politics and pro-American politics are left out of it, or else they'd better plan on this movie only being recieved in the United States (and perhaps Britain, now) for some type of profit.
Reply
7-12-2005 @ 10:50PM
kris said...
why not? they make movies about the Holocaust.
Reply
7-11-2005 @ 1:54PM
phantomprophet said...
Not yet. Too soon.
WWII is okay 'cause it was a long time ago yet recent enough to be rememberd by some.
I know I listen intensly to my grandfathers stories of WWII, but 9/11 is too fresh, hell, it isn't even really over yet. We are still hunting for Bin Ladin.
I think they need to give it more time.
Reply
7-08-2005 @ 4:24PM
Ash said...
Yes, right after WW2 the studio's made u boats of cash. But, the real films that too a serious look at the war did not come out for many years to follow. These films are just going to be puff pieces made to make America feel happy about itself. A pat on the back in film form. It is only our own fault that the films are going to make millions upon millions. Our fault that we are not making anything more serious or demanding anything with more content than a compliment.
Reply
7-08-2005 @ 4:31PM
cel said...
haven't we been telling stories about 9/11 since the moment the first plane crashed into the trade center?
anyway, i think there was a collection of images prepared by comic book artists sometime soon after the terrorist attacks (artistic impressions of the event). i can't imagine how many books have been written. we're swamped with television programs about it all. why not a ficitonal film?
we mediate tragedy, farce, cruelty, and everything wonderful and aweful through the fictional stories we tell. why not this too?
i just hope the film has some credible depth and artistic ambition.
cel
Reply
7-09-2005 @ 2:03AM
paintist said...
what makes you think that a movie based on the 9/11 is "new" Have you seen the "The Guys"? Or that huge collaboration with directors all around the world making short films about the 9/11 repurcussions?
Hell did you even check imdb?
http://imdb.com/List?tv=on&&keywords=september-11-2001&&heading=19;september-11-2001
Reply
7-11-2005 @ 10:16AM
Tom Ford said...
I think it's ok for Stone/Cage to do a mainstream movie about 9/11. "The Guys" starred Anthony LaPaglia, but was not widely publicized, as I heard about it for the first time this weekend.
I trust Oliver Stone to make a good movie, and I am never disappointed by Nic Cage.
As far as the $$$ aspects, if people don't want to spend the money on it, or don't want to give people cash for fictionalizing that tragedy, they simply won't go to the film. Remember all the movies that were released recently that capitalized on military events: Saving Private Ryan, Black Hawk Down, Pearl Harbor (which stunk, but hey)
Reply