Christian Slater refuses plea deal - BREAKING!
Filed under: Celebrities and Controversy
At a hearing this morning on charges that he groped a woman in a New York bodega, Christian Slater rejected a plea deal from prosecutors, and will now have to return to court on September 19. The plea would have entailed Slater pleading guilty to "second-degree harassment", and pledging to perform three days worth of community service. His lawyer insists they'll instead work to have the charges thrown out. My question is: what are all the different degrees of harassment? What about the guy on the corner who asks me to "have babies" with him as I pass by every morning on my way to the coffee place? How much community service can we force him into?
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-14-2005 @ 2:46PM
truthseeker said...
Another sick star treatment. First Michael continues practicing his deviences in Bahrain and now Slatter is going to be found not guilty.
I cannot wait to become a star myself; that way I can cup Slatter's balls with my hands while I poke him from behind. As far as Michael is concerned he will be the one sitting in my lap riding horsy until he cries out of joy. Oops I meant to say IN & OUT of joy.
I do not care who I offended this time. I suppose I am offending myself for having to speak my mind and lower myself to this level.
Movie stars....... Yuk.
Reply
7-14-2005 @ 2:41PM
Cameron N. said...
Christian Slater is a sex offender and should be treated as one. Groping women in public is a form of sex offense known as frotage. He should serve the appropriate prison time and also receive mandatory therapy.
Reply
7-14-2005 @ 5:05PM
Ash said...
I say, go Slater, fight the power, Pump Up The Volume. As far as the "have babies" thing, that is verbal harrasment. I am pretty sure that is prosecutable. I was prosecuted for calling a girl a whore when I was 17. It was a deferred sentence as long as I didn't get into trouble for a year, but, it still sucked. So I think you could at least get that.
Reply