New Releases: Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
Filed under: Sci-Fi & Fantasy, New Releases, Warner Brothers, Theatrical Reviews, Family Films

I was really worried about seeing Tim Burton's Charlie and the Chocolate Factory - what if I hated it? Could I ever forgive Burton and Johnny Depp for mucking up one of my most beloved childhood memories? But I needn't have worried. Burton's version of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is a sublime sugarplum of a remake, and I enjoyed it from beginning to end.
Depp (and let me just disclose upfront that he is one of my very favorite actors, and I've liked him in almost every film he's ever done) is the only current actor I could envision taking on the role made famous by Gene Wilder, and he does so with verity. I've heard people say they think Burton's version is less dark than the original; I don't see that, myself. While this film is not, perhaps, as shadowy as one might hope and expect from a Burton film, it's certainly not all sunshine and sugar-coated light. Depp plays Wonka with a slighty psychotic and off-kilter edge, heavily evoking Edward Scissorhands and Ed Wood, but tempered by a child-like innocence. Kinda like Michael Jackson, but without the creepiness.
Depp was not the only actor vying for the coveted role. Michael Keaton, Nicolas Cage, Christopher Walken, Steve Martin and Robin Williams were all reportedly considered, and goth-rocker Marilyn Manson is said to have badly wanted the part. Depp, in fact, is rumored to have modeled his Wonka after Manson. Depp ultimately makes the role his own, though, bringing a depth and quirky thoughtfulness to the role that pays homage to Wilder's version of Wonka without mirroring it. Burton was also not the only director attached to the film; Martin Scorsese was also attached at one point (now that would have been a very different film!).
Freddie Highmore, who plays Charlie, ups the ante on his excellent turn in Depp's Finding Neverland with an absolutely flawless performance. Depp convinced Burton to hire Highmore for the role after working with him on Neverland. Highmore's Charlie Bucket is absolutely believeable and so earnest and likeable, you just wanted to cheer out loud for him when he finally found that coveted final Golden Ticket. Memo to Shark Boy and Lava Girl director Robert Rodriguez: This is a child actor - one who can actually act. Next time you direct a movie, you might try to find one.
It is winter, and cold and gray and snowing in the real world where Charlie and his family live in a one-room shack on watery cabbage soup. Inside Wonka's fortress of a chocolate factory, all is a cacophony of Oz-like saturated color. All the familiar characters are there: piggish chocoholic Augustus Gloop (Philip Wiegratz), bad nut Veruca Salt (Julia Winter), hyper-competitive Violet Beauragard (Annasophia Robb, showing off her acting chops here in a big departure from her previous sweetness-and-light roles) and rude, brainiac video game addict Mike Teavee (Jordan Fry).
Of these young actors, only Robb has prior acting credits, but they all turned in nice performances; Winter especially I expect to see more of. Robb had the strongest performance of the four, playing the contemptable Violet flawlessly. Film vet David Kelly puts his nearly 50 years of experience to good use, playing Charlie's beloved Grandpa Joe to perfection.
The film moves along at a fairly lively clip, and there are many subtly funny moments targeted more at the adults in the crowd than the kids. My favorite line? When Depp deadpans, "Everything here is eatable. I'm eatable, but that, my children, is called cannibalism and it is frowned upon in most societies."
The special effects, of course, have the advantage over the original, with the advent of computers and digitization, and they rock - but then again, Wonka's factory looked scrumptious in the original too. Everything from the grass to the candy apples to the chocolate river and waterfall looks good enough to eat.
As for the directing, well, I've long been convinced that Tim Burton is either a genius or certifiably insane. Certainly he has a particular way of looking at the world that is unique in the realm of filmmaking, and you couldn't ask for a more appropriate choice of director to remake this film. Just imagine this film in the hands of Robert Rodriguez (Look! It's Charlie and the Chocolate Factory - in 3-D! - Glasses on!), and you'll more fully appreciate the sense and sensibility Burton brings to this film. The score, by Danny Elfman, is absolutely perfect - some of his best work, and Elfman has done a lot of good music for films.
The Oompa Loompas (played by diminuitve actor Deep Roy and his digitized clones) kind of creeped me out, as they did in the original movie, but hey, they're supposed to creep you out. We get to learn a little more about the Oompa Loompas and how they came to live in the chocolate factory, and the songs and dances, especially the one where they're dressed up in 80s glamour rock, had the grown-ups in the theater howling.
I don't always watch my fellow filmgoers while I'm watching a film, but in this case I couldn't help sneaking peeks around to gauge the reactions of the other adults to the film. The kids loved it, of course, but the real test was the adults. Pretty much everyone around me was mesmerized - laughing out loud at the dialouge and the Oompa Loompas, intrigued by Depp's performance.
We get to learn more about Willy Wonka's sweet-deprived background in Burton's version, with a storyline about Wonka's childhood (created specifically for this film, with the ever-fabulous Christopher Lee in the role Of Dr. Wonka, a dentist) that both drives and explains Wonka as Depp portrays him. I'm not sure this was a good choice - I think I would have preferred the whys and wherefores of Wonka's oddness to remain a mystery, and this is one of the few things I didn't like about the film.
Burton may be guilty of having a bit too much of a sweet-tooth about the ending, especially for fans who are expecting it to end on a more melancholy and bittersweet note, but the film, overall, is spectacular, and left me wanting to see it again and again. Catch this one at the theater to see it in all its technicolor glory on the big screen, then buy it when it comes out on DVD, because you, and your kids, will want to see this one many times. It may not supplant Wilder and Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory from your heart, but it certainly deserves a place right alongside it.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-18-2005 @ 2:44PM
Dorian Innes said...
I dunno who paid off Kim for this fluff piece, or even how stoned she was, but let me assure you, it is nothing that she is making it out to be. If youve seen the original you're in for a very long and disappointing surprise.
First, the characters are flat as boards. You hate and don't believe almost every single one of them. All the kids, you just can't wait until they're nixed, and when they are, you dont even care enough about them to laugh at them getting their just deserts.
She hit it right on the nose about Depp being just like Michael Jackson, but "without the creepiness"? Add twice as much of creep as Michael Jackson and you get Depp's version of Wonka. Add to that John August's horrible attempt at biting and scathing comments to his winners ala the original and you've got even more reason to throw up your hands in disgust.
and lastly, the songs. They played a very heavy role in the original, having children and adults singing along just because they were so damn catchy. In Burton's version, the songs are utter crap. Half the time you can't even hear what the vinyl-suit clad ommpa's are singing. Come on, they did a friggin rock song. It was horrible. And you can see the songs coming a mile away. The movie's flow was terrible. The original just flows so well and natural into song that you cant see the tape holding the cuts together.
This movie reads like a cookbook on how to f*ck up a brilliant original. I'm not ashamed for Burton cus he always does this, but Depp really walked into a mud puddle and came out filthy. I like him a lot and I absolutely hated this movie. I hate to sound like an ass, but I saw Herbie (dont ask) and i swear on the life of my mother that it was better and more believable than Wonka.
Reply
7-18-2005 @ 6:37PM
Conrad Quilty-Harper said...
I can't wait to see this movie, purely to see how Depp acted. I've seen the original and I don't think i'll care if Burton isn't faithful to it. Quite frankly I don't think the original was that amazing. The book was much much better than the film.
Reply
7-18-2005 @ 8:26PM
steve said...
I thought the original was a very good movie HOWEVER this is not a remake of the original it is a much more accurate adaptation of the book. If you love Roald Dahl you will love this movie, Burton has interpreted the book in a way that I beleive, according to reports from Dahl's family, he would have loved. This movie shouldn't be compared to the previous adaptation. But seeing how other commentators are:
Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory was a vehicle for Wilder, taking elements of the book , but concentrating on him, which was why Selzer rewrote Dahls original script and changed Wilder's dialogue to more literary and Shakespearian quotations that would befit a "star". Charlie and The Chocolate Factory tells the original story of the book
You are not supposed to like the other kids characters, but that is the same as the Willy wonka Movie! Willy wonka and Charlie have a real connection in this movie that wasn't there in the Wilder version, the entire juvenile cast gave excellent performances, and if anything the "parents" were the only letdown in the modern version.
The lyrics for the songs in this movie were written by Dahl and are far more appropraiate than the previous "musicalised" version, I mean, "Pure Imagination"??? almost as laughable as "Cheer Up Charlie" and "I've got a Golden Ticket"!!! Hardly sing-a-long songs! This is a modern movie and the music was appropriate for the current audience.
Don't let the Wonka Nazis put you off from seeing this movie,for sheer honest to goodness entertainment it is the best movie I have seen this year.
Reply
7-20-2005 @ 8:48AM
TDavid said...
I like Road Dahl, but with the notable exception of the squirrels for the golden goose I found this movie to be utter trash. The reviewer likes it as does a bunch of the Rotten Tomatoes critics, but I think it would have been much better to make the sequel so there was less comparison to the classic.
Reply
7-20-2005 @ 4:28PM
Kailey said...
I really appreciate what the reporters said about this movie and I agree with everything they said! and ANYONE who DIDN'T LIKE it can GO TO HELL!!!
Reply
7-20-2005 @ 4:42PM
Kailey said...
To: DORIAN INNES-
I can't believe that you could even say that Johnny or "Willy Wonka" is creepier than mike Jackson!
First of all- Willy Wonka's supposed to be creepy!
Second- you can't ever expect any remake of anything to be exactly like the original- just look at today's music industry!
Third- At least Johnny's being HIMSELF, and that's what makes him so interesting to watch!
Reply
8-14-2005 @ 12:54PM
Tracey said...
This version is soooo much better than the classic one as it has more laughs and an even better cast. We get to see excellent performances from the young Freddie Highmore, Great musical Dances from the Oompa Lumpas and of course another spectacular performance from Johnny Depp ! I love this film and it made me laugh alot (and made me dance to the songs too!).
xxx Tracey xxx
Reply