New Orleans floods ... in Die Hard 4?!?
Filed under: Action, RumorMonger, Scripts, Politics
In a somewhat unsettling coincidence, an early script for Die Hard 4 – a project which Bruce Willis has apparently committed to shooting this fall – hit the net this week, and many who have seen it are cringing over a scene that takes place in a flooded New Orleans. The draft reviewed by Latino Review was written by Mark Bomback, and is actually an adaptation of an existing script called – wait for it – World War 3.com. This draft is currently undergoing a rewrite by frequent Willis clean-up man Doug Richardson, so it would seem highly likely that all references to New Orleans would be wiped from any draft used for shooting. Still, it's not a little eerie to read about what was to have been.
John McClane, the rebel policeman played by Willis in the three previous incarnations, has moved on from the NYPD; he's now "divorced, he's much older, in and out of Alcoholic's Anonymous" – and, natch, he's working for the Department of Homeland Security. It's McClane's job to go after hackers, and we just happen to drop in on him as a team of vaguely Eurocentric cyber pranksters are plotting a massive operation.
As McClane is transporting an (unrelated) hacker from New York to Washington D.C., the cyber terrorists strike, and within hours, the NYC transit system, the NYSE, and the systems controlling the nation's ATMs have all crashed. The hacker in McClane's custody figures out that the other hackers are following the instructions in a book (written by yet another hacker) called, How to Crash an Empire in Three Days. The film then turns into a buddy movie of sorts, as McClane and his criminal charge traipse about the country looking for the real e-evildoers.
This is where the whole enterprise gets prophetic. The good hacker predicts that something bad is going to go down in New Orleans: the empire-crashing how-to said something about splitting the country in two, and if one was to bomb the Port of New Orleans, it would shut down the Mississippi River and essentially do just that. So McClane and his new friend head down there – only to watch an explosion on the Huey P. Long Bridge, one that Latino Review describes as "beyond massive, flipping nearby vessels and sending 70 ft waves in both directions", and presumably wrecking havoc similar to what I've been seeing on CNN all week.
It goes without saying that this scene would be impossible to film at this point – but it's still fascinating to read about, if for no other reason than that it strikes one more blow to various officials' "who woulda thunk it?" defense.
[via Libertas]









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-04-2005 @ 1:44AM
Erik Davis said...
What happened to the rumors the film would be set in a jungle? Though I'm not excited they're making another Die Hard, I'm happy to hear Willis is no longer swinging from trees.
Reply
9-04-2005 @ 2:17AM
lee said...
The jungle thing became Tears of the Sun instead of DH4.
Reply
9-04-2005 @ 3:29AM
Man said...
So what your basically saying is lookout for the next big budget movie script because it is what will happen to us next.
Anyone read T4 yet?
Reply
9-04-2005 @ 12:05PM
John said...
Seems like right after 9-11, there was a script floating around that had the towers being destroyed, in a movie, that had been written long before 9-11 actually happened, it got cancelled for obvious reasons. Die hard was a great series because in all of them John McClain was in the wrong place at the wrong time, and became a hero by default. A fourth isn't needed.
Reply
9-04-2005 @ 1:34PM
Sam said...
The scenario of New Orleans flooding was one of the top three major disasters that FEMA anticipated, along with a San Francisco earthquake and another terrorist attack in New York. The writers aren't prophetic. They just did some research.
As for why the gov't was slow to respond, I don't know...
Reply
9-04-2005 @ 3:32PM
Michael Pate said...
Floods have happened in New Orleans for years; the only thing unusual about this one is the size. That is one of the reasons so many people were determined to stay even after the first few days, as without communications, they didn't grasp the magnitude of what was happening. As to why state and local governents were totally unprepared and actually hampered federal efforts at intervention, I hope we learn more someday.
Reply
9-04-2005 @ 6:03PM
Homework Help said...
Yeah, i think the gov was reasonable in responding to the disaster given the magnitude of the storm
Reply
9-05-2005 @ 3:41AM
M Thatcher said...
If you want prophecy this is the most chilling and would seem to put every last nail in the "who woulda thunk it?" defense. http://www.pretentia.com/thatchspace/wordpress/?p=55
Reply
11-04-2005 @ 2:54AM
Marie Soloman said...
New Orleans would be a great city to film this movie!!!
Reply