Angelina a Bond Girl? Be Still My Heart.
Filed under: Action, Casting, RumorMonger, Newsstand, Angelina Jolie
According to England's The Sun (which as a news source is pretty much
as reliable as my dog Abbey), Angelina Jolie has signed to co-star
in Casino Royale. Holy crap. If this is true, how many of the Daniel Craig
haters do you think will suddenly be more than fine with every little
Bond thing? Seriously. She's the hottest thing on two legs - and since the
chicks in Bond movies are pretty much all about over-the-top sexuality (which
is always, in the end, sort of disappointing in PG-13 movies), I can
see this working out pretty well for ticket sales. The only problem is
that her character's name (again, says [Oh, and while I'm sneaking a Bond post, the whole Craig announcement press conference can be seen here, if you're into that sort of thing.]
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-17-2005 @ 12:39PM
The Jeremy said...
I'd rent it if there was an unrated edition (Hard R). Well, if you count NetFlix as "renting". But still, I'm boycotting. Bring back Brosnan or I'll spend my drachmas elsewhere.
Reply
10-17-2005 @ 1:01PM
mick du russel said...
Hey, you got my attention! I agree, Vesper Lynd is definitely not an appropriate name for the new bond chick. How bout something like Stixty Nine?
Reply
10-17-2005 @ 1:31PM
M*A*S*H*E*D said...
Well, I didn't read the book, but Ursula Andress' character in Casino Royale is named Vesper Lynd (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0061452/).
Reply
10-17-2005 @ 1:48PM
Scott Weinberg said...
I'm still mad at Abbey for promising a Goonies sequel.
Reply
10-17-2005 @ 3:00PM
Tony said...
Angelina Jolie = not hot.
Sorry.
Reply
10-18-2005 @ 7:07PM
Finished.Law.School said...
Are they real in that image? And where are the rest of her eye brows?
Reply