Cinematical Seven: Remakes that are better than the original
Filed under: Cinematical Seven
Yeah, we hate it when Hollywood remakes films that were perfectly good the first time around. Horror films like The Fog and House on Haunted Hill, TV series like The Fugitive, The Beverly Hillbillies and I Spy, comedies like Guess Who's Coming To Dinner, and sci-fi movies like Planet of the Apes. But, you know what? Some remakes are actually better than the original. Below is my list. What's yours?
- Ocean's 11: Sure, the original has Sinatra and Martin and Sammy and has a certain 60s Rat Pack cool about it (love the furniture!), but the remake with George Clooney and Brad Pitt is approximately 19,000 times better. It handles the plot much more effectively (the original is pretty damn boring in many parts), it's perfectly cast, and Soderbergh's direction is inventive and fun. A crowd-pleasing popcorn flick that also happens to be smart and artistic.
- The Bourne Identity: Yeah, there was an earlier version, a TV mini-series with Richard Chamberlain and Jaclyn Smith. I have it on tape and it's actually a good version of the story, but the Doug Liman-directed version with Matt Damon is better, more propulsive, more exciting, more believable.
- Titanic: There have been several versions of the Titanic story, most notably the 1953 version with Clifton Webb and the British A Night To Remember. Both films are good (especially A Night..."), but for pure historical accuracy and epic grandeur and emotional pull, you have to give it to James Cameron's blockbuster. And if that makes me "uncool," well, then I'm very uncool.
- The Thomas Crown Affair: Steve McQueen was a great American actor, and the original version of this movie, with Faye Dunaway, has a pace and style all it's own, but they really did something special with the Pierce Brosnan/Rene Russo remake. It's a lot like the Ocean's Eleven remake: a clever, crowd pleasing popcorn flick, but it's also witty and stylish, with lots of fun twists. I consider it Brosnan's fifth Bond flick. His best one.
- Alien: As many have reported, this is a remake of a 50s sci-fi flick called It! The Terror From Beyond Space. And that film is fun in a campy 50s sort of way, but Alien was completely terrifying when it came out. I actually think the sequel, Aliens, is an even better flick, but Alien really freaked people out and had lots of tension, especially that scene at the dinner table...eeek.
- Evil Dead II: I know, I know, you're saying this is a sequel, not a remake, but watch both movies again. This has basically the same exact plot as the original, and the same leading man (Bruce Campbell) and is much more a remake than a sequel, even if it does have "II" in it. This one is so incredibly energetic and gross and funny, right from the start. The first one was a little bit more low budget in it's look and execution. Evil Dead II isn't exactly a big budget flick, of course, but it's much better than the original in every way, a movie that succeeds in being really funny but also scary in some spots.
- The Maltese Falcon: Yup, this movie was a remake too, of a couple of minor flicks in the 30s, and I don't even have to explain why this isn't just a better film but also one of the great mystery movies of all-time, do I? Of course I don't.
(Oh, and if I can predict another one? Casino Royale will be a much better film than the 1967 comedy version. I don't care who they have as James Bond...Daniel Craig, Andy Dick, Paris Hilton, it doesn't matter. This movie will be better than the original. You heard it here first.)
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-05-2005 @ 2:43PM
Tan The Man said...
A NIght To Remember is way better than the overrated Titanic (although I will say Titanic is very well made). Donald Sutherland's remake of Invasion Of The Body Snatchers was better than the original, although the original was pretty good too.
Reply
11-05-2005 @ 9:40PM
Tenken said...
I'll probably be flogged for this, but I really think that Verbinski's Ring was much better than the Japanese version. The Japanese version relied too much on supernatural plot devices and simply wasn't all that scary. Just compare the "videos" from both films and you'll see that the U.S. version is more than just shock value.
Reply
11-05-2005 @ 3:57PM
AshRules said...
I dunno about the Evil Dead II... the first one was a bit better IMHO.
Army of Darkness... now THAT... that... was a BOOMSTICK of a film! :D
Reply
11-05-2005 @ 4:47PM
Scott Weinberg said...
I don't consider Titanic & Alien remakes at all, although I can see why you'd include them.
For me, the two best remakes are horror titles:
John Carpenter's The Thing & David Cronenberg's The Fly.
I'm also a big fan of the new-fangled Dawn of the Dead and Texas Chainsaw Massacre, but no WAY are they BETTER than their predecessors.
Reply
11-05-2005 @ 4:55PM
Scott Weinberg said...
Oooh, also: The '78 version of Invasion of the Body Snatchers is, IMO, an improvement over Siegel's version -- but not by a whole lot. The '93 version (Ferrara's Body Snatchers) is pretty solid as well.
Oh! Chuck Russell's remake of The Blob! Lotsa fun there.
Reply
11-05-2005 @ 6:43PM
drew said...
Call it heresy, but I'm of the opinion that Scorsese's Cape Fear is better than the original. Direction, acting, script, it's all superior. Sure, Mitchum's Max Cady is fine and dandy, but De Niro's is an icon.
And hey, Gus Van Sant's underrated Psycho is...just kidding.
Reply
11-05-2005 @ 7:24PM
S.T. VanAirsdale said...
The Thing
The Man Who Knew Too Much
His Girl Friday
Reply
11-05-2005 @ 8:14PM
Patrick said...
Definitely Cronenberg's The Fly and Carpenter's The Thing, as others already mentioned. Does Desperado count as a remake of El Mariachi? It's kind of like Evil Dead 1 and 2 that way. I also quite liked the US remake of The Ring, although I'm not sure it was better.
Reply
11-15-2005 @ 11:49AM
Martha Fischer said...
Oh Bob. The real Ocean's Eleven is so much better than Clooney's version - and I don't even like the Rat Pack one that much. Clooney's was just so, so disappointing that I'm not sure I've recovered even now.
Reply
11-05-2005 @ 10:29PM
lauren said...
An Affair to Remember was much better than the 1933 version, and the 1993 version, which makes the remakes both better AND worse.
The Italian Job was much better the second time around.
Reply
11-06-2005 @ 8:52AM
Peter Nellhaus said...
Martin Scorcese's version of Age of Innocence was the actually the third film adaptation from Edith Wharton's novel.
Reply
11-07-2005 @ 11:44AM
evan said...
okay okay, Evil Dead 2. Sounds like a sequal, at first glance looks more like a remake. But it's not. Sam and Bruce and friends couldn't get the rights, for some reason, to footage from the first movie, so they couldn't do a quick summary of what has happened for the intro, like they kind of do for Army of Darkness. What what did they do? They remade the first 15 minutes or so. If you watch the Evil Dead, then start watching Evil Dead 2 from the moment that Ash first gets possessed, you'll see that it's a sequal.
Reply
11-07-2005 @ 11:59PM
jer said...
I have to second the Gore Verbinski Ring. Considerably better.
Reply