Review: Zathura
Filed under: Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Theatrical Reviews, Family Films

Zathura was a lot of fun at times but overall not very memorable. I know I wasn't the target audience, and I realized early in the film that I was probably too old to enjoy everything properly. I saw the movie at the opening night of Fantastic Fest, and it received plenty of laughs and applause.
I'm sure kids would like Zathura. In particular, little boys would like it. The movie makes no attempt at all to appeal to women—the one female in the film spends half the movie as a frozen statue. Zathura is all about the boys and what they do when they're on their own, with no parents or females in their way.
The movie has been adapted from a picture book by Chris Van Allsburg, along the same general lines as his previous book Jumanji. Because we've been inundated with trailers for this movie, and because most of us have heard of Jumanji, we know the basic plotline of Zathura. Two bickering brothers start playing a mysterious old board game that they find in the cellar, and realize that the actions represented in the game are actually occurring in their lives. This time, it's an outer-space game. A game card representing a meteor shower means that meteors start falling on the house, which has been uprooted and transported to the depths of space. When can they go home? When they finish the game.
Zathura is a standard family movie, which means that the boys are obviously going to have to learn to work together in order to finish the game and return home. They get some assistance from a passing astronaut. They accidentally petrify their older sister, and even when she returns to normal she's of little use except for the usual female screaming and swooning. The lesson does seem to be hammered home without a whole lot of subtlety. At times it seemed like events were occurring just so the kids, or the kids in the audience, could learn their lesson a little bit more.
However, the moral of Learn to Play Nice is sugar-coated with some wonderful special effects. Director Jon Favreau has said that he tried to use non-CGI effects when possible so the actors would react more realistically. The spaceship, robot, and general space effects all have a wonderful retro look to them. Personally, I winced every time something happened to the lovely house and its gorgeous wood interiors, which probably puts me firmly in the grownup category.
The one flaw in the special effects was with the aliens. I actually think it would have been preferable if we never saw the aliens close up; maybe just in silhouette. Aliens in film all seem to have the same look, and they're not particularly scary, and I almost always feel like I'm looking at a rubber mask. Stan Winston Studios did the effects, and perhaps I'm jaded by the general look of their creatures? I don't know.
I am a fan of tiny, marvelous effects: the moment in which the little chip of flying meteor burns a hole in the game card that one of the kids is holding is probably my favorite moment in the film. (I'm sorry it showed up in the trailer and hope that doesn't diminish the effect in the movie itself.)
The movie is at its best for children and grownups when the astronaut, played by Dax Shepard, shows up on screen. Shepard is an ideal casting choice; not too well-known on sight to make his appearance ridiculous (unlike Robin Williams in Jumanji), and continually entertaining without having to mug for the camera. The kids are also well-cast, but I have to wonder what in the world Tim Robbins was doing in the film. He was fine, but it was a small role that any actor could have played. IMDb says that Frank Oz voiced the robot, which I didn't catch when I saw the movie; is my Muppet radar flagging?
And the product placement seemed a little obvious at times. One of the kids wears a shirt with an trendy Ugli doll on it, which is shown repeatedly and to great effect. The astronaut eats a lot of deli stuff with blatant Whole Foods wrapping. Also, I kept wondering who the big Bullitt fan was who was involved with the film, because a large poster for that film was prominent in a number of scenes. I love any opportunity to see Steve McQueen, but it seemed unnecessary and not in character with the film.
Jon Favreau's last directorial effort was Elf, which was popular with a wide range of people. Friends kept saying "I know, it looks silly, but give it a chance," and it turned out to be a quite nice family Christmas movie (with a great soundtrack), the kind of movie you can watch with practically anyone.
Zathura is a good solid family film: geared more towards kids, but offering some enjoyment and little irritation for adults. That's such a rare thing these days—so many "family films" are grating and intolerable for anyone over the age of ten—that I feel like I ought not to complain too much about Zathura's few shortcomings. I don't especially want to see the movie again, but if circumstances warranted it, I wouldn't mind a bit.









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-10-2005 @ 6:03PM
Christina said...
Just because a film doesn't have any particularly good female roles, doesn't mean it isn't going to appeal to females. To assume so is condescending.
I've seen plenty of good and great films without solid female characters or female leads. What matters is quality of overall content. I'm a movie buff and a geek who likes good sci-fi and fantasy.
Zathura doesn't appeal to me much because of its story, not my gender.
Reply
11-10-2005 @ 7:13PM
Targ8ter said...
I'd argue that your interest in the story is directly tied to gender, regardless of who is in the film. This isn't really a "girl movie," and I doubt it would be even if the sister were the star.
Reply
11-10-2005 @ 10:00PM
Bruce Wayne-Johnson said...
OK one thing to set clear here - its doesnt matter how old you are - a movie is good no matter what "age" group you are appealing to and I think that using age is never a conceit to a movie review - it sucks or doesn't based on anybody reviewing it.
Do you think your age had anything to do with you liking or disliking THE INCREDIBLES, FINDING NEMO or any of the Pixar films, INDIANA JONES, HARRY POTTER etc. al.
Put a 4 year old in front of anything that moves and he/she will come out enjoying it...the only thing age brings is cyninism. FANTASTIC FOUR and CHICKEN LITTLE weren't awesome by any comparison but they did well at the box-office so if you are comparing money to critqiue then that is a different story altogether.
IS ZATHURA going to make it big at the BO - you dont know because the movie isnt targeted at you. But you can tell its not a good movie because no matter the talent or the subject matter it should reach on all levels and Jon Favearau should know that (And Sony who struck it on all levels with Spider-Man) if he wants to continue having a directing career (Warlord of Mars better be good!)
Reply
11-11-2005 @ 12:05AM
Christina said...
In response to the above (another condescending comment, by the way), what constitutes a "girl movie" to you? Because overgeneralization is exactly the critique I was making about this review, and you've simply seemed to continue that trend.
I even took pains to mention that I'm a geek and I'm into my sci-fi and fantasy. My lack of interest in the story isn't due to my gender. I've seen plenty of excellent films about males. It simply didn't spark my interest much. It looks silly, plain and simple.
Reply
11-11-2005 @ 3:46AM
Finished.Law.School said...
I had a ticket for this tonight but I couldn't make it. I really want to see this...
Reply
11-13-2005 @ 1:09AM
Targ8ter said...
I'm totally aware that to label a film as a guy movie or a girl movie is a pretty wide generalization, Christiana. That's why I put it in quotation marks. I was just referring to the fact that movies are made with a conscious effort to appeal to certain demographics, and Zathura is pretty obviously a guy-targeted film (I submit its ad campaign as exhibit A). It's not because it's sci-fi, and it's not because it's mostly guys in it, it's because the structure is action-action-danger-huge explosion-action-danger-danger-fighting-action-action.
In general, and I mean that very generally, films that are character-heavy tend to attract female audiences, and films that are plot-heavy tend to attract male audiences. I'd argue that it has a lot less to do with the setting, genre, or even the gender of the main characters. And also, guys tend to not mind silly as much, and we usually even like plain and simple.
I must confess, one of my favorite "guy films" is 90% just "Bruce Willis must kill X number of terrorists to win the movie." Plain, simple, and sometimes silly. If it had been Sigourney Weaver liberating a department store with a machine gun, I doubt it would have been any more successful with female audiences.
Reply
11-18-2005 @ 8:40PM
Ed Long said...
I was greatly disappointed by Zathura. They had that 4th grader saying some pretty raunchy words. The brothers were mean to each other excessively, and there were too many instances in which the children were shown in dangerous situations. My six-year-old who never flinches at anything had to leave the theater because he was scared. I was glad, because I wanted to leave too. NOT a family movie, in my opinion.
Reply
11-19-2005 @ 12:26AM
Jette said...
Ed, I wish I'd been more specific about age appropriateness instead of generically calling it a family film. I told my sister that the movie was too scary for her five-year-old daughter ... the aliens, however fake I might think they look, are not for younger, easily frightened kids. I don't have children, but my guess is that 8-10 year olds would be the minimum age to appreciate the film.
Reply