Cinematical Seven: Great movie critics
Filed under: Theatrical Reviews, MetaMetaCritic, Newsstand, Cinematical Seven
There are so many film critics. Some never seem to like anything, and some seem to like everything (*cough* Dittman *cough*). What you have to do when choosing a film critic is pick someone who you are comfortable with, someone who you find yourself reading over and over. Someone who seems to "get it," even if you don't agree with them all of the time. Here's are seven great film critics working today.
1. Roger Ebert: I'm not sure if everyone will agree with me on this, because some people see him as just "that thumbs guy" (as a local news show host here in Boston once said). But can you name another film critic who manages to not only be popular, but also has the film knowledge and the writing chops to back up that popularity? I don't always agree with him (three and a half stars for Anaconda?!), but I agree with him a lot. And I can't think of another film critic working today who loves film more than Roger Ebert. Even when I don't agree with him I can see where he's coming from. You don't get that with many critics. And that's why he's at #1.
2. Anthony Lane: Plain and simple, this guy can write. There's a beautiful voice and rhythm in his writing, and he's as much at home talking about Luis Bunuel as he is about Julia Roberts. Have you read his book Nobody's Perfect: Writings From The New Yorker? It's a terrific collection of film and book reviews, along with profiles of celebrities and other pop culture figures, most of them from The New Yorker. After you buy Ebert's annual book for the film fan in your family, you should pick up Lane's.
3. Stephen Hunter: Another guy with a book out, Hunter is like Ebert, a strong intellectual prowess but plugged into the zeitgeist. Read him if you want to learn how to write a movie review.
4. Rob Blackwelder: One of the best reviewers on the Net. Thoughtful, mean when he has to be (but hardly ever mean-spirited), and with a ton of interviews and other features at his site to boot. Great stuff. (He's on hiatus right now; hope he returns.)
5. Stephanie Zacharek: Charles Taylor writes for Salon.com too, but Zacharek is the one I listen to. I find myself agreeing with her more and more.
6. James Berardinelli: One of the more prolific and well-known web reviewers (he also has two books out), Berardinelli's reviews are very accessible, and he uses a star system that cuts to the heart of the matter. He's also no pushover. Sometimes you sense that web-based film critics can either be overly snarky (because it's the web and they can get away with anything) or they just go ahead and give every movie a couple of stars right off the bat because of an "every film deserves it" mentality. Berardinelli is honest and won't give a filmmaker or actor a pass. If he gives something three and a half or four stars, you know they definitely earned it. That's refreshing.
7. David Edelstein: I often disagree with Edelstein, but the Slate (and soon to be New York magazine) film critic is a clever guy and writes enjoyable reviews that get the people on the forums talking. His reviews are often long and engrossing, with several detours to talk about not only the who and the what but also the why.









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-28-2005 @ 10:10PM
Ryan Sanders said...
You missed Jonathon Ross from the BBC.
However this looks like a US only line-up.
Reply
11-28-2005 @ 11:24PM
Peter Nellhaus said...
I would vote for J. Hoberman of the Village Voice, and Jonathan Rosenbaum of the Chicago Reader as two critics I keep learning from, who keep there eyes open for the film treasures from around the world, as well as digging new treasures from the past.
Reply
11-28-2005 @ 11:35PM
karina said...
I like this list a lot, but I would have made room for Hoberman and the Wall Street Journal's Joe Morgenstern, whose weekly reviews for KCRW have the distinction of being the first podcast I ever subscribed to.
Next up: Dead and/or Non Practicing Critics, starring Farber and Kael...
Reply
11-29-2005 @ 1:11AM
Jason Scott said...
STEPHANIE "TRASH AND WRECK" from Salon? She never met a movie, film process or completely obscure aspect of a production she couldn't cleat into the ground with her inane writing. Pass!
Reply
11-29-2005 @ 2:03AM
Adnan Khan said...
What about Harry Knowles at AICN?
Just kidding!!!! :o)
Reply
11-29-2005 @ 7:12AM
Christopher Campbell said...
I'm currently reading Hunter's book. He's extremely blurb-friendly, but he knows how to write for the masses. For those who don't care about the masses, I prefer Armond White and Matt Zoller-Seitz at the NY Press. This week features another great essay from White doing his infamous trashtalking of other critics and the movies that they overpraise.
Reply
11-29-2005 @ 8:13AM
Elliott said...
Travers from 'Rolling Stone' magazine, honest and funny.
Reply
11-29-2005 @ 11:30AM
cel said...
I have to third the nomination of Hoberman -- simply has to be in the top seven list.
cel
Reply
11-30-2005 @ 11:38AM
Vidiot said...
No Richard Corliss? I'd put him at #3 on your list.
Reply
12-02-2005 @ 6:50PM
Stuart Ian Burns said...
You forgot Mark Kermode.
Also: Jonathan Ross has an annoying habit of not reviewing films made by his friends or people he'd like to be his friends.
Reply
12-04-2005 @ 8:06PM
Dan Geiser said...
Bob is it...
"Here are seven great film critics working today."
or
"Here's our seven great film critics working today."
?
Reply