SAG, WGA protest product placement
Filed under: Celebrities and Controversy, Newsstand, Movie Marketing, Politics
Like pretty much everyone else on earth,
the members of the Screen Actors and Writers Guilds are crazy sick of product placement. Amen, brothers and sisters -
amen. They even staged a protest yesterday, outside of a hotel where agents and producers were huddling with
advertisers, though no one bothered to invite us regular joes. According to union heads, their complaints hinge on
studio-advertiser deals that force writers to create scripts containing pitches for products, and force the poor actors
to read said scripts. Oh, and they're also (of course), worried about the public, who might be stupid enough to think
that Lorelai
Gilmore is not only a real person, but also really loves Starbuck's. Some of which, you know, sounds pretty
reasonable on the face of it, right? I mean, reading crappy scripts is bad enough, but when you have to shill for
MasterCard, it just gets humiliating.The only problem with SAG's and WGA's righteous indignation, however, is that not much of what they're whining about has anything to do with them. In fact, the two groups reportedly complain most about the out of control product placement on reality TV, a medium with which they have no involvement whatsoever (assuming, that is, that they don't show up on The Surreal Life). Hmm. So what's the problem again?
[image from 8bit Joystick]
_thumbnail.jpg)
Fan Made: Steampunk 'Return of the Jedi' Figures_thumbnail.jpg)
Exclusive: 'A Christmas Tale' Poster Premiere_thumbnail.jpg)
Cinematical's Fourth Annual Halloween Costume Contest is Coming!
Netflix Unleashes Another Batch of "Forgotten" Flicks
Geek Daily: Wolverine, 'Batman 3', 'Punisher' and 'Kick-Ass'
_thumbnail.jpg)
_thumbnail.jpg){kind=spacer}
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-09-2006 @ 9:56PM
Chris said...
While I agree, I also feel inclined to point out that if the screenwriters want you to believe that what is happening is as close to the real world as possible, then product placement is just another addition to that reality.
Face it, people like Starbucks. I like Starbucks. Thus, you will see me in a Starbucks from time to time when I feel obliged to pay for overpriced coffee.
I hated seeing people black out any type of "advertisement" or create fake logos to put on fictional cans of soda that you'd never see in a store.
But, perhaps, the most prolific example of product placement is anything Apple has. You see Apple computers on just about *every* television show and in the movies. It's as if Apple was really the most popular computer and company on the planet when the computer usage statistics prove otherwise.
Perhaps what we really need is a reality check. Pepsi isn't the most popular soda out there, Apple isn't the most popular computer out there by far, and not everyone loves to spend an exuberant amount of money on coffee.
Reply
2-10-2006 @ 7:42AM
Bryan said...
This is why I hated IRobot. The product placement for converse, Dr pepper, Audi, and FedEx were distracting. In other movies, it works well, if the product is relevant to the times. Austin Powers made this work because it was funny. The Woolworth's in Oh Brother Where art Thou, and King Kong were period ads, and they added realism. If I paid for the ticket, and sat through the ads before the previews, then why am I forced to watch more ads (disguised as a movie). Theatre owners wonder why viewership is down??? This is a contributing factor.
Reply
2-10-2006 @ 7:29PM
Jake of 8bitjoystick.com said...
That is from my post
8Bit Joystick.com: What If Hollywood Made The Lord of the Rings
Reply