Beware, the new generation of filmmakers!
Filed under: Critical Thought, DIY/Filmmaking
WNYC's Brian Lehrer
did a segment this morning with Joshua Horowitz, author of the new book, The Mind
of the Modern Moviemaker: Twenty Conversations with the New Generation of Filmmakers, and Kerry Conran, creator of
that strange hybrid of painterly geekery and celebrity charity, Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow. It's a
good piece of radio, but Horowitz' book is an odd bag, comprised as it is with interviews with both card-carrying
hipster aesthetes like Michel Gondry, and dude-movie heroes like Todd "Old School" Phillips. To many
of us, a lot of the guys that Horowitz singles out for investigation are unremarkable hacks; to Horowitz, they're a new
crop of auteurs, stamping a generation-specific brand of irony and self-referentiality and digital savvy on classical
filmmaking. I'm sure he's probably right, but I'm not sure this is cause for celebration. The segment reminded me of a coversation I had last week about the state of the jump cut, and other technical tactics that filmmakers employ to remind you that you're watching a film. The person I was speaking with praised a certain filmmaker's use of such tactics as "Godardian". In response, I said something along the lines of, "I think if Godard was dead, one would hope that the post-digital flurry of self-referentiality would have him rolling in his grave." (As it is, the old New Wave master seems to be too far afield of relevancy to cause much of a fuss about anything).
The running theme of Horowitz's argument seems to be that it's easier now, for people who want to badly enough, to make films: Conran spends years developing virtual sets on his home computer and eventually finds himself directing Gwyneth Paltrow in front of a blue screen; Kevin Smith maxes out his credit card, feeds his friends lines about blow jobs and Yoda, and we get Clerks. Which all reminds me of a line from a little dino-film by Steven Speilberg, who probably deserves as much credit for the filmmaking foibles of this new generation as anyone: "You spent so much time worrying about whether you could do it, you didn't stop to think if you should."
Later today, you'll be able to listen to the interview here.












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-21-2006 @ 4:28PM
Christopher Campbell said...
Karina, that last paragraph is a brilliant statement. Just think of the difference between Spielberg who paid his dues working in television, honing his craft as a director, and the new generation who just pay the fees for software.
Reply
2-21-2006 @ 6:52PM
jmv said...
“I'm not sure this is cause for celebration… “
Yeah...
Film Making should remain an elitist crap-factory where no one ever tries anything new or decides to buck the system.
How can you decry the failings of Hollywood and the studio system and then basically say that people shouldn't put in the effort to experiment and try to do anything differently.
Reply
2-22-2006 @ 1:08AM
Mikel Swanberg said...
Virtual sets are great. I have no idea why they aren't used for everything. One simple place that they are only occasionally used is one of the biggest no-brainers... That's the segments of films that have mock newscasts. Take a look at the news set designs Virtualsets.com Awesome stuff! Why doesn't everyone doing a mock news broadcast in their film use these guys (or at least someone like them)??? At least use this technology at its most basic level. Afterall, news sets are the front line for real-time virtual sets.
Reply