That other Capote flick
Filed under: Drama, Independent, Awards, Warner Independent Pictures, RumorMonger, Movie Marketing, Oscar Watch, Cinematical Indie
According to a post at The Hollywood Reporter's Risky
Biz Blog, everyone associated with Douglas McGrath's Infamous is hoping that Philip Seymour Hoffman is a loser at Sunday's Oscar ceremony. Why? Well,
Infamous is also about Truman
Capote's relationship with killers Dick Hickock and Perry Smith, albeit from a slightly different angle (it's based
on George
Plimpton's book about said relationship, whereas Capote's source is a book by Gerald Clarke). McGrath's film, which will be hit theaters in New York and LA in October, stars Toby Jones as Capote, Sandra Bullock as Harper Lee, and Daniel Craig, that bit of Bond-y goodness, as Smith. Also appearing in the film (and supposedly hating on Hoffman) are an array of stars, including Gwyneth Paltrow, Sigourney Weaver and Isabella Rossellini. But here's what I don't get: why would a Hoffman loss be better for Infamous than a win? It's not as if the movie won't get distribution if he wins, or something - Warner Independent Pictures already has the rights. And Capote's profile couldn't possibly get any higher, so the competition won't be anything new. I'm not sure I buy this whole "they want Hoffman to looooooose!" angle.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-28-2006 @ 6:06PM
Jay Allen said...
I've seen dozens of ads for CAPOTE since Hoffman got his nod. Before that? Nothing. The studio left the movie to gain its own legs, sans advertising barrage. If Hoffman wins, you can bet the studio will do a second round of advertising, this time touting Hoffman as an Oscar winner. That's going to leave people wondering why the hell they should see a SECOND movie about the writing of IN COLD BLOOD, and watch Capote played by not-Hoffman, the non-Oscar Winner.
Reply