A Feature Shot on Camera Phones
Filed under: Foreign Language, Independent, Thrillers, Tech Stuff, DIY/Filmmaking, Newsstand, Cinematical Indie
SMS Sugar Man claims to be the first full-length
feature ever made on camera phones. While my initial reaction to the concept was that it's a crappy, gimmicky idea that
would result in something unwatchable, I'm now not so sure. A look around the movie's website makes it immediately clear that the
camera phone thing is NOT a gimmick - in fact, you have to dig around to even find that fact. Instead, it seems like it
was just a cheap (the movie cost $165,000, and was shot in less than two weeks with eight phones), creative way to make
a movie. Instead of keeping the film in a digital format, South African director Aryan
Kaganof transfered his footage to 35mm film, and the resulting product will be projected in theaters later this
year. This approach is a far cry from the camera phone movies that have been made to this point, and appears to be the
first true attempt to fully integrate the camera phone technology with traditional cinema.Whether the movie is any good, however, is something else entirely. A trailer will be show for the first time next week at the African and Latin American Cinema Festival in Milan; it will also go up on the website at that point. Oddly, I can't find any information about the film's actual release date, but the plan is to make it available to watch on cell phones (in 30 minutes chunks), as well as in theaters, on TV, and on DVD.












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-14-2006 @ 1:36PM
Alex said...
So the budget was $165,000 and they couldn't afford a $300 DV camera? Or 8, for that matter? And they were able to light the scenes adequately? And the director put it on 35mm?!!! Something doesn't add up here. Unless this guy is a major glutton for punishment, I don't understand why anyone would opt to make a film with phones if they have the means to transfer it to film.
Let's hope that it was an aesthetic choice and not a gimmick.
Reply
3-14-2006 @ 1:55PM
Elrond Hobbert said...
total gimmick. Cheap DV cameras cost less than most usable camera phones. But hey it worked cuz we're talking about it!
Reply