Goldman and Arnie, Crusading Again?
Filed under: Action, Drama, RumorMonger, Scripts
Many moons ago, genius screenwriter William
Goldman (The Princess Bride, Heat, All the
President's Men, Butch Cassidy and the Sundance
Kid) wrote a movie called Crusade about well, the Crusades. Arnold
Schwarzenegger was set to star, Paul Verhoeven was going to
direct, and the project advanced far enough to have both a release date and an early promotional campaign. And then,
for reasons I can't figure out (if you know anything, please educate us in the comments), the whole thing just
vanished.Now, according to Moviehole, the project is back, possibly still with the participation of governator-but-not-for-long Schwarzenegger, who actually owns the rights. Details are sketchy at this point, but it's unlikely that Verhoeven will be involved, given his concerns about finding funding - especially these days - for a movie about "...the murderous attack of the Christians on the Arabs and the Jews. The Pope instigate[ed] this complete slaughterhouse, which ultimately had only one goal: to destroy as many Arabs as possible." Yeah, you can sorta see how big studios might be just a wee bit leery of that.
More details if we get them.












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-24-2006 @ 4:02PM
The Jeremy said...
Please stop with the "not for long" comments about Arnold's governorship. His competition is weak, especially considering the guy the Dems are going to nominate to run against him. Needless to say, he'll be re-elected this November no matter how much naysaying is typed on the blog-of-the-moment. Friggin know-it-all East Coasters. :)
Reply
3-24-2006 @ 4:10PM
guano said...
How will this movie differ from Kingdom of Heaven?
Reply
3-24-2006 @ 7:33PM
sean said...
"2. How will this movie differ from Kingdom of Heaven?"
Arnie will have a sawed-off shotgun :D
Reply
3-25-2006 @ 1:14PM
EJE said...
I recall the rumor mill on this and I'll dig through old premiere mags to see what i can find in print, but the reason it wasn't made wasn't political but humdrum: budget. Arnie wanted his $20 mil plus gross points, Verhoeven was in a position to argue that he needed $150 mil to tell the story (then but not now), and the whole thing fell to bits. Luckily for us.
Reply
3-27-2006 @ 9:02AM
Juan Arschloch said...
If you can't get your 'Present' correct, at the very least read a book and get your history right. idiota.
It was in 635 AD, that is three years after Mohammed's death, that the armies of the Crescent Moon invaded Christian Syria and Christian Palestine. It was in 638 that they took Jerusalem and the Holy Sepulchure. It was in 640 that after conquering Persia and Armenia and Mesopotamia, present-day Iraq, they invaded Christian Egypt and overran Christian Maghreb. That is, the present Tunisia and Algeria and Morocco. It was in 668 that for the first time they attacked Constantinople and laid a siege that would last five years. It was in 711 that after crossing the Strait of Gibralter they landed in the most Catholic Iberian Peninsula, took possession of Portugal and Spain where despite the Pelayos and the Cid Campeadors and the other warriors engaged in the Reconquest they remained for no less than eight centuries. And whoever believes in the myth of *peaceful coexistence that marked the relationships between the conquered and the conquerors* should reread the stories of the burned convents and monestaries, of the profaned churches, of the raped nuns, of the Christian or Jewish women abducted to be locked away in their harems. He should ponder on the crucifixioins of Cordoba, the hangings of Grenada, the beheadings of Toledo and Barcelona, of Seville and Zamora. (The beheadings of Seville, ordered by Mutamid: the king who used those severed heads, heads of Jews and Christians, to adorn his palace. The beheadings of Zamora, ordered by Almanzor: the vizier who was called the-patron-of-the-philosophers, the greatest leader Islamic Spain has ever produced). Christ! Invoking the name of Jesus meant instant execution. Crucifixion, of course, or decapitation or hanging or impalement. Ringing a bell, the same. Wearing green, the colour exclusive to Islam, also. And when a Muslim passed by, every Jew and Christian was obliged to step aside. To bow. And mind to the Jew or the Christian who dared react to the insults of a Muslim. As for the much-flaunted detail that the infidel-dogs were not obliged to convert to Islam, not even encouraged to do so, do you know why they were not? Because those who converted to Islam did not pay taxes. Those who refused, on the contrary, did.
From Spain, in 721 AD, they passed into the no less Catholic France. Led by Abd al-Rahman, the Governor of Andalusia, they crossed the Pyrenees and took Narbonne. There they massacred the entire male population, enslaved all the women and children, then proceeded towards Carcassonne. From Carcassonne they were to Nimes where they slaughtered nuns and friars. From Nimes they went to Lyons and Dijon where they pillaged every single church... And do you know how long their advance in France lasted? Eleven years. In waves. In 731 a wave of three hundred and eighty thousand infantry and sixteen thousand cavalry reached Bordeaux which surrendered at once. Then from Bordeaux it moved to Poitiers, from Poitiers it moved to Tours and, if in 732 Charles Martel had not won the battle of Poitiers-Tours, today the French too would dance the flamenco. In 827 they landed in Sicily, another target of their voraciousness. Massacring, beheading, impaling, crucifying as usual, they conquered Syracuse and Taormina the Messina and Palermo, and in three-quarters of a century (which is what it took to break the proud resistance of the Sicilians) they Islamized the island. They stayed for over two centuries, in Sicily: until they werre cleared out by the Normans. But in 836 they landed at Brindisi. In 840, at Bari. And they Islamized Puglia too. In 841 they landed at Ancona. Then from the Adriatic they moved back to the Tyrrhenian Sea and in the summer of 846 landed at Ostia. They sacked it, they burned it, and moving upriver from the mouth of the Tiber they reached Rome. They laid siege to it and one night they burst in. They plundered the basilicas of St. Peter and St. Paul, sacked both, and to get rid of them Pope Sergius II had to stipulate an annual tribute of twenty-five thousand pieces of silver. To prevent further attacks, his successor Leon IV had to erect the Leonine Walls.
Having left Rome, though, they descended on Campania. They stayed there for seventy years destroying Montecassino and tormenting Salerno. A city where, at one time, they amused themselves by sacrificing a nun's virginity every night. Do you know where? On the cathedral's altar. In 898 they landed in Provence. To be precise, in present-day St. Tropez. They settled there, and in 911 crossed the Alps to enter Piedmont. They occupied Turin and Casale, set fire to all the churches and libraries, killed thousands of Christians, then went to Switzerland. Here they reached the Graubunden valley and the lake of Geneva. Then, put off by the snow, did an about-turn and returned to the warm climate of Provence. In 940 they occupied Toulon where they settled and... Today it's fashionable to beat our breast over the Crusades. To blame the West for the Crusades. To see the Crusades as an injustice committed to the detriment of the poor-innocent-Muslims. But before being a series of expeditions to regain possession of the Holy Sepulchure that is of Jerusalem (which had been taken by the Muslims, remember, not by my aunt), the Crusades were the response to four centuries of invasions and occupations. They were a counter-offensive to stem Islamic expansionism in Europe. To deflect it, mors tua vita mea, towards the Orient (meaning India and Indonesia and China) then towards the whole African continent and towards Russia and Siberia where the Tartars converted to Islam were already crushing the followers of Christ. At the conclusion of the Crusades, in fact, the sons of Allah resumed their persecutions as before and more than before.
Reply