No, Not THAT Ring of Fire
Filed under: Documentary, Drama, Gay & Lesbian, Sports, Deals, Paramount, Newsstand
First we have the Johnny Cash biopic, Walk
the Line. Then Ring of Fire, an apparently very bad Cash musical opens on
Broadway. Plus, there's a documentary called Ring of Fire,
but that's about a boxer named Emile Griffith, not Johnny Cash. And now Columbia and Paramount are making a fiction
film called Ring of Fire - also about Griffith. Man, I'm already confused.Emile Griffith's story is a tragic, fascinating one, about a man who moved from a career in fashion into the boxing ring, where he eventually killed a man. Griffith's alleged (please correct me in the comments if I'm wrong, but it's my understanding that he's never actually called himself gay) homosexuality was a factor in that deadly fight, as it has been in his life from that moment on - he was beaten almost to the death in the 1990s in what appeared to be an incident of gay bashing - and, given both the riveting nature of his story and the growing acceptance of films with gay themes, it's certainly understandable that a studio would see this as a good time to tell his story.
Ring of Fire was a hit last year's Sundance, and a solid team has been assembled for the big studio, fictional treatment. The screenplay is being penned by playwright Stephen Adly Guirgis, and multiple Tony-winner George C. Wolfe (who also helmed HBO's highly-praised Lackawanna Blues) has been tapped to direct.









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-29-2006 @ 4:58PM
m13b said...
From what I remember of the documentary, Benny Paret teased Griffith about his homosexuality at the weigh-in before their third (and final) fight.
A fight almost broke out right then, but in the actual bout, Griffith had already been knocked down earlier and was probably going to lose when he rallied in the 12th, and knocked Paret into a fatal coma.
I thought the documentary made the homosexuality angle more of a footnote, really. It put more of the blame on Paret's manager, who really overworked his fighter, and should have had him retire before Griffith III instead of going for the extra payday.
Griffith was married at the time, but I'm pretty sure he spoke about coming out in the documentary. Then again, he was quite punch-drunk.
Reply
3-30-2006 @ 9:51AM
SumGuy said...
the musical might not be that terrible, afterall: http://www.usatoday.com/life/theater/reviews/2006-03-16-ring-of-fire_x.htm
Reply