Tribeca Review: Encounter Point
Filed under: Documentary, Independent, Tribeca, Festival Reports, Politics, Cinematical Indie

Shot over 18 months in the Middle East, Encounter Point is another in the long line of sincere, low-budget (this one cost $300,000-400,000) films intended to shed light on the terrible conflict between Israel and Palestine. In Encounter Point’s case, the conflict is explored via a handful of subjects, all of whom have been directly affected by its violence. Robi Damelin, a South African woman whose uncle was one of Nelson Mandela’s lawyers, lost her Israeli reservist son to a sniper’s bullet. Ali Aboawwad lost a brother to the conflict, and himself spent years in an Israeli prison. Shlomo Zagman, meanwhile, grew up in a settlement and spent most of his adult life there, sharing the far-right views of his neighbors; gradually, however, his perspective broadened and he left the settlement, and founded a peace movement.
While there are powerful individual stories in Encounter Point, the film’s major weakness is that it fails to effectively tie those stories together. They are presented, end to end, without a specific setting, and it’s impossible for the viewer to know what pieces of information to hold on to. Are we to remember their names? Will these people be interacting later? At first, it feels as if bios are being sketched in preparation for a later, dramatic convergence. When the convergence never happens, however, the audience is left trying to mentally backtrack, and to create a new context for the stories from remembered fragments.
Frustratingly, a true common thread never emerges and, though the press materials for the film indicate that its goal is to give those who feel that “all hope for the Middle East is lost” renewed strength, the overall effect is quite the opposite. While it is true that all of its subjects are opposed to the conflict, their reasons are very different, as are their means of fighting the violence. Some are part of a bereaved parents’ group, dedicated to “Sharing Hope" and “Sharing Pain.” Another founded the Movement for Realistic Religious Zionism, while a third works with Seeds of Peace, a group dedicated to bringing children from the two sides together. Along the way, these idealistic, hard-working groups encounter such strenuous, unblinking opposition that even from their resolutely optimistic viewpoints, reconciliation seems impossible.
Some of the figures featured on both sides are true heroes, fighting unquestioningly for concerns bigger then themselves, against unimaginable odds. Watching Damelin force her way, daily, through her still-powerful grief (her son was shot less than two years before we meet her) as she attends protests, appears on television and, in the end, works to meet the mother of her son’s killer, is truly humbling. Similarly, Aboawwad’s easy, incredibly thoughtful commitment to his cause is mind-blowing. He visits wounded Palestinians to tell them about the Israelis who want peace; he speaks with those who are being forced out of their homes by Israelis and calmly, sincerely, explains to them that not all Israelis feel the way their neighbors do. This from a man who, as he says, has been granted “the right to hate” by his jail time and could, if he wanted it, wield tremendous power within his community. Instead, he has chosen to fight quietly, virtually alone, for what he thinks is right.
The problem, of course, is that by the end of Encounter Point, it’s impossible to believe that he and the other assorted fighters have any chance to succeed. While part of this is due to Encounter Point’s lack of organization, the fact is that its scattershot approach probably gives a more realistic view of the conflict than a more professional, slick documentary about the same group of people would have done. In that way, the film’s crippling weakness -- it does, after all, fail to accomplish its stated goal of renewing hope -- becomes its greatest strength.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-06-2006 @ 1:04PM
Elrond Hobbert said...
Whoa for a second I thought this was a feature version of the Star Trek episode, Encounter at Farpoint. Small universe...
Reply
4-29-2006 @ 10:56AM
Audrey said...
I wholeheartedly disagree with the review. First of all, I don't think the purpose of the film is to see how the individual stories necessarily converge. It's not meant to be a neat, packaged narrative. It's depicting a very messy and complicated situation in the Middle East and it would have been dishonest, I think, to portray the peacebuilders' lives as simple and entirely in sync, one with the other. I think the strength of the film is precisely the fact that the peacebuilders come from a wide range of perspectives, and that they approach their non-violence in different ways. What's inspiring is that they are out there, they are struggling against great odds, and they are succeeding, in some instances, in shifting the dialogue. And despite their different perspectives, they do come together on a very significant level. The review never mentions that both Robi and Ali are members of the same Bereaved Families Circle, and that they do "come together" in scenes of friendship as well as scenes where they are each speaking to the media, and strategizing together. They each have different roles to play - Robi works on sensitizing right wing Israelis, and Ali works on sensitizing hardened Palestinians - but both also work on THEMSELVES, and at the end of the day, they come together to share not only their pain, but also their strategies. There are 2 other sets of characters in the film (Israeli, Palestinian) who we witness "meeting" for the first time - we watch them experience personal transformations, in fact, when they are put in a situation of "facing the enemy," so to speak, and building human relationships. There is also an important segment depicting an Israeli and Palestinian team that works on a peace magazine for youth - you can see that the work is difficult, that they do not always see eye to eye, and that their "encounters" can be frustrating. But they DO come together, they do the hard work that's needed to maintain and strengthen their relationship, and they are clearly partners in solidarity. Again, it would have been dishonest to depict their work as easy. There is nothing easy about trying to build peace in the Middle East. But at least this film demonstrates that there are many individuals (who are part of a wide NETWORK of communities) who are pursuing a more constructive and sustainable path. The point of the film, it seems to me, is to expose and highlight their work so as to widen their influence and thereby shift the discourse. But it does not mean that they are isolated individuals who are acting in some kind of vacuum - they are having an impact, one individual and personal transformation at a time. It is significant, I think, that in the Q&A after the premiere of the film, Ali told the audience that one of the most stubborn Palestinians in the film - one who refused to believe that some Israelis are interested in peace - is now a member of the Bereaved Parents Circle, thanks, no doubt, to Ali's tireless efforts at engaging with him and trying to make him aware that there is another way to approach the conflict. All in all, I think this is a profound, deeply moving, and important film. And I encourage anyone who HAS lost hope to check it out. It might not dictate the precise solution to the conflict, but it will demonstrate a sustainable process for getting there.
Reply
4-29-2006 @ 11:04AM
Audrey said...
I posted the above comment - for some reason it says I rated it 0 stars - just for the record - I give it FIVE STARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I don't know how to show that...
Reply
4-29-2006 @ 2:35PM
John said...
Encounter Point is not, from what I gathered, meant to give blind hope to those who feel despair about the realities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In line with what Audrey states (above), such a film would be dishonest at best and pure fluff-fiction at worst. Instead, I think the film is about offering a perspective that few people have ever had the opportunity to explore. It's about challenging the notion that both sides are innately violent, or at least predisposed to aggression, and showing the world that many within both communities are creative, bold, brave and somewhat extraordinary in their attempt to end the cycle of violence and engage the "other".
That for me is hopeful. I don't think any of these characters are the Nelson Mandelas or Ghandis of Israel or Palestine. Nor can I imagine them leading the majority of their respective communities in massive non-violent demonstrations to take down each of their militaristic regimes. The problem with those of us who do not live in the Middle East is that we want (and somehow expect) a catch-all and swift solution to this conflict, (preferably in the form of a 90 minute documentary). In this sense, I think the first blog in this strand didn't quite get the message of the film. Encounter Point is not about *naively* renewing hope. It is instead a very simple, clear and honest message: Some people, on both sides of the Green Line, refuse to accept the violent norm. They have discovered that pain is pain, whether it is felt by a Palestinian mother or Israeli brother. And they are taking extraordinary steps to break the status quo, both within their own hardened communities, and outside their own borders.
So, yes, for me the message is one of hope, but it is also extremely realistic. It's a 'Head OUT of Sand Hope'. I also think that it is the best film on the subject in years, because it moves beyond the blame-game (that endless cycle where two siblings desperately try to convince the mama that the other one started it) and into unexplored territory, where reconciliation and intercommunal cooperation are the hallmarks of a new forward-looking and infinitely brave set of individuals and groups.
The point was really driven home for me when I heard Ali Abu Awwad (at a round table discussion) recount how his community asked him, in incredulity how he could be a non-violence activist, how he could work with (and Lord Forbid, be friends with!) an Israeli. He could be a hero, a martyr, a warrior, gain fame and prestige from having spent years in jail and having been shot in the leg. This, along with revenge and violence, Ali says, is the easier path. The road less traveled, and by far the more arduous, is the one that takes you to the other side, to see the very same suffering but through the 'enemy's' eyes. Even more poignant when he bluntly states that he doesn't have to love Israelis to make peace with them.
I am reminded of my favorite Reggae track by Midnight: Seek Knowledge Before Vengeance. This film brings that message across like no other has in the past.
5 WHOPPING STARS!!
Reply
5-01-2006 @ 8:10PM
Paulo said...
I absolutely agree with Audrey's and John's points from above. I think Fischer completely misinterpeted the intent of this film. Encounter Point was not meant to be a nicely packaged product or a neat little Hollywood docudrama. That would have been insincere, contrived, dishonest. The scene with the Israeli lady and Palestinian man awkwardly sitting across from each other on the stairs, after their meeting had been in doubt; after the lady had expressed fears about driving through the West Bank; after the fellow said that the Israeli lady made him "miserable"; but finally meeting and, in this scene, looking uncomfortably at each other from across the stairs, but at peace with themselves - this scene captures the essence of the movie! That is, a bit unsettling, but poignant, brutally honest, and ultimately revelatory.
Reply