Review: Passion
Filed under: Drama, Foreign Language, Independent, Theatrical Reviews, Other Festivals, Cinematical Indie

When the guy doing the pre-show intro of a festival flick precedes the screening by warning the audience that the ending "should come with Prozac", you know you're not in for an uplifting 90 or so minutes. Actually, I had read the program description of Passion, which was having its North American premiere here in Seattle in the closing days of the Seattle Arab and Iranian Film Festival (an event, by the way, that was so packed with good films, I'm going to have to clear more room off my calendar for it next year), and I knew the topic was honor killings, so I figured going in it wasn't going to have a cheery ending. What I didn't know going in was that the film's director, Mohamed Malas, had to shoot his film in Paris, because the Syrian government wouldn't let him shoot there. The film has been banned in Syria as well, so it won't be seen there, either. Writer-director Malas was inspired to write the film after reading a snippet in a Syrian paper about a woman who was slain by her uncle, two cousins and two brothers in an "honor killing" because she had developed a passion for the songs of Egyptian singer Oum Kalsoum.
Passion tells the tale of Imane, a 30-something woman from a traditional Muslim family who married the man she loved against the wishes of her family, who wanted her to wed her cousin. Imane's husband, Adnane, works as a civil servant and also drives a cab to earn enough money to decently support his wife and children. As the film opens, Imane is speaking in voice-over to her absent brother Rachid, who we soon come to understand has been held in prison for a decade for being an activist against the government. Imane is deeply sorrowful over her brother's imprisonment, and she and her husband have raised Rachid's children, Malek and Joumana, along with their own two children, since Rachid was imprisoned.
One night, Imane's uncle, Abou Sobhi, an aged ex-military colonel kicked out of service due to Rachid's political activities, shows up and forcibly removes Joumana from Imane's home, refusing to tell Imane anything other than that her father's house is a better place for Joumana to live. Abou Sobhi is the younger brother of Imane's father, Abou Rachid, but due to her father's illness and his eldest son's imprisonment, Abou Sobhi has ascended to the top of the family's patriarchy. Abou Sobhi, who has deteriorated mentally since being forced out of the military (and who, really, probably was never really that nice a guy to begin with), takes advantage of his situation by encouraging the men of the family to take greater charge of their households and enforce his particular interpretation of fundamentalist Islam, which seems to pretty much be anything in the Koran he can find to justify brutally turning women into the obedient slaves of men and to laying down the familial law about anything he doesn't like. Unfortunately for Imane, he doesn't like her, or her husband, who is "too interested in politics."
Imane can't figure out why her uncle and her family have turned against her, and neither can we; she is a loving mother, heart torn out by the removal of Joumana, who she considers a daughter, from her home. She is a devoted wife, tenderly caring for her husband, who just as clearly adores her. Their children are well-cared for and happy. What, then, is Imane's sin? Singing. Imane loves music, in particular the music of singer Kalsoum. She has a beautiful voice, and sings all the time as she goes about her daily life, and records tapes to be smuggled to Rachid in prison. Joumana, too, loves to sing, and often sings along with her Auntie as they go about their chores. When Imane stops into a cassette store to find another tape by Oum Kalsoum, she chances to meet a legendary singer, Madame Badia, who, she learns, sang at her own mother's wedding. All this wonderful music fills Imane with a passion and vibrancy for life that radiates from her in spite of the constant undercurrent of sorrow about her brother's imprisonment.
The challenge in watching a film like Passion, as in watching a film about any kind of social injustice, is in separating the perpetrators of the act from the religion or culture that makes them possible. Passion is not an indictment of Islam by any means; on the contrary, it shows many positive aspects of Islamic life in Syria. Passion is an indictment of oppression and terrorism, of religion taken beyond the realm of spirituality and into a fervor that justifies the taking of a life because one man believes a woman in his family has dishonored the family name.
Although you can't blame Islamic culture as a whole for honor killings, any more than you can blame Christianity as a whole for crimes committed in the name of Christianity, Passion does offer a mild rebuke in the way neighbors and passersby shutter out "family matters" -- even those involving murder. But really, are we in the West any different? Do we speak out when we see a child being treated roughly in a public place, or do we bite our tongues while inwardly lamenting our unwillingness to intervene in "somebody else's business?" If we are to judge not lest we be judged, as a certain book suggests, a film like Passion forces us to look not only at the factors that lead to and condone honor killings of Muslim women, but at the hypocrisies within our own lives and cultures. Honor killing is a horrible crime against women, and there are aspects of Islam that make it acceptable, under certain interpretations, to justify the abuse and even murder of women. But so does Christianity, if you literally interpret much of the Old Testament.
Passion is a tragic tale, based on the little known about the real woman who died, whose death was deemed worthy of a mere snippet in the newspaper. The importance of films like Passion is not how they illuminate the differences between "us" and "them" (whoever "us" and "them" is being ever fluid and changing depending on the interpretation and point of view). Their real value lies in the spaces where we can see the similarities, see the injustices that cross political and cultural boundaries.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-28-2006 @ 9:30AM
Emily said...
I saw this film last night at FilmfestDC - Washington, DC's International Filmfest. I was not aware going in that the movie was about an honor killing so I was caught off guard. I am still depressed this morning after seeing the film. Thank you for an excellent write-up. The summary on IMDB is inaccurate but you have explained the film well.
Reply
4-28-2006 @ 10:22AM
Karim said...
Dear Kim,
Much of the stuff you wrote in your commentary is unfortunately baseless and not true. From what I can gather it is based on misguided perceptions.
You claimed that "honor killing" is exclusively an Islamic issue but in fact it is not. The honor killing issue is a complicated phenomenon that spans across cultures and religions. In the Arab world, in places where it occurs most (The Levant area), it occurs among both Arab Muslims and Arab Christians. In India, every year about 5000 brides are burnt to death because their dowries are considered not enough.
you also wrote that "...there are aspects of Islam that make it acceptable, under certain interpretations, to justify the abuse and even murder of women..." but you offered no proof. All scholars agree that there is no basis in Islam for honor killings. Sex outside marriage is sanctioned (for men and women) in Islam but not with capital punishment.
Please keep in mind that Christianity came from the Middle East, from the places you are talking about. Most westerners speak of Christianity vs Islam as if Christianity was a western religion born in Europe.
It is not. Christianity is an Eastern religion, and most Arabs in the Levant who today call themselves Muslims were former Christians. It is their ancestors that founded Christianity.
Hanan Ashrawi, the former Palestinian negotiator, once rebuffed a "western Journalist" trying to play the Islam vs Christianity game by the following:
"I am a Palestinian Christian and I know what Christianity is. I am a descendant of the first Christians in the world, and Jesus Christ was born in my country, in my land. Bethlehem is a Palestinian town".
Cheers
Reply
4-28-2006 @ 12:06PM
Kim Voynar said...
Karim,
Thanks for providing some clarification. When I referred to "honor killings", I was referring specifically to killings of the type that occur in this film: male family members deciding to slay a female family member for some supposed transgression. Burning of brides in India is a totally different subject, albeit an equally tragic one.
I suppose I should have worded the sentence you highlight more specifically; my point was not that Islam as a religion itself specifically encourages honor killings, but that some Muslims use Islam (perhaps I should have specified The Koran) as an excuse for doing committing this atrocity, just as fundamentalist Christians can interpret much of the Bible to justify the oppression of women.
I'm not playing the Islam vs. Christianity game. I'm pointing out that both religions (actually pretty much ANY religion) can be used to justify committing atrocious acts -- war, genocide, patricide, rape, oppression -- in the wrong hands. It's not about the particular religion at all, really. It's about the ego and the moral stage of development of the person wielding religion for his (or her) own gain.
Thanks for your thoughtful comments.
Reply
5-18-2006 @ 1:12PM
Roland said...
Kim, nice writeup, and appropriate comments from others.
I saw this last night at the "Discovering Syrian Cinema" at the Walter Reade theater in New York City.
What is apparent, from reading Malas' comments from the France release, http://www.cineteve.fr/passion/note_real.html,
that this was another version of the film, set in 2000, against the backdrop of president Assad's death.
The version I saw last night did not mention Assad, and instead appeared to be set in early 2003, against the backdrop of preparations for the US invasion of Iraq, and demonstrations against the US in Aleppo. (Imane's husband Adnan listens to news broadcasts about those events and actively watches the ongoing demonstrations.)
I was curious as to which historical framing you saw in the screening you attended. I have been unable (so far) to find any material on the web regarding this apparent newer version of the film.
Thanks,
Roland
Reply
5-18-2006 @ 3:44PM
Kim Voynar said...
Roland,
I wasn't aware there was more than one version of the film. The version I saw was the same one you saw -- the protests Imane's husband was watching were about the American invasion of Iraq.
Now I'm curious to look up info on the other version -- if I find anything out I'll write it up.
Reply