Tribeca Review: 'The War Tapes'
Filed under: Documentary, Independent, Tribeca, Politics, Cinematical Indie

The current Iraq War is possibly the most misreported American military engagement in history. Embed reporters are heavily censored, each network has its own spin, and it's simply not in our government's interest to disseminate details on what's really going on. The driving concept behind The War Tapes is so simple, it's amazing no one's tried it up to this point: attack the media problem head-on by giving soldiers small, consumer quality camcorders and, communicating with them nightly from the US via the internet, allow them to tell their own stories from the center of the conflict. Director Deborah Scranton has managed something that I haven't seen in documentary film or television in a long time. Under her shaping, the selected soldiers aren't particularly brilliant, nor especially brave; they sometimes talk themselves into corners, and sometimes, know exactly what to say; they're sometimes intensely unlikeable, and sometimes, incredibly sympathetic. In other words, the director has managed to shape real people's lives into a drama, without imposing ideological filters, and without sacrificing what makes them real.
The project started when the New Hampshire National Guard offered Scranton (a longtime television news producer) the chance to embed with a unit deploying for Iraq. Scranton asked if she could embed cameras instead. Each of the 180 soldiers in the selected regiment were offered the chance to participate in the project (and, by proxy, to get a crash course in filmmaking for free); ten volunteered, and three were featured in the final project. Scranton sent her crew small DV cameras, and kept in near-constant contact with them via instant messages, giving them tips on shooting concepts and techniques, and talking them through the process of telling the stories of their lives. In turn, the soldiers kept journals, and kept the cameras mounted on their Humvees, capturing everything from car bombs to commissary politics.
The three men featured in the film manage to seem to represent a cross-section of the US military, without ever individually feeling like archetypes. Mike Moriarty is a thirty-something husband and father to two kids; he joined the Guard in a potentially questionable effort to balance out a bout of post-9/11 depression, and though he generally supports both the War and President Bush, he's disillusioned by the lack of progress he sees in Iraq. Steve Pink is a poetry-writing jock who signed up in order to pay for college, and can't get out of Iraq fast enough. "I should really thank God for saving my lucky ass," he writes in his journal. "I’ll do that. Then I’m gonna jerk off." Zack Bazzi, a 24-year-old Lebanese-American veteran of conflicts in Bosnia and Kosovo, is just as cynical about what we're doing in Iraq, but far less agitated about it. "Let’s just leave it alone and leave. Fuck the oil man ... I’ll walk everywhere in the US. I’ll recycle everything, damn it. I’ll even drive a Honda Insight." As he high-fives and chats in Arabic with the Iraqi teens who line the streets selling cigarettes and porn, his combat brothers watch from the Humvee, calling him a traitor and a spy.
Despite their differences, each soldier must deal with increasingly crippling disillusion over the fact that each is a pawn in a conflict that they cannot control. The insurgents, we see, are doing most of their damage by way of Improvised Explosive Devices, or IEDs -- basically, makeshift bombs, sometimes housed within cars, that can go off anywhere or anytime with no warning. The War Tapes is not about the level of the military that attempts to seek out the planters of such devices to prevent (or punish) attacks; when a bomb goes off, it's generally Bazzi, Moriarty, and/or Pink's jobs to drive towards the explosion and clean it up. It's essentially the most dangerous, and most depressing, janitorial job of all time, and it naturally leads to cynicism. At one point, Moriarty asks his Humvee partner what he thinks of Iraq's then-new status as a sovereign nation. The other soldier perfectly parrots the party line about liberation and stability in the region ... and then when Moriarty prompts him to "tell me how you really feel", he says, "Then after that happens maybe we can buy everybody in the world a puppy. "
When not gathering bloody limbs from the roadside, the boys spend large parts of the days acting as security escorts for supply convoys. Essentially, they're traffic cops with big guns -- except, as Bazzi points out, the average city's police force usually does not have the advantage of having "zero training about the culture." The supply convoys are run, like all of the industry surrounding our military in Iraq, by Kellogg, Brown and Root, AKA Halliburton, about whom nobody has anything positive to say. Regardless of their respective political positions, each soldier's personal outlook on the war stands in refutation of the administration's claim that there's positive stuff going on that the media doesn't show, and much of the controllable negative comes directly from Halliburton. We learn that the agency, in which Vice President Cheney has a controlling stake, is gouging our military at every turn, charging the army upwards of $25 per mess hall Styrofoam plate, amongst other crimes.
Adding up the evidence available to them, some of the soldiers have started to think that the administration is dragging out to conflict in order to maximize their personal profits. Moriarty all but suggests that if our leaders really wanted to end this conflict, they'd be "nuking this fucking country" -- or, at the very least, "Shit or get off the pot." In one of the films most stunningly unscripted moments, Steve, back on Cape Cod after a year of duty and clearly rattled with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, stares straight at the camera and asks, "Why the fuck are we there?" The camera holds on him as he continues, his passion and volume progressively heading upwards. "You don’t put 150,000 troops from all over the country in there and say we’re there to create democracy. We’re there to create money, you know?" He takes a swig of beer and, eyes steely, finished the thought. "Somebody other than Dick Cheney better be getting their hands on it pretty soon."
Perhaps contrary to appearances, The War Tapes is not a blatant piece of liberal propaganda. Scranton gives equal time and space to the soldiers' deeply felt patriotism, as well as their empirical dissent. She also looks into how their service affects the women in their lives that they've left behind. Still, it would seem natural that some will walk away from the film energized by the passionate arguments it presents against the current war, whilst others will respond with rage to the very same. Regardless of your political bent, I think we can all agree that no film has ever taken such a direct interest in what "our boys" think and feel. The production values make The War Tapes feel less like a work of art than a work of activism, but that's hardly a complaint. With television news no longer willing and able to perform the kind of public service that helped get us out of Vietnam, The War Tapes is exactly the kind of activism we need.









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-26-2006 @ 7:56PM
Ian said...
I think the phrase "under her shaping" says it all.
Reply
5-01-2006 @ 11:28AM
Kenneth Monahan said...
Just saw this doc last night. I definitely do not agree with most of the ascertains raised by the troops, but I respect and admire them for doing their duty, even when they do not agree with some of the reasons for their being there. The public must realize that the armed forces are enforcers of "policy" we do not "create" it. I also think that the director did not give equal time to differing opinions and in the end you knew what side this film ended up on. The producers said that thousands of hours of footage were filmed...I'd like to some of that...I'm sure most of that didn't have bombs exploding, mangled bodies, starving children, basically you saw overall chaos...If you want us to see the truth...then let's see more footage not just 90 minutes! I'm sure you could get a DVD box set release, make some money and donate it all to charity.
Reply
5-02-2006 @ 1:23PM
Ben Flanders said...
First of all the idea that the soldiers who served with Zack thought of him as a traitor is ludicrous. There is a scene in which Zack is seen spreading goodwill to a group of Iraqi children by teaching them an American staple, the ubiquitous "high five" is voiced over by another soldier suggesting that they are plotting some attack. A high five is exchanged with a confused look on the Iraqi childrens' faces to which the soldier adds, "Yep, the deal is sealed." I laughed when I saw it. The scene comes in a long segment exposing the inadequacies the soldiers feel with such a staggering language barrier. If this is the best the soldiers can do along some country road in Iraq, imagine the difficulties in running checkpoints, finding insurgents, fighting crime, and improving the infastructure of Iraq.
The only thing I can add to the overall discussion is that though the media can be an easy target after watching this film for missing out on some powerful and important stories, I think it is also important to keep in mind that government impunity is paid for by the passivity of its citizens. As much as we admire the soldiers for their tireless effort to see it through their year tour, how much more should we be slogging it out with them and making sure that the high cost of sending soldiers in harms way is balanced with a commensurable level of accountability.
Reply
5-08-2006 @ 4:49PM
Zack Bazzi said...
I am delighted that you did not find any of us ?particularly brilliant, nor especially brave,? I am sure if you were in our shoes you would have been much better, but is a volunteer Army, and you don?t have to be. You can critique safely from back here, but in doing so please at least reveal all the fact and at least get them right. The ?traitor? scene was a joke and that is obvious when you view it, yet you wrote down with out the proper context thus you gave off a different less than desirable impression. There are several more misrepresentations and mischaracterizations in your scribbling. Perhaps your reporting is not ?particularly brilliant??
Reply
5-09-2006 @ 1:18PM
Karen Cringoli said...
I am glad Zack commented and set the traitor scene straight from his first hand knowledge.
I believe the film was objective - but not everyone who viewed it was.
I am glad Zack commented and set the traitor scene straight from his first hand knowledge.
I believe the film was objective - but not everyone who viewed it was.
No matter - those soldiers were not trying to send a particular message in the film - they were simply sharing their stories and experiences. They don't want your sympathy or cries of outrage - they want your understanding. And if this film does nothing else it allows you the chance to give that to them - because most come home changed and greatly misunderstood. This was their chance to take us on their journey so we might not fight about whether or not they should be there - but rather be able to support them properly and understand when they come back.
Reply
5-18-2006 @ 12:36AM
Huntress said...
Karina Longworth is right when she says Deb Scranton, the director, didn't impose her idealogical filters -too bad the same can't be said for Karina's review of this exceptionally honest, non partisan, evocative documentary. She's incapable of grasping that the
traitor scene was an obvious joke, and incapable of understanding why Mike re enlisted after Sept 11th, yet has the audacity to describe these soldiers as "not particularly brilliant"....and inspite of the
fact that they willingly put their lives on the line in Iraq to fight an enemy so evil they deliberately target children, an enemy hell bent on subjucating and/or killing anyone who doesn't live under their theocracy, these soldiers, according to the uber brilliant Karina, aren't "especially brave".
I guess when you're blinded by your own
agenda it's damn near impossible to recognize truth, discern fact from your own self created fiction, and grasp the point of the film!
Reply