Tribeca Review: East Broadway
Filed under: Comedy, Independent, Romance, Tribeca, Theatrical Reviews, Cinematical Indie
Back when it was called Social Grace, East Broadway, Fay Ann Lee’s debut future, was listed as the directorial debut of
B. D. Wong. At some point very, very late in production,
“artistic differences” grew up between Wong and the producers, and he was replaced as director by Lee, the
film’s writer and star. Subsequently, Wong request that his name be completely removed from the movie’s
credits, despite the fact that he plays a major supporting role. You could say, then, that it’s fair to describe
East Broadway as a “troubled production.” It also fair to say that this minor controversy is by
the far the most interesting thing about the film, a lightweight Cinderella story set in and around New York’s
Chinatown.In addition to writing and (sort of) directing East Broadway, Lee also stars in the film as Grace Tang, a single, 30-something Chinese-American woman who has spent most of her life trying to escape her poor, Chinatown past. Even as a financially secure, well-established adult, she still pursues her childhood dream of acceptance by those she considers her social superiors: her current dream is to be part of the unattainable Park Avenue elite, attending regular benefits, charity auctions, and opulent balls. To that end, she crams furiously on opera in order to be well-prepared for an opera-related benefit to which she’s wrangled an invitation.
It is while at the opera event that Grace is mistaken for a member of Hong Kong’s Tang family, the creators of up-scale clothing line Shanghai Tang, and immediately esteemed by the assembled rich, lily-white masses. Because this is a movie, Grace doesn’t bother to correct the misunderstanding and, before she knows it, is involved with Andrew Harrington, Jr. (Queer as Folk's Gale Harold) a lawyer she meets at the party. Andrew is the perfect Prince Charming: wealthy, caring (except towards his girlfriend, whom he doesn’t bother to tell about Grace), and with a social conscience -- he works in the federal prosecutor’s office and is trying to close Chinatown sweatshops. As played by Harold, he’s also miserably bland, and he and Lee’s Grace have embarrassingly little chemistry. Their scenes together are painfully stilted, and often sound as if they were produced by a Cinderella-movie writing machine, including lines like “I’ve never met anyone like you before!”, and “I couldn’t believe that someone like you could ever be with someone like me.”
After a few minor, entirely predictable pitfalls and twists, the movie ends up right were youd expect, and everyone lives happily ever after. However, despite the fact that the plot constantly dramatizes the two worlds Grace straddles -- she is wealthy, and lives on the Upper East Side, while her much-loved Chinese-speaking parents still live in a tiny Chinatown apartment -- the difference between her background and that of her dream man is mentioned only once in the film. Given the visual and thematic emphasis on Grace’s inner conflict, one wonders of the decision to almost completely remove discussion of class and race from the movie’s script wasn’t the source of the conflict between Wong and East Broadway’s producers. Even in very brief interviews back when he was director, Wong tended to foreground class difference and Grace’s social ambitions when he discussed the story, and those things are hardly mentioned in the film as it exists today.
These rather significant complaints aside, however, there’s a charming lack of seriousness to the film that renders it surprisingly watchable (as opposed to other weak first features with Tribeca premieres). Lee is reasonably convincing as Grace, and the supporting cast -- the best of which is Ken Leung who, as Grace’s younger brother Ming, outshines bigger names Roger Rees, Christine Baranski, and Margaret Cho -- adds some heft and interest to the film. While I wouldn’t recommend passing up anything to see East Broadway, if you’re a Tribeca addict with a free time slot, you could do worse than take in this harmless romantic comedy.









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-30-2006 @ 12:58AM
mrd in nyc said...
In the 2nd para, you write: "In addition to writing and (sort of) directing East Broadway, Wong also stars in the film as Grace Tang, a single, 30-something Chinese-American woman..."
I assume you mean Fay Ann Lee rather than B.D. Wong, else I'd think this was a remake of M. Butterfly.
Reply
4-30-2006 @ 6:07AM
Martha Fischer said...
Thanks, mrd -- it's been corrected.
Reply
4-30-2006 @ 11:15AM
T. said...
I'm sorry, but Asian guys get a really bum rap in the movies. All they get to do is kick ass. But as far as romance and drama productions go, ever since Joy Luck Club they get portrayed as chauvinist or backwards pigs that oppress Asian women until they get a chance to get "rescued" by a benign handsome white man. I'm really not interested in seeing yet another self-hating Asian woman work out her issues in print or on celluloid.
Maybe I'm unfairly prejudging this movie, but based on this review I don't think so.
Reply
4-30-2006 @ 12:43PM
ddb in Manhattan said...
The "most interesting thing about the film" I see next week, whatever it is, might be a multi-car pileup on the way to the cineplex. That won't be any fault of the film. Car pileups are pretty interesting. Much as I hate to quibble with an informative and well-written review, I'm not sure about the appropriateness of reviewing the production's history and using the film to illustrate aspects of it. A dogfight is a dogfight, and the film is the film. Although Ms. Fischer is intrigued by the possibility that relevant social commentary of the kind Wong favored might help the film, the proof of the pudding may be in this "These rather significant complaints aside, however, there’s a charming lack of seriousness to the film that renders it surprisingly watchable (as opposed to other weak first features with Tribeca premieres)." Wong's cut might have been one of those "other weak first features." From the accounts of contributors to the IMDB message boards who claim to be familiar with it, Wong's cut was amateurish, and his interest in sociology weighed down a confectionary tale, and was not in sync with Lee's original vision, or with what she actually wrote. Those who saw the film at Tribeca, however, attest that the audience ate it up -- made the right noises in the right places, and applauded lustily. This may not be a perfect film, but it seems to be an unpretentious one and if a good time is had by all, then maybe that's because not everybody in the world either knows or cares whether the film had one director or two, or where any bodies are buried.
Reply
4-30-2006 @ 4:40PM
Gavin said...
You say that the lawyer, played by Gale Harold, was played in a "bland" fashion, yet you did not explain IN WHAT WAY the character was bland, or what about Harold's performance caused the character to appear "bland." What about the fashion in which Harold portrayed the character caused the character to appear "bland?"
Gavin
Reply
5-01-2006 @ 12:46PM
ddb in NYC said...
[quote]I'm sorry, but Asian guys get a really bum rap in the movies. All they get to do is kick ass. But as far as romance and drama productions go, ever since Joy Luck Club they get portrayed as chauvinist or backwards pigs that oppress Asian women until they get a chance to get "rescued" by a benign handsome white man. I'm really not interested in seeing yet another self-hating Asian woman work out her issues in print or on celluloid.[/quote]There's no indication I'm aware of that Grace in the film has been treated badly by Asian men, or that Asian men are portrayed unsympathetically in the film. Unless you are simply opposed to interracial relationships, I don't see how the film fits your template. Even in "The Joy Luck Club," one of the women does end up with a nice, sympathetic Asian man. I'm not in a position to say whether Asian women in the west have a beef against Asian men, but I'm certainly supportive of any Asian female who wants to offer an honest critique of sexual politics among Asians, based on her own experience and observation. If she has some unpleasant things to say, I'm not going to dismiss her points saying those are "her issues" -- any more than I'm going to do that with Alice Walker, who was absolutely vilified by a lot of black men for writing "The Color Purple." In any case, I don't believe a "self-hating Asian woman" could get a movie made, given all that self-hatred. And even if Fay Ann Lee showed hostility towards Asian men in the film, I'm not going to interpret that as self-hatred. I'm from the south, and I'm not particularly into tractor pulls or country and western music. Do I hate myself?
The movie business in America may be tough on Asian men as love objects (and black men too, and Hispanic men, and any men who stand apart from the dominant culture), but not as tough as you suggest, and however tough Asian men have it, please don't blame the plight of those actors on Asian women. It's not every day that a Fay Ann Lee makes a movie. Even Russell Wong, who was very unsympathetic in "The Joy Luck Club," got to do "Eat a Bowl of Tea." As for TV, Russell Wong has had two TV series now, one of which was successful even though both were terrible. And Daniel Dae Kim on "Lost" is probably setting plenty of hearts a-flutter. Ian Anthony Dale on "Surface" was a heart throb, even though he was a villain and a murderer. We saw a very tender scene between him and his girlfriend. Could things be better? Sure. They could also be better for Asian actresses, in case you haven't noticed.
Reply
5-07-2006 @ 8:00PM
Grimace said...
In my 5 years of going to the Tribeca Film festival (seeing about 10 films each year), this was by far the WORST film I have ever watched in the festival, and I actually walked out of the theater after giving this film a chance for the first 70 minutes. How this movie wound up getting accepted into the festival is beyond me - but it seemed much more suited as a 2nd rate TV after school special then a featured film in the Tribeca Film Festival. A Cheesy/incredibly predictable story, horrible writing, and unconvincing acting helped make this movie the trash that it was.
Even though the film is a romantic comedy, lines such as ?I?ve never met anyone like you before!? and many others similar to this helped induce utter nausea. Aside from a funny comment or two made by the Chinatown family - all of the other lines were horribly formulized of the very predictable, as they could have been written by a first generation ?romantic comedy writing machine?.
The acting was a 2 out of 10. The relationship and 'love out of no where' was not believable at all. Harold's role as a city prosecutor in the DA's office but also a rich-socialite on the side did not make sense and was unconvincing. And even minor details such the kids in Chinatown (where I used to live) - being totally Americanized and speaking in the manner they do is 100% inaccurate.
Overall, after walking out of the theater mid-film, I felt ripped off, robbed, and that I was lacking a decent amount of brain cells that I possessed on my way in. Avoid this film at ALL COSTS! 0/10.
Reply
5-08-2006 @ 12:59PM
ddb in NYC said...
"Harold's role as a city prosecutor in the DA's office but also a rich-socialite on the side did not make sense and was unconvincing."
What's unconvincing about that? John F. Kennedy Jr. was a New York City assistant district attorney from 1989 to 1993. The part is based on him. In any case, if this is really the worst film you've ever seen, you haven't lived. I saw the final showing on Friday, and the audience loved it. It was in a large auditorium at Loew's Lincoln Plaza, which was almost filled. Not only did people not walk out, they applauded at the end and stayed for the Q&A. No rude questions were asked, and many compliments were paid. The Chinese-Americans in the audience particularly liked it.
Reply
5-21-2006 @ 3:56PM
Lori Jones said...
The movie isn't good or bad. It's just boring.I imagine one could concoct a believable plot about a Chinese woman longing to be part of NYC's rich Wasp social set that might make me care about her situation but this movie made me sleepy.
I'm a Gale Harold fan and want desperately to see him have a great career, so, I'm glad this awful movie has come and gone. I'm not Asian-American but I was never sure why this financially well off, educated Chinese woman embarrassed herself and her family by allowing her deception to continue, even to the point of introducing her family...the most non-funny disrespectful act I've ever witnessed...to her new friend as the Wongs.
I think BD Wong did himself a favor by leaving this movie in the hands of Fay Ann Lee.
Reply