A Dracula Sequel that Might Not Suck
Filed under: Classics, Drama, Horror, Deals, Fandom, Newsstand, Remakes and Sequels
Back in December, we totally failed to pick
up the news that someone had written a screenplay for a sequel
to Dracula. Whatever, right? Hollywood has sequel-itis, and a whole lot of the results suck. It turns out,
though, that the film, entitled Un Dead, is the first Dracula movie to win the approval of author Bram
Stoker's family since Tod Browning's 1931 masterpiece. Not only that, but it was written by a gentleman
named Ian Holt who, according to the always-reliable internets, is a Dracula scholar, and actually traveled around
Europe, scouting locations while he wrote. Plus, it's NOT a sequel to Francis Ford Coppola's Dracula, but rather to Stoker's original story. I don't know about
you, but I'm suddenly feeling quite intrigued.Variety is just reporting the story today (which is fine because, well, so are we), which probably means that all the dotted lines are finally signed, and that the project might actually be getting off the ground. Action king Jan de Bont (he's busy right now directing Meg -- fear his power) will produce the film, which picks up 25 years after the end of Dracula and brings all the surviving characters together, along with an Inspector Cotford, who appeared in Stoker's original draft of Dracula, but was cut prior to the story's publication.












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-04-2006 @ 10:33AM
Geoff said...
I recall that Coppola's version was pretty faithful to the book, was it not?
Reply