Tom Cruise Back in the Iron Man Mix
I want to gouge my eyes out with a spoon even as I begin writing this story, but since I'm your faithful geek-beat reporter, I'm going to grit my teeth and bear it long enough to bring you the news -- I apologize in advance for any pain/suffering this information may bring to any True Believers reading.Okay, I'll just throw it out there and get it over with quick. They're talking about Tom Cruise for Iron Man again. There, I said it. Yeah, I know he said he didn't want the role any more, but that was at LEAST a year ago, which in Hollywood time is enough time for several lifespans worth of events to happen. And Moviehole brings us the unfortunate news of Cruise perhaps being interested in the project again. And yes, despite MI3's mild disappointment, the dude is still viewed as box office GOLD, so if he wants the part it'd be hard for Paramount to turn him down. Favreau has already said he would prefer a newer, fresh faced actor ... but he could easily be outvoted by the people with the money.
Tom Cruise is too short*, too recognizable, and too crazy to be allowed anywhere near Tony Stark. He's too much Tom Cruise right now. By that I mean not only is he crazily recognizable, he's been all over the news every day for at least a year. If he was in Iron Man, the role would clearly be "Tom Cruise as Iron Man" for everyone who watched. Fav's got it right looking for someone with less star power.
*Cruise is 5'7'' and Stark is over 6' tall. Yes, it's only a difference of half a foot, but it's been driving me nuts since the dude was first connected with the part several years ago ... before he became the crazy couch jumper he is now.









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-11-2006 @ 1:13PM
Joseph said...
I agree 100%, Cruise would be a horrible choice. They need to find someone, like Christian Bale in Batman Begins, who can sell the part, not consume the part!
Reply
5-11-2006 @ 1:28PM
Cath said...
I agree with Joseph. They were been able to sell superhero pics without having to drop 25 mil for a name. Now that the audience for such films has grown, there's really no excuse for not digging into the plethora of fine up and comings.
Reply
5-11-2006 @ 1:35PM
jimmy said...
a younger Tom Selleck would work. or maybe Matthew Fox
Reply
5-11-2006 @ 1:41PM
tracy said...
Look at photos of Cruizy ( Cruise and Crazy ) next to people whose heights are known. If he's an inch above 5' 3" I have a chance with Nicole Kidman.
Reply
5-11-2006 @ 1:45PM
Mark Beall said...
Ha. You may be right, Tracy. I really have no idea, I was just going by CelebHeights.com records.
Reply
5-11-2006 @ 1:54PM
Chaim said...
Nooooooooooooooo! Somebody has to stop this. It's a disaster. One of my biggest problems with Daredevil was that it had Afflack. Tom Cruise is deranged. He should be playing a baddie who gets bumped off in the first 5 minutes of the movie.
Please Mr. Favreau, if you are reading this, don't do this to the fans.
Reply
5-11-2006 @ 1:55PM
Stephen Prescott said...
yeah a fresh face would be good, but the guy has got to be older and almost a little burned out. this is tony stark we are talking about here. someone like a george clooney type but maybe not george clooney himself cuz i don't know if he could pull it off.
Reply
5-11-2006 @ 2:18PM
afs said...
I know I don't want to see Vince Vaughn or Ron Livingston (or Faizon Love, for that matter) as Iron Man either.
I like Jon Favreau a lot. I catch "Dinner for Five" on IFC whenever I can. That said, if Jon has a problem, it's a little too much loyalty to his buds. I have a feeling Favreau's casting list for the title role may be significantly too short entering the process. I'd rather see Tom Cruise than Vaughn or Livingston.
Overall, I'd probably pick Viggo Mortensen. The role of Tony Stark requires someone that can easily alternate between looking fit one minute, and like they are death's door the next, due to Stark's heart problems . Mortensen has the kind of facial features that can be made to look like a death mask with minimal makeup.
Reply
5-11-2006 @ 2:25PM
John said...
Mickey Rourke maybe?
He's fit yet thanks to puffing cancer sticks all his life can be made to look like hell in no time...
Reply
5-11-2006 @ 3:36PM
Mark said...
I know its not relevant but...I can't believe CelebHeights.com actually EXISTS
Reply
5-11-2006 @ 4:07PM
ThePete said...
Wow--so much for that MySpace page Fav set up... I and loads of other IM fans posted our casting suggestions and I'm pretty sure most of us were against Cruise. Besides, everyone knows that ultimately it doesn't matter who's in the picture just so long as it has advertising out the wazoo. If the movie fail to get people in theater seats after the right advertising it's not going to matter who is in it, at least, in my opinion.
Ugh...I can just imagine Tom Cruise's absurd, possessed acting "style" as Tony Stark. "I'M just having a few drinks! What's wrong with THAT?"
Cruise's Stark would make Shatner's Kirk seem like Stewart's Picard.
Wow, I haven't said something that uber-geeking in quite some time... but anyone who saw Cruise all-too-enthusiastically describe traffic pattern analyzation in MI3 knows I'm right...
Reply
5-11-2006 @ 4:21PM
josh said...
The height issue is a non-issue, it's hollywood. People said similar things about Michael Keaton, too. He did okay.
That said, Cruise would not be my choice, either. I always saw Stark not as a pretty-boy.
Reply
5-11-2006 @ 4:26PM
Kevin said...
I thought Sam Rockwell would have been a good choice, but I think he is maybe too short. How tall is Nicolas Cage?
Reply
5-11-2006 @ 4:26PM
DJ Erickson said...
I wouldn't mind Cruise in the role of Tony Stark if he could play more than one character: the asexual, tightly wound, humourless guy he's been playing for about a decade or so.
Going with a talented, lower profile actor is the best course for movies like this. Hugh Jackman *is* Wolverine in X-men (and one of the very few things I actually like in those movies), and Christian Bale was great as Bruce Wayne/Batman (too bad the costume was so damned ugly). And back in the day, Christopher Reeve *was* Superman; I don't think he needed sculpted muscles on his costume, either.
Keep Cruise away from Iron Man for God's sake.
Reply
5-11-2006 @ 5:57PM
Ted said...
I have an out of no where idea, how about Brad Pitt. He has the charisma to pull off the roll without people laughing it off behind his back.
Reply
5-11-2006 @ 11:54PM
DJ Erickson said...
I never considered Brad Pitt for the role, but if they're going to go with a name actor, I really wouldn't mind him; but I think I'd have trouble suspending my disbelief and accepting him as a technological genius, though.
Reply
5-12-2006 @ 3:37AM
Edmond said...
I barely remember the Iron Man cartoon so I googled Tony Stark and the first thing that came to mind was Howard Hughes then Leonardo DiCaprio which I have a hard time seeing as Iron Man. I wonder if Hollywood is gonna try and keep actors to only one comic character so that they can do cross overs... ie: I wouldn't mind seeing a Superman/Batman crossover.
Reply
5-12-2006 @ 3:37AM
Finished.Law.School said...
This film will flop if Cruise comes anywhere near it. Keep the crazy cult members away!
Reply
5-12-2006 @ 12:24PM
John said...
Or Nick Cage with a moustache....or Billy Zane maybe..
Reply
5-21-2006 @ 11:55PM
John said...
Oded Fehr!!!! PERFECT FOR THE FREAKEN PART! He played in The Mummy and The Mummy Returns! He was Ardeth Bay in those movies. Fits the part to the T!
Reply