Scene Stealers: Gene Hackman, The Quick and the Dead
Filed under: Fandom, Scene Stealers
Our original plan was to mount a weekly series in which we'd applaud a different character actor with each new column. But it seems that this was SUCH a good idea that someone else beat us to the punch ... by about six years. So the Cine-Squad decided to take our "J.T. Walsh Award" and morph it into a feature called "Scene Stealers," which will celebrate great actors and actresses who have A) stolen entire movies with their awesomeness, B) popped up in a particularly juicy cameo or supporting role, or C) salvaged a failed movie simply by being a member of the cast.For our inaugural Scene Stealers feature, I chose to celebrate Mr. Gene Hackman, mainly because he's my very favorite actor, but also because ... well, have you guys ever actually seen Sam Raimi's The Quick and the Dead?
Released in February of 1995, The Quick and the Dead was the movie Sam Raimi did between Army of Darkness and A Simple Plan, and it absolutely reeks of old-school Western geekiness. Sort of a "greatest hits album" of Western movie clichés, The Quick and the Dead stars Sharon Stone, Leonardo Di Caprio, Russell Crowe, Gary Sinise, about a dozen fantastic character actors ... and Mr. Gene Hackman, clearly having a BALL as the uber-villainous town father John Herod.
It's almost sinful how much fun Hackman is having here, as if someone gave him a chance to revisit his Oscar-winning role in Unforgiven -- only this time he's playing it very broad, very sly and with tongue planted firmly in cheek. Herod goes from beating down a priest to abusing his only son to shooting practically everyone in town ... plus he has this one drop-dead brilliant sequence in which he gets to open-hand slap Sharon Stone right in the face! (It's awesome, trust me.)
Mr. Hackman's career is, of course, packed to the rafters with effortlessly excellent performances, but his work in The Quick and the Dead still stands as one of my very favorites. It's great to see a seasoned pro chomping into a mega-villain role with so much oily smoothness and uni-faceted hatefulness, and even in a movie absolutely swollen with colorful performances, Hackman still reigns supreme.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-15-2006 @ 10:42AM
Christine Chapman said...
Not only have I seen "The Quick And The Dead", I actually count it among my favorite tough chick flicks. When I need an estrogen laced kick in the rear, I watch it or "GI Jane" (which although a different genre, has Viggo Mortenson in a 'hackman-esque' role).
Leonardo was all over the place in the film, chewing scenery at an alarming rate. And Russel Crowe gave a hint of the understated performance of rage that was to come in "Gladiator".
Many people have panned "The Quick And The Dead", and I have always disagreed. Thanks for giving me a place to do so publicly.
Reply
5-15-2006 @ 11:03AM
Alex Keen said...
A very underrated flick...
Reply
5-15-2006 @ 11:12AM
josh said...
Good movie. Bruce Campbell (he played a minor character whose scenes were deleted) has some interesting anecdotes about Hackman and Raimi's interactions with each other in "If Chins Could Kill", his autobiography. Apparently Hackman wasn't super-pleased about being directed by the (at the time) wet behind the ears Raimi. Also, director Mick Garris plays a bit part in this.
Reply
5-15-2006 @ 11:29AM
gl2748 said...
I think that the "quick and the dead" is the latter...dead. Gene Hackman is not having a ball. He is squirming under the pantiness of this lame paycheck movie. A paycheck movie for Stone and for Hackman. If he steals any scenes it's because they're there for the taking. A "best of" more like a sickly sweet concentrate of cheries plundered from the great western canon. LAME.
Reply
5-15-2006 @ 12:56PM
George Myers, Jr. said...
I thought it under-rated "vengeance's is hers" film. Wasn't the money? I still wonder who was chasing Custer after all those years, if at all, one of these guys? Some of the "shots" seemed from a dime novel illustration, the close-ups in particular, maybe a tribute to them, the forerunner to comic books? One novel "Give a Man a Gun" I'd like to see them all in.
Reply
5-15-2006 @ 2:29PM
josh said...
That story is close to the one in Campbell's book, daj. Except in his book, it's teh same situation but instead of cursing at Raimi, Raimi explains the script reason for each thing Hackman doesn't want to do, so Hackman agrees.
Reply
5-15-2006 @ 5:49PM
daj said...
Hmmm...thanks josh.
I just read that bit in Bruce Campbell's book (courtesy of Amazon's 'Search in Book' facility). I guess the truth might lie somewhere in between the 2 related stories. One's a little too colourful, and the other's a little too polite !
Reply
10-30-2007 @ 11:17AM
daj said...
This is one of my guilty pleasures. It's a hoot.
And all credit to Mr. Hackman for producing such a delightful not-quite-over-the-top performance when he really didn't want to do the role. Apparently he kept saying "no" until he gave in.
But PLEASE don't link Herod to Little Bill - they are totally different roles.
Intersting story here, buried in an interview with John Moore (Behind Enemy Lines) who talked to Sam Raimi...
http://www.empireonline.com/interviews_and_events/Interview.asp?IID=93&CurrentPage=2
Reply