Thailand Censors to Da Vinci Code: No Ending or No Release
Filed under: Action, Drama, Thrillers, Mystery & Suspense, Sony
What would be worse for you, seeing a blockbuster movie with no conclusion, or not seeing the movie at all? Thailand's film censorship board has declared that it's one or the other for The Da Vinci Code, which is scheduled for release there on Thursday. So far we've heard about the protests, the lawsuits, the boycotts, the calls for disclaimers and the attempts to ban the film by offended religious parties, but would Thailand really show the movie without its final 10 minutes? It seems so. Thus far, distributor Columbia TriStar Buena Vista (Thailand) has not made any official decision on what they will do with the picture.
I haven't read the book. I doubt that I'll see the movie. But right now I'm curious what is so sacrilegious in that last few minutes. I mean, the whole film is an issue with Christians all over. So, if they are willing to release the rest of the film, sans end, and be okay, then there must be something even more extremely blasphemous than we're already aware of. What could it possibly be?
And for a follow up question, what would produce more complaints: The Da Vinci Code shown in its entirety in Thailand, or X-Men: The Last Stand shown all over the world without its ending?
Update: After an appeal from the distributor, the Film Censorship Board has decided to show the film uncut, a decision made by a vote of 6-5. The subtitles will instead be rewritten and a disclaimer will show at the beginning of the film, declaring it to be a work of fiction.












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-17-2006 @ 9:54AM
Todd Trowbridge said...
You blog for one of the best movie review websites and you're not going to see this movie? What is the matter with you? Are you too stuck up to see a movie because it has so much buzz? So sad.
Todd
Reply
5-17-2006 @ 10:01AM
Christopher Campbell said...
Well, the thing is, that I don't have to see it. James will see it. Why would I want to see it?
And now that the reports are in at how much of a joke it is, I'm even less inclined to do so.
Why is it that people think we critics have time to watch every single film in the history of cinema? We are permitted to have other lives, you know.
Reply
5-17-2006 @ 11:53AM
LRS62 said...
I gotta agree with Todd. Sometimes "you" (the writers on this site) continually say "you aren't going to see it", yet comment on anything else regarding a certain movie. Call me old-fashioned, but I would rather have someone with an interest in the film, good or bad, commenting on it. If you say James is going to see the film, then why isn't HE commenting on this controversy? I may be just talking out my ass, but half the time there seems to be some kind of reverse snobbery in what you folks seem to deem worthy of talking about.
Reply
5-17-2006 @ 3:05PM
Christopher Campbell said...
I'm commenting on it because, although I don't have much interest in seeing the film, I am intrigued now about that last ten minutes.
anyway, what is "bad interest"? is that not the same as my disinterest?
I'm not a snob, I'm just not interested in seeing every film that comes out. And I don't need to follow the culture machine, either. Honestly, I can go see some Altman films I haven't seen at the Museum of the Moving Image for free this weekend. So, I'd rather do that. You wouldn't?
Reply