Review: See No Evil
Filed under: Horror, Lionsgate Films, Theatrical Reviews

I've never been a big fan of what's known as "professional wrestling," so please forgive me if I don't greet the big-screen debut of a rassler called Kane with much enthusiasm. I am, however, a pretty staunch supporter of the horror genre, so I did hold out some hope that WWE Films could cobble together a half-decent slasher flick. To say that that hope was misguided is an understatement on par with "Michael Jackson is mildly creepy."
WWE's debut effort (and I use the word "effort" charitably) is called See No Evil, a shamelessly derivative and helplessly inept piece of genre flotsam that rips off everything from Friday the 13th to Saw 2 -- and does so in only the most tiresome and unremarkable fashion imaginable. This flick sounds like it was written by a mommy-hating nine-year-old who just discovered the joys of pointless profanity, looks like it was shot inside of an abandoned Motel 6, and feels precisely like the cynical, careless, and flimsy piece of plagiarism it so obviously is. While some horror flicks use their gritty, grungy exteriors to set a mood and create some tension, See No Evil is more than content to wander around its unconvincing soundstage, doling out nothing but atrocious acting and/or writing, desperately hoping that a small contingent of slasher supporters and wrestling aficionados will care enough to see what the thing has to offer. (Which ain't much.)
Try not to giggle as I break the plot down for you: We open with a cop getting his arm chopped off by a serial killer, but not before the cop nails his attacker with a bullet to the brain. Flash forward a few years and the (now one-armed) cop is in charge of a group of photogenic young criminals ... and together they're all going to clean up a decrepit old hotel! Needless to say, the same old lunatic is already in residence at the Blackwell Hotel, and he won't chill down until he's thrown a few hooks into his unwelcome visitors. Oh, and he loves to collect eyeballs. Try not to chuckle out loud when the Act III flashback parade explains the whole eyeball thing.
Now, seeing as I've spent more than 25 years salivating over the spookiest and most gruesome horror flicks ever made, I didn't go into See No Evil expecting some sort of Merchant Ivory-style period piece or a plot-heavy masterpiece stuffed with Mametesque chit-chat ... but See No Evil was already produced about five dozen times between the years of 1978 and 1990, and absolutely nothing has been done this time around to give the genre fans something fresh or exciting to sink their teeth into. Oh yeah, the stalker is played by a wrestler called Kane. There's your fresh twist, I suppose. (The fact that See No Evil's serial stalker is only slightly more horrifying than, say, Sloth from The Goonies is not exactly a good thing.)
The cast is a mixed bag of Americans and Australians, none of whom are talented or experienced enough to escape from this mire with a gold star pinned to their lapel. As a matter of fact, you won't find one likable character in the whole damn movie -- which makes sense because See No Evil exists not to scare you, but to have you cheer appreciatively whenever the next smug little asshole gets a rusty hook wedged beneath his jawbone. Former porn director Gregory Dark so desperately wants to ape the Saw series' visual gimmickry that he clearly has no time or inclination to mount anything even remotely atmospheric or intense or (gasp) scary. In the hands of a more
(Mr. Dark's career goes from A) hardcore porn to B) softcore Skinemax to C) Britney Spears videos to D) horror flicks bankrolled by Wrestling. Whether he's moving up or down in the filmmaking industry is entirely up to you ... but if See No Evil looks and sounds like a porn flick (and it does), only with a decidedly different style of "penetration," I guess now we know why.)
The screenplay is an endless litany of hateful banter and middle-school-style quips of desperate vulgarity; the editorial approach could be best described as "on shuffle;" and the performances from stem to stern are aggressively inadequate. In an effort to mask his flick's relative worthlessness, Dark tries to amp up the Gore Factor (taking special care to really abuse the female characters while the male victims get off relatively easily), but it's pretty clear that the MPAA had a field day censoring this mindless abortion. I suppose we should feel grateful that the rating board snipped a few moments from this mercilessly awful horror flick, but even at 81 minutes, See No Evil is about 71 minutes too long.
I cannot speak for the wrestling fans, because for all I know they might see Kane's cinematic debut as the next coming of Clint Eastwood, but the big lug just waddles through the movie with a chain in his hand and a hole in his head -- and frankly I think the performance is pretty darn embarrassing. But I can speak as a serious and passionate Horror Geek, and as such I am offering fair warning to all my carnage-lovin' colleagues out there: This thing is even worse than most of those direct-to-video horror junkpiles that you find littering the dusty end of the Blockbuster shelf. If See No Evil is a good indication as to what WWE Films has to offer down the road, I think I just found another reason to continue ignoring "professional wrestling."










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-19-2006 @ 10:14AM
Peter said...
Good review of a movie I'll never see, but what's funnier than I'm sure the end product actually is, is how serious Gregory Dark thinks he is. If you really want a laugh, read just even a little bit of Arrow in the Head's interview with him. One of my favorite parts, in regards to his directorial influences:
"In terms of regular directors, David Lynch, (Jean-Luc) Godard, for editing styles; I?m a big post production sort of maven and editing styles and why scenes would play a certain way for French new wave."
I won't spam Cinematical with a train of 'ha ha's, but it wouldn't be out of place...
Reply
5-19-2006 @ 12:11PM
Justin said...
I saw this film last night and thought it was very entertaining. It doesn't take itself too seriously and is really just a fun, frivolous ride -- horror eye candy. The acting was good and Kane made a fantastic killer. For a better review, read the See No Evil review from EricDSnider.com. While he doesn't praise the film, he seems to understand this film a lot better.
Reply
5-19-2006 @ 1:01PM
Peter said...
I hate to come off as some Cinematical fanboy here, because really I'm just some guy who respects good writing, but that review you (Justin) pointed to doesn't show any 'better understanding' of the film than the above review, but rather far less understanding. And to add insult to injury, that reviewer is the kind of person whose blind support is encouraging trends that continue to suck the life out of the genre: "You go because you WANT to see the same thing every time."
That is sure as shit not why I, or anyone else I know, goes to the movies. I realize I'm a little more critical of the genre than most people, but mindless stupidity is still mindless stupidity. There is a HUGE difference between meticulously crafting a film so it's entertaining at the most primal level, such as James Gunn did with his Slither and DoTD scripts, and just watching every horror movie from the last decade and then regurgitating the bits you thought were cool back into a bucket so you can pour it on the audience.
Sorry for going off on a little rant there, especially since it's in regards to comments on another site, but oh well.
Reply
5-19-2006 @ 3:30PM
Scott Weinberg said...
1. So because Eric agrees with you, his is a better review? Cool.
2. Snider happens to be one of my best friends, so it's not a comparison that hurts my feelings one iota. :)
Thanks for the comments, guys!
Reply
5-19-2006 @ 7:56PM
JohnnyG said...
Well, I would never be turned away from a movie because someone that I don't know doesn't recommend it.
So, I'm really looking forward to seeing it in a couple of days and really enjoyed the previews. I'm a bit of an old-school horror man, so I hope it rips off Friday the 13th Part 2 more than Saw 2.
Reply
5-20-2006 @ 3:17AM
The Artist Version 1.0 said...
Ok,Didnt even read the full review, but being a part time independet WRESTLER myself, EVERY wrestler that has stepped into the ring HATES the term "rassler" we dont like it and it is degrading!!!
Reply
5-20-2006 @ 6:52AM
Rob Dannatt said...
Sounds and reads like a well thought through review, and to be fair I didn?t expect anything scintillating to come from this film in the first place. But that isn?t surprising concerning the fact that the film was created by a wrestling federation and an ex-porn director.
Where I differ from Scott is that I myself am a huge wrestling fan, but not to much a huge horror genre fan. Though I have watched and enjoyed quite a good range of horror films over the years. But from what I?ve seen so far of See No Evil I think it will be another film I?ll possibly see when it hits the TV screens in a couple of years time.
What this basically comes down to is another attempt by wrestling mogul Vince McMahon to try and create a cash cow opportunity from a film concept that he feels is socially fashionable and easily marketable. And granted while the television, internet and other advertising campaigns have been impressive, the reviews haven?t.
To put it simply - Vince if you don?t want WWE Films to go the way of the XFL (Vince?s attempt to enter the American football market) then don?t always go for the easy options, i.e. using existing talent in tiresome, not to well thought out films. Even better still quit whilst you have the chance, occasionally lend out talent to film projects done by film companies who know what they are doing, and save yourself a lot of money and bother.
Reply
5-20-2006 @ 7:04AM
Rob said...
Actually, wrestling fans will be glad to watch as "See No Evil" tanks at the box office and in reviews.
WWE head honcho Vince McMahon has spent much of the last 20 years spitting on the business that has made him rich while trying and failing to "diversify" -- he's tried to be a bodybuilding impresario (failed in 2 years), a football league founder (failed in 6 months), and now he's trying to be a movie producer.
While it's a fact that wrestlers are acting, it doesn't mean they belong on a movie screen. Most of them couldn't act their way out of a high-school production... as Glen "Kane" Jacobs has no doubt proven in "See No Evil".
The next WWE Films production is scheduled to star white-boy rapper John Cena. Prepare to cringe again.
Reply
5-20-2006 @ 11:10AM
Rorschach said...
To quote the comicbook guy from the Simpsons "Worst Movie Ever"
Reply
5-20-2006 @ 5:32PM
Jerald said...
As a wrestler fan myself, I am looking forward to watching SEE NO EVIL....I don't care WHAT people say...
KANE ROCKS
Reply
5-22-2006 @ 9:01AM
Matthew said...
Reading These Comments I Have To Say One Thing. OK KANE Can't Act(DUH), But Vince McMahon Has Actually had his and in the Hollywood cokie jar for a long time. If You look at the credits for Predator. Vince Is one of the Producers, Also No Holds Barred, And WWE Films First Movie Was No SEE NO EVIL. I was Actually Walking Tall( AS If That Was Any Better). But I Feel Vince Should Stay on the Small Screen With the Weekly Wrestling Shows.
Reply
5-22-2006 @ 9:13AM
Scott Weinberg said...
McMahon only has his name on Predator because he gave Jesse The Body a few months off to film the flick.
And No Holds Barred, dude? Yikes. ;)
Reply
5-23-2006 @ 1:14PM
SMS said...
My 2 Cents:
Even if I didn't like the movie, which I did, I still would not have felt bad walking out. Why? Because it's a horror movie that is rated R. My new thing is this: I don't watch pg (pc)13 horror movies anymore. If it's rated R, then I don't care what it is or what the plot is, I'll go see it. If the director has guts enough to tell the MPAA that they are putting what they want in the movie and they will not be catering to the "teenyboppers", then that director deserves some credit as far as I'm concerned.
Reply
5-24-2006 @ 4:54PM
Clockwork said...
Great review bro, I've heard a lot of similar opinions on the movie and this is just the nail in the coffin. Maybe I'll pick it up in the $3.99 bargain bin at Wal-Mart in a month, but paying to see this 2nd rate excuse for a horror movie (as it seems to be considered from 90% of the people who have seen it)? No thanks.
Reply
5-24-2006 @ 6:24PM
osama alajandro rodriguz said...
BROTHER, IT ROCKED!!!!! OHHHH GIMME A HELL YEA!!! WHATCHA GONNA DO BROTHER!!!!! FEEL THE POWER OF THE ULTIMATE WARRIOR!!!!ARGHHHHH
Reply
6-02-2006 @ 6:00PM
Chelsea Iritsky said...
I am actually looking forward to this even though i think i'm late to see it in the movies. I believe that this will actually be a good movie. I don't care what other people say. I'm not exactly a fan of wrestling. ok not at all. but i can say that i do like kane as a wrestler. oh and for those that say "resler"...that's just stupid man.
Reply