Mark Beall's Geek Beat: Brett Ratner, A Geeks' Referendum
Filed under: Celebrities and Controversy, Fandom, Scripts, Politics, Contests, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels

If you are a real Marvel Comics fan, I want you to pay particularly close attention to today's column, because I'm going to ask for your help at the end of it. I don't mean you read some comic books and you like the X-Men; I mean you are a True Believer. You know who you are, and I know you are out there. Here's the deal: I'm going to offer up a few thoughts for you regarding the soon-to-be released X-Men 3 film, and when I'm done I'm going to issue a challenge/call for help to you, the reader. The topic? The controversy which has surrounded the new X film since Brett Ratner took over directorial control from the popular Bryan Singer, who departed to make the Film of Steel.
The X-Men film franchise has been one of the most successful comic book story lines to appear on the silver screen, and was in fact largely responsible for the current comic book to movie Renaissance we are living in today. However, It's no secret comic book fans have been very skeptical about the new film -- many of us have been very vocal in voicing our concern for the direction we've seen it heading. Everything from the Juggernaut costume to the disappearance of Nightcrawler to the plot in general has met with snorts of "yep, this one is going to be a disaster."
Am I worried? You bet I am. If nothing else, learning that the very poorly cast Halle Berry will be playing one of the largest roles in the film makes me shudder to the core. The treatment of the Phoenix Saga looks to be ridiculously short-shrifted (it's a tough story line to attempt all in one movie, especially when it has to share the main plot of the movie with another storyline). A large amount of attention seems to be focused on flash and pizazz, which is good -- comic books are chock full of flash and pizazz -- but the threat of a poor story looms large. Naturally, much of the blame for this falls (fairly or not) to Brett Ratner, as he is the most obvious change made between films.
Here's the rub. I've written before about the odd dichotomy that exists within my geeky soul regarding comic book movies. Even when they are obviously terrible ruinations of my precious Marvel books I find myself enjoying them on some level. I mean hey, even if the Fantastic Four film sucked eggs I still got to see the Human Torch out fly a heat sinking missile and DANG was that cool. The existence of the Ultimate universe has proven fans are fully willing to accept alternate versions of traditional stories if they are done well and maintain the "feel" of Marvel comics.
I've also previously written about the possessive feelings we comic book geeks often find ourselves dealing with when it comes to our sub-culture heroes suddenly becoming pop-culture icons. Sometimes, this lends to us becoming more elitist than we already are as a group. Which is pretty elitist, you've got to admit.
Here's my idea, I'm going to throw it out to you and see if it floats. I want to take a quick geek pulse on opening weekend regarding the new X-Men film. To do so, I need the help of Marvel geeks from everywhere. What I'm suggesting is not a "movie review" in any traditional sense of the concept -- there will be legion movie reviews offered for X-Men from people who are much better at it than you and I. Critics will dissect it from every possible film-going angle to determine its worth as a movie offering. What I want to provide is more of a gut-reaction, a true fan-base observation from the people most familiar with the subject itself; but I want to do it in a more organized and even-handed way than your average fanboy message board filled with trolls and spammers. You'll be able to turn to any newspaper in existence for a critical review of the film; I want geeks coming to Cinematical for a true sub-culture reaction. Call it a meta-comic geek opinion, if you will.
The deal is this: if you are willing to help me out with this, you must meet the following two criteria. Do so, and you'll get your thoughts shared with the world via yours truly.
1. You've got to be a real Marvel geek. I really need you to KNOW your stuff. Provide any sort of details you feel will qualify you.
2. You will see the film opening weekend. We've got to be quick about this, after all. We want an instant and honest reaction; not a well-crafted and tailored response after you've had some time for the rest of the world to tell you what you should think.
If you think you qualify, just leave me a comment proving your geek credentials. Make sure you fill out the little box asking for your email when you comment, because that's how I plan on getting in touch with you. I'll select as many qualified applicants as I get, and I'll let you know quickly just what I want from you. Remember, this isn't a movie review, it's just an opinion survey. I want you to be witty, but mostly I want you to be honest and open. I'm really interested in learning how the comics community truly reacts to the flick. Stay tuned ...










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-23-2006 @ 2:14PM
ChrisLao said...
The movie opens Wednesday here in Manila, Phils. It's about six hours away and, guess what, it's 2am here and I CAN'T FREAKIN' SLEEP waiting for it!
Reply
5-23-2006 @ 2:18PM
T. said...
This is a good idea, I'm in. I'm at work, so I can't sit around and think up geek credentials, but go to my site http://johnnytriangles.blogspot.com and check for the comic reviews. I'm a hardcore Marvel zombie.
You should consider recruiting from the blog http://goodcomics.blogspot.com, they have an army of knowledgeable smart Marvel zombies at their disposal too.
Reply
5-23-2006 @ 2:28PM
David said...
I qualify because I am the first to comment and am a huge fan of the X-men world. My two biggest casting complaints without watching the movie yet are Halle Berry as Storm, should have begged Angela Bassett, and Michael Clark Duncan should have played Beast, he has the perfect voice and size. Lastly Juggernaut should have been played by HHH of WWE fame, he was in Blade and wasn't too bad, plus it's not like playing Juggernaut is going to require major acting skills for running through walls.
Reply
5-23-2006 @ 2:35PM
Finished.Law.School said...
Are you kidding?
This has got to be the most blatant con Cinematical has put forth yet to get people to go see a film not worth seeing.
How much did Ratner and the rest of the assholes responsible for this crap film pay Cinematical to con their readers?
And for conversation sake:
The catch with your idea is that you want people to actually pay to see this shit film. Considering how severely they fucked up the story on this one I will definitely not be seeing it.
I love Xmen and the first two were entertaining and were close enough to the source material to be worth watching more than once.
Considering what I know about this one with the death of Cyclops and Prof. X, Magneto losing his powers, Juggernaut and the Beast, as well as Prof. X supposedly being alive at the end of the credits, Ratner and the other asshats responsible were looking for nothing more than shock value in an attempt to appeal to ignorant masses unfamiliar with the source material.
Reply
5-23-2006 @ 2:55PM
T. said...
Lighten up, it's not like the first two are all that loyal to the source material either.
Reply
5-23-2006 @ 4:18PM
Martha Fischer said...
Rest assured, Finished.Law.School, that no matter what you think of our personal tastes, they're quite assuredly just that -- we never accept any favors (or offers of homes abroad, fancy schwag, airfare to junkets, etc.) or payment for our posts, reviews and opinions. I'm afraid we're just telling you what we think.
Reply
5-23-2006 @ 4:21PM
Eric said...
I feel I qualify for this task for the following reasons.
1. I am open to seeing the film and giving it an honest opinion. I am intelligent enough to give it a chance without letting feelings about canon story get in the way. All that mattered about the first two is that it felt like X-Men, same goes for the Spider-Man series.
2. I hated the Ultimate Universes, until I broke down and actually read them, like all true fans.
3. I download scans of rare/back issues of comics I own.
4. I waited all through my childhood for my mutant powers.
5. Singer sucks because he betrayed us for that looser with the lame costume.
6. I know that Wolverine didn’t start out an X-man, he started in the Hulk series.
7. I once had a 3 hour conversation over X-Men costume changes.
8. My four year old daughter can identify more X-Men characters than Sesame Street characters.
I am a life long Marvel / X-men fan and feel that I would be able to give the objective view of the movie that you seek, from a true believer.
Reply
5-23-2006 @ 4:25PM
thegrizzle said...
Well, I'm in. I've been reading comics for 17 years, and have yet to feel completely satisfied by any of the x-films. So far, the comic film genre has been all over the map, with major properties(i.e. spider-man, batman) struggling to include esoteric references to the mythology while still making the film accessible to the "public at large." The movie that's made me the happiest so far has been the first 2 acts of Batman Begins. I hate Chris Nolan, but he managed to maintain a level of respect for the material unseen in the Batman films(i'm not a fan of the Burton or Schuemacher movies), and get into the psychology of the character(something Ang Lee failed at miserably with The Hulk), all while spinning his own interpretaion of the mythos. The problem with so many comic movies is that their directors, who've usually made cult classics, or at least decent films, have their personal styles leeched out of their comic films, possibly at the behest of the studio, which defeats the whole purpose of having a wacky mind like Sam Raimi's interpret the source material in the first place. Sin City is a joke to me for that very reason.
Why did I need to see that in a theater? It wasn't Rodriguez's interpretation of the material, it was the equivalent of those old marvel cartoons in the 60s where Stan Lee narrated over a still panel.
Now, the lowest common denominator of accessible directors has gotten his hands around a franchise that was OK, but needed someone with some vision. I've always seen Ratner as the newest equivalent of John Badham. No personal style whatsoever that makes films the studios can consider safe when planning their fiscal year. When you don't take chances, you can't truly succeed. I want x-3 to not suck, and I'm keeping an open mind, but I'll be on here this weekend one way or the other.
As a follow up to note my geeky credentials: I can explain HYPERTIME!!! Ok, well...maybe I can't, but who can?
Reply
5-23-2006 @ 4:28PM
thegrizzle said...
Also, I can explain the irony of Green Arrow's ward being named Speedy. (cuz he's a junkie and all the kids know Heroin's a downer!)
Reply
5-23-2006 @ 4:50PM
Sal said...
I feel that I qualify. I've been reading and collecting comics for over 20 years. I have been an X-men fan for most of that time, and the classic Byrne/Claremont comics were many of the first I eveer read. I am co-host for Around Comics - The Comic Book Podcast and webmaster for www.aroundcomics.com. I plan on seeing this film on Friday evening.
Reply
5-23-2006 @ 5:35PM
Lex said...
I'm from Mexico and we had the premiere here before Cannes. I'm a fan of the first two films so I gave this the benefit of doubt. Boy, I was wrong. Even when Brett Ratner is an ok director and the original cast is back the movie fails in several aspects.
1.-Characters not fully developed
2.-Way too many storylines
3.-Therefore, weak script
4.-Stupid actress asking for stupid privileges. Yes, I'm talking about Halle Berry. It's really noticeable her influence on the studio, director and story.
5.-Really dumb sense of humor. (Some "jokes" are just not right for the film)
6.-One origin story leads nowhere, since the character has no real relevance in the movie.
Now, if you want specifics, here come the spoilers. You've been warned. Close your eyes now. Seriously. Or scroll really, really fast.
Ready?
*********************SPOILER ALERT*******************
1.-A centinel's head appears briefly at the begining
2.-Cyclops gets murdered by The Phoenix
3.-Despite being the new "nanny", Wolverine gets a rather hostile attitude from Xavier
4.-At her very rescue, Mystique loses her powers protecting Magneto, who turns his back on her.
5.-As I predicted based on the trailer, Xavier dies too. Phoenix turns him into a billión little pieces.
6.-Phoenix "joins forces" with Magneto, but she never really uses her power to help him or The Brotherhood in any way. In fact, from the moment she joins them she fades in the back...
7.-Rogue opts for the cure so she can touch Iceman without turning him into a turnip.
8.-The "war" is fought between 6 X-Men vs a hundred mutants plus Magneto, Phoenix and friends.
9.-Magneto loses his powers, so he turns "human"
10.-Phoenix displays her power to kill everyone
11.-Wolverine kills Phoenix, in a good fx scene
12.-Rogue take the "cure" and finally touches Bobby without killing him
13-Remember that chess scene Ian McKellen talked about about? It is in the film, the last scene in fact. Eric is playing chess alone in the park and, suddenly, one of the pieces moves by itself, meaning that the "cure" is not permanent.
*******************END OF SPOILERS********************
You can open your eyes now.
So, is it worthy of paying your ticket? Only if you are not a huge fan of the Marvel Universe. No, really, is too bad that Bryan Singer left the franchise. Brett Ratner should have stayed at Superman and Singer at X-Men. I think Superman will suck too.
Reply
5-23-2006 @ 5:36PM
The Jeremy said...
Ratner > Mark Steven Johnson ?
Discuss!
Reply
5-23-2006 @ 6:06PM
Dan said...
I'd be interested in the gut reaction. I've been curious as to the Ratner/Singer change and while looking forward to the movie there is that lingering cloud of skepticism toward the adjustments of characters like Kitty Pride, The Morloks (or whatever they'll call them), and definitely Phoenix (How many comic books did the saga fill? And they want to wrap it in 2 hours) But what about at the end of the movie? Where does that leave the Universe? Is apocalypse going to enter the picture? Will that intersect with the introduction of Silver Surfer in Fantastic Four 2?? Any way... I'd be in
Reply
5-23-2006 @ 6:59PM
Cath said...
I'm prepared to step up to bat, though I'm sure my opinion will vary from most others. The closets full of comic book boxes ought to testify to my geekdom and while I have been off most of the X books for the past year (i.e. before Wanda got PMS), I am back reading New X-Men and really enjoyed the run of X-23. However, I must confess a predisposition to shudder at the thought of the franchise kowtowing to Halle Berry.
Reply
5-23-2006 @ 7:47PM
Cangrande said...
Credits: I could say I stuck with X-men comics through Claremont and beyond, until Wolvie's claws were shown to be bone, which all good readers of Weapon X already knew. Am back now, but only for Whedon. And Ultimate line, of course.
Or I could simply say, "Because, gaijin, you are not worthy."
Reply
5-23-2006 @ 8:00PM
Richard von Busack said...
As long as they don't add Tom Selleck and Garfield the Cat, the way John Byrne did to that 1982 or 1983 X-Men Annual (in connection with Kitty Pryde and some kind of pointy-headed green alien shapeshifter I'm sure a more serious geek than me could ID by name.) Reading that parituclar ish was the first time I really felt: god, what am I doing, in my mid-20s, reading this kiddie comic book crapolarama. I still picked up an issue or two after that, but that was it for me and X-Men comics. (I'd even survived the Dazzler story arc--disco superheroes, top that for bad!) Fortunately, The Dark Knight Returns and The Watchmen made sure I didn't end my love affair with superhero comics on that particularly sour note.
Ratner may be lacking in humility, but his version of Red Dragon is every bit as good as the one by the weirdly overpraised Michael Mann. I'm looking forward to it...McKellen saved DaVinci, so surely he can save X3.
Reply
5-24-2006 @ 8:07AM
Richard Marcia said...
My expectations for this film have been lowered so much since reading this column and seeing the spoilers that - well, I'm still going to see the film and write about it.
I have always loved Marvel's super teams, so I thought I'd present my top ten list as proof of my credentials:
1) Avengers
2) Defenders
3) Champions
4) Invaders
5) Squadron Supreme (classic)
6) Xmen
7) Xfactor
8) Xforce
9) Ultimates
10) Squadron Supreme (new)
Reply
5-29-2006 @ 8:50AM
Rob said...
Proof of my geek status - Leech is green. Kitty and Colossus are a couple. Juggernaut is not a mutant.
My thoughts -
I loved it. This X-installment is the cloest to feeling like a comic book on screen. I loved all the winks to geeks like me - Drake bcomes a true Iceman, "oh my stars and garters," the fastball special, the danger room, etc.
I also enjoyed how Ratner made his version of the X-world his own. Characters die. Lives change. (Though, in true comicbook fashion, the door is open for resurrections).
I understand some of the gripes, such as lack of character development and short-shirft of the Phoenix storyline. With regard to the latter, remember that it was Bryan Singer who ended his X-tenure with an over-the-top tease of the Phoenix. Ratner couldn’t ignore the itch, but obviously had no interest in scratching it. It devoured some screen time, but was never the focus of the film.
Sir Ian McKellen is, as he should have been. He could not get enough screen time, as far as I'm concerned. As much as Wolverine got the love, the entire trilogy was about Magneto. He opened the series and, post-credits footage aside, he ended it.
Reply
5-29-2006 @ 7:15PM
Gladys Hammonds said...
I have written X-Men fan fiction. Case Closed. See members.aol.com/supersoul/xmen.html. I liked X-Men 3. It should have been longer to flesh out the character interaction, but overall it was fine.
Reply