Review: X-Men: The Last Stand -- Ryan's Take
Filed under: Action, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Theatrical Reviews, Fandom, New in Theaters, 20th Century Fox, Brett Ratner, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels

Since the events of the last X-Men film, a degree of progress has been made in the stand-off between mutants and humans: the U.S. government now boasts a full-fledged Department of Mutant Affairs, headed by an un-threatening mutant spokesman with Sno-Cone-blue body fur that puffs out of the sleeves of a cheap suit and the sotto voce intonations of Dr. Frasier Crane. In other words, we have the X-Men to thank for a new bloated, do-nothing government bureaucracy. If you've seen the first two X-Men films, you already know that this show of good will on the part of homo sapiens will go unacknowledged by the series' resident malcontent, Magneto (Ian McKellen) who serves as a kind of Malcolm X-Man for discontented mutants, eschewing any cooperation with the majority in favor of muscle-flexing and, if need be, armed resistance. At around the 45-minute mark in each film, you can count on Magneto to suddenly don a curious-looking rugby helmet and begin using his powers of magnetic attraction to lift automobiles and their bewildered occupants off the ground. This is how he signals that the discussions are over. In this latest outing, Magneto is accompanied, as always, by his trophy mutant Mystique, a beguiling shape-shifter with jaundiced eyes who has the power to double any other person, and usually chooses Rebecca Romijn as a go-to body.
Despite what you've heard, the biggest deficit of X-Men: The Last Stand is not the switch-out of the gifted Bryan Singer for studio hump Brett Ratner, although that does sting. Instead, it's the decision to keep the weight of the story on the whiny, Xavier-school mutants at the expense of screentime for Magneto's crew. The good guys in the X-world are not nearly as much fun as the bad guys, and that's a drag. Apart from ol' Ginsu Knuckles himself (Hugh Jackman) -- who improbably serves as the leader in a troop that contains weather-manipulators, mind-melders, and an "if I touch you, you just die" girl -- there are hardly any heroes you'd want to see gain screen time as the series marches on. During the course of this film, I finally settled on one good mutant to like: Kitty Pryde (Ellen Page). There's something fetching about Kitty, above and beyond her tubular 80s-kitch moniker. She has one talent and she sticks to it: Kitty runs through walls. See Kitty run through walls in X-Men 1 and 2. See her run through walls in this film. I'm convinced that Kitty has gotten better at running through walls as the series has progressed. On the other hand, the character of Storm, played by Halle Berry, has always been a shrew and a cry-baby, and now she's gotten worse. Storm is the only major female X-Men character who has never had a romantic plot-line, and there's a reason; no guy wants to have tornadoes dispatched to his house because he forgot to send a birthday card.
Storm's purpose in this film is largely to expound upon the latest wrinkle in mutant-human relations: The invention of a so-called 'cure' that can turn mutants back into humans. Some mutants see the cure as the blessing they've been waiting for. Other mutants think those mutants can shove it. Some mutants are flat-out revolutionaries -- one informs a police interrogator that she will no longer answer to "my slave name," by which she means her human name. The debate degenerates into demonstrations in the streets, with placard-wielding partisans shouting each other down. (I don't recall the slogans painted on the signs, but I bet they were unintentionally funny.)
Meanwhile, as the cure battle rages, the film develops a second main story arc involving the return of a not-dead Jean Grey (Famke Janssen), the pistol-hot telepath who could read and manipulate the thoughts of others, and who was supposedly buried under a million tons of water in Alkali Lake at the conclusion of X-Men 2. Jean is back, and she seems to have picked up some kind of unwanted mental stowaway: A malevolent entity that calls itself Phoenix. Or was this part of her personality all along? In one of the better effects sequences I've seen in a long time, the film takes us back twenty years to Jean being visited and examined as a child by a convincingly 40-something Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellan. (These new special effects, which apparently involve the digital grafting of young, wrinkle-free skin onto an actor's face, should do wonders for Sandra Bullock's career.)
Every X-Men film occasions the arrival of some new characters from the comic's B-list, and the latest crop is ho-hum at best. There's Angel, who has giant bird wings and can fly. Despite a promising pre-teen years introductory sequence that frames his ghastly discovery of wing nubs growing out of his back as a pubescent nightmare moment -- the one genuinely Singer-like scene in the film -- his story goes nowhere. There's also Multiple Man, who I liked. This fellow can Xerox himself into a ready-made army, which makes for a few good laughs, but it seems like his character would have been a better fit for the second film, with its military-mutant-industrial complex plot line. A noticeably stupid new character named Juggernaut stinks up the proceedings tremendously with his lame "power" that involves ramming himself into walls and speaking in barely intelligible English soccer-fan slurry-speech, which I guess is supposed to confuse his enemies. (Also, while we're on the subject of disappointment, a big component of the film's pre-release hype revolved around a supposed dual of fire and ice between the bad character, Pyro, and the good character, Iceman. Did someone forget to pay their bill to the special effects shop? When the big fight sequence finally arrives, it seems to jump immediately to conclusion without an iota of interesting interplay or a single snippet of memorable dialogue or anything approaching good fight choreography.)
Without Bryan Singer around to press forward with his twisted, superhero-as-oppressed-minority vision -- Magneto flashes his cool Holocaust tattoo once in this film, but his heart just isn't in it -- the demerits of the X-Men franchise will continue to loom large. The too-many-characters malaise, the perfunctory romances, and the soap opera-style deaths and re-births that plague the series will weigh it down whether or not there's a world-champion hack like Brett Ratner holding the baton. The word on the street is that this will certainly be the last gathering of the now prohibitively expensive X-troop that originated in 2000's X-Men, which is probably a good thing. Three times with these characters is plenty. Should the producers be already scrounging for spin-off ideas to foist on us in the near future, I suggest the following: Dispense with all of the series' primary good guy characters and produce two projects. First, a stand-alone feature film that follows Mystique on a much-needed vacation to a tropical island, where she meets and doubles as various supermodels before getting into some adventure involving buried treasure; second, a weekly television show starring Kitty Pryde as a young, talented police hostage negotiator who, in addition to her natural policing skills, has the added advantage of being able to peep through walls to get a fix on the movements of the perps inside.
Kim's alternate take on the movie is here.












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-25-2006 @ 10:58AM
I wish I was white said...
I kinda disagree with this: "a so-called 'cure' that can turn mutants back into humans". I know it's a small point, but it takes away from the story and the parallels to oppressed minorities if you view the mutants as people who were born 'normal'. I like to think of the 'cure' as turning them into humans for the first time, not as turning them back.
Reply
5-25-2006 @ 12:43PM
bgdc said...
Wow, i may not like the films but the reviewer doesn't even seem to pay attention to what's happening on screen. BTW, beyond Usual Suspects, Singer's not done a damn noteworthy thing with his career. He's as much of a hack as Ratner. Hell, look at the Superman Bores film he directed..ack.
Reply
5-25-2006 @ 1:27PM
Draugnar said...
I'm with you there. The "back" should never have been put there. The 'cure' turns mutants from Homo Superior into Homo Sapiens. They were never Homo Sapiens to begin with as their genetics were always that of Homo Superior. It just takes time for their specific talents to develop and grow, as we saw in the first movie with Rogue.
It's too bad we'll probably never see Gambit romantically pursuing Rogue but then the history of several of the X-Men have been considerably altered for the movie series. For Instance, Wolverine fought alongside Captain America in WWII when Xavier and Magneto were children. Rogue spent her teen years fighting against the X-Men as part of the third Brotherhood of Evil Mutants and, after permanently absorbing Ms. Marvel's powers, has superhuman strength and the ability to fly. These are just two of the many examples.
Reply
5-25-2006 @ 1:54PM
Steve said...
I'm not sure I would ever refer to a Holocaust tatoo as "COOL."
Liked the review otherwise.
Reply
5-25-2006 @ 2:40PM
Erich said...
Well, surely the 'cure' notion is a tip of the hat to all of the squabblings over homosexuality being inborn, and people who suggest that it can thus be 'cured' with genetic twiddling. Given the inherent 'minority' notion of mutanthood in the flicks (and, really, in the comics all along), it's obvious we'd eventually see mutants arcing through storylines that identify them with every major minority group out there. Personally, I was hoping they'd get to the comic storyline wherein the government develops all those 50 foot tall mutant hunting robots to round up the mutants and shove them into Gitmo-style concentration camps, but I guess that would have eaten the cgi budget.
Reply
5-25-2006 @ 4:26PM
Karina Longworth said...
Wow. I thought you were joking about that CGI facelift/Sandra Bullock business. Then I saw this:
""I'm scared for Hollywood, because A-list movie stars are going to be putting that in their contract. `I want 10 years taken off me.' This technology is unbelievable," said "X-Men: The Last Stand" director Brett Ratner. "It's like painting the lines out of your face. Why do people have to have plastic surgery, anymore? Just be in a movie and look flawless and perfect.""
http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/Movies/05/24/cannes.xmen.ap/index.html?section=cnn_showbiz
Reply
5-25-2006 @ 4:45PM
Thomas Crown said...
What is your problem with Sandra Bullock?
Reply
5-25-2006 @ 5:59PM
Anne Hedley said...
have seen and thoroughtly enjoyed both the previous X Men films and I am dying to see X Men 3 The Last Stand. I should have gone to see it tomorrow but due to an accident and hospital I cannot walk properly - but my friend is going to take me and look after me and I will walk the best I can.
I love Hugh Jackman as Wolverine - he makes the character so beleivable - that's what talent does for you. I will let you know what I think of it when I have seen it - but my hopes are high I have kept up with all the news - I think - there has been so much.
Reply
5-25-2006 @ 7:56PM
Finished.Law.School said...
Anne Hedley, being injured in the hospital is much better than wasting your time on this film.
Reply
5-27-2006 @ 11:24AM
Creighton said...
For anyone who's followed the X-Men prior to the 2000 debut of Singer's first flick:
How distracting is it to watch "The Last Stand" while multiple interactions between characters in this film, who historically have significant relationships, goes completely overlooked?
I mean, Singer himself took some liberties with character developement and storyline, but Ratner has really outdown himself in this third installment.
The most nauseating for me would have to be when Xavier rolled himself right into the Grey's house to confront the Phoenix & he did not so much as acknowledge Juggernaut as he passed by. Did someone forget to tell Patrick Stewart that he was in a scene with his character's brother?
Reply
5-29-2006 @ 12:40PM
bob said...
i can believe some of the retared previous coments. Draugnar's theory on homo superior is rediculous. obviously he doesnt understand that mutants are homo sapiens with gene abnormalities. like which causes albinos. like most traits they can show at different times. its called puberty. that's why the kids are different ages when they discover thier special abilities. What the cure would do is adjust your genetice stream and remove the abnormalities making you so called "normal". what he is probably thinking about is when magneto says they are at a dawn of a new error. what he is refering to is what ever is causing humans to have these genetic abnormalities is becoming increasing prevalent. and more and more humans with so called "special ablities."
Reply
5-29-2006 @ 11:33PM
sam said...
yo this film rocks only a true fan can appriciate it. and only a true fan can see that this film is not great cas the comics are so vast and marvelous, so as far as films go this this is extreme
Reply
6-02-2006 @ 12:15PM
Matty said...
The BIGGEST disapointment of this movie was that the loser writing this story did not include the best x-men character of all time- Gambit. He is by far the best character in the comic and its a travesty that he wasn't a character in the movie.
Reply
6-04-2006 @ 3:02PM
Ella said...
I love the new X-Men film. I think the story line is not predictable, the characters are developed in an extremely effective way and all the actors are well ahead of their game. However the star of the show has got to be the amazing Hugh Jackman as the stubborn Wolverine. His character's difficult relationship with Jean Grey is explored, and to great effect. Overall I think the film is amazing and would throughly enjoy a spin-off which followed Wolverine's progress, after losing Jean for a second time. I give this film 7 Stars.
Reply
6-06-2006 @ 1:35AM
Mike said...
The third film is not as good as the second. It's just not. Too many character flaws, and as others have mentioned the writers of the first two films made an effort to be true to the characters, so you get Cyclops vs Wolverine, a conflicted but faithful Jean Gray, etc, etc. In the third film you get Magneto leaving Mystique because she is 'cured'? and she decides to turn over information on Magento because WHY? Stupid. The best part of the movie, the emotional 'high' of the movie is the Dark Phoenix vs Prof X confrontation (ie: x men 136). They should have had this fight end in a win for Prof X, breakers back in place they attempt to fight Magneto at the Lab where it becomes clear that Jean is losing control of her powers again, then she goes crazy, kills people on the island/lab and Prof X must step in again, only to be killed. Scott/Cyclops must then lead the battle to destroy Jean before she destroys the world (x men 137) having Cyclops killed they way he goes in the movie is just plain lazy and Wolverine killing her at the end ignores the history as is a lame thing to do
Reply
6-07-2006 @ 9:37AM
Vanessa Cruz said...
Wow, First off i am amazed to see such diversity amongst these comments. I have to say that honestly, in my opinion, there was GOOD and BAD in this film. The action was cool. Casting was ok (except i still feel someone younger should have played jean, and maybe angela basset would have given storm that aura. C'mon she was worshipped as a goddess! They gave her such a corny line in part 1, where it almost seemed like a challenge... c'mon storm vs toad???? LOL @ that 1!
Watching the movie and having been such a huge follower of xmen since i was a baby, i can agree tht the fact that the storyline was changed so much was a total disappointment in one aspect and a shock at the same time. It was a lil cool cuz i felt stupid knowing certain characters werent supposed to die especially the way they did. But it kept me on the edge of my seat. Being such a fan, i know that theres going to be a sequel, which hopefully will make things better for the die hard fans complaining about the storyline.
As far as the comment about gambit, he was far from the greatest x-man, lol @ that. Yes Roogue absorbed her flight and super strength from ms marvel and was raised by mystique and that blind oracle (forgot her name)and was EVIL before joining the x-men so they totally screwed that up. And from what i remember she was never involved w/iceman. Same as i dont remember pyro ever working w the x-men (part 1)
Another disappointment would have to be the fact that they never showed the phoenix bird, which was A HUGE key factor in Phoenix's powers and was something i was looking forward to. Storm was supposed to have a mowhawk during the phoenix saga and be goin thru issues w her powers acting up when she meets that girl Yukio. And phoenix was supposed to dive into the sun...not get stabbed my wolverine? But not before dealing with the hellfire club! If they try to bring in madelyn pryor/goblyn queen next movie... its SO gonna be overkill!
I can understand the movie being enjoyable to people who AREN'T DIE HARD FANS like myself, and honestly i will still buy the dvd. But i am disappointed. The only thing i liked was the casting of wolverine and cyclops. Halle berry is ok... but like i said b4 angela basset woulda killed it!
Costume sucked. Storm rode the damn wind! The used that cape to ride the currents, why would they miss that in the movie! Jean never got up in her red costume with the phoenix bird and sxy gold boots!Wolverines claws came from above his fist, not his damn knuckles C'MONNN!!!
And LOL @ Cain Marco being a GODDAMN MUTANT! His powers were mystical and he was prof x's step brother or 1/2 brother. lol @ creighton's comment!!!
So all in all NOW that they screwed up x-men all together and We KNOW there's gonna be a sequel w/ Prof X's mind in someone else's body, CYCLOPS OF COURSE NEVER DIED and the "cure" was only temporary. WTF are they gonna base the movie on now? How are the gonna fix what they screwed up? Pretend it was all a dream lol and start all over again? Or should we just wait until we're old and gray for someone to FINALLY make X-men the way it SHOULD have been made from the get-go?
Reply
7-04-2006 @ 9:26AM
Trom Lios said...
X-Men 3 was a very good movie from what i've seen. Its definitely not like the comics in all aspects but it was entertaining. I am a big gambit fan and was hoping to see him in X-Men 1, since they didn't put him in early, i didn't want them to squish him in (like all the newer characters from part 3). X-Men has had so many big story lines, its definitely not over (not if they plan to pass up money).
Before seeing x-men 3 i thought the whole phoenix thing was going to involve scotts dad (the star jammers), xaviers girlfriend lilandra of the shi'ar, the whole dark phoenix saga (hellfire club). Its definitely different.
The only thing i didn't like is how charles somehow easily died to the phoenix, and jean was treated like she was far greater than charles (charles being the strongest telepath, if not close to it, on earth).
I'm mixed on this one, the movie was good but not fully based on the x-men.. i'd say it was x-men + money making entertainment. I'm hoping that a lot of the x-men characters will have they're own movies (like spider-man, electra, daredevil, etc..).
One last thing, if they start doing character movies, give Rogue a miniseries or set of movies. Her past is fairly long and the whole mystique thing was very popular, also you can tie together Gambit in there as a second main character. Gambit alone is quite entertaining but no one can dispute the rogue/gambit impact.
Reply
7-19-2006 @ 8:17PM
Scott said...
yes X-3 was a tad dissapointing, but thats partly because Singer left post production. he was what made the series great. Bret Ratner is a very good director in my opinion, but Singer was what really made X-men great.
Obviously the third movie isnt going to follow any story line accurately, none of the movies do. the makers of these movies dont worry as much about how true to the comics they are, but instead on what they can change about a story to make it more dramatic or realistic. i do enjoy watching a movie thats storyline is right from the comics, but sometimes the comics are to cheesy or unrealistic to be made into a movie, so they change things up a bit. and i like when they do that to a story because they normally make it better.
as for the juggernaut prof. x relationship, im glad that they didnt put it in the movie, it would have been corny, and out of place. basically it would have been an unneeded element to the story. but i did enjoy the character of the juggernaut, but his use of the word, bitc* was out of place and really uncalled for. other than that i thought that he was great.
the pyro iceman fight was probably one of the most dissapointing seens. it was extremely quick, and almost no dialogue! and what even happens to pyro at the end of the movie, it was like they just forgot about him and juggernaut at the end! and his character in the movie changed dramatically from number two. he became sinister and much more dangerous. i didnt think that that was really the best way to go.
another thing about the last stand that i didnt enjoy was magneto's new helmet. it was too large and goofy looking. his helmet in number two was perfect.
the ending was dramatic and spectacurlarly entertaining with the death of jean at the hands of wolverine. but the begining was flawed and moved to quickly with scott dying in the first 45 minutes, and the loss of mystique as soon as they break her out. and angel was just kind of stuck in the movie for the heck of it. he really didnt contribute to the story at all. and the transition from day to night in just a few moments when magneto moved the bridge was irratating.
but the thing that made the movie suffer the most was the lack of memorable dialogue. every line in that movie was predictable. the writers were lazy and the script was cheap. but the movie as a whole was pretty good, and i wouldnt be unhappy if they were to make another, but i dont think thats going to happen.
Reply