Review: X-Men: Last Stand -- Kim's Take
Filed under: Action, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Theatrical Reviews, 20th Century Fox, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels

When Cinematical editor James Rocchi asked for someone completely uninterested in X-Men to do one of our two reviews on the new X-Men flick, I knew it'd be me. It's not that I don't end up enjoying the occasional comic flick if I happen to catch it; they're just not (with the exception of Spider-Man) the first films I tend to see. There are only so many films a busy girl can see, and my movie viewing-and-reviewing hours tend to be more devoted to indies, foreigns, and docs. The idea, I suppose, is to have someone reviewing the film purely on its artistic merits, untainted by any fangirl bias. I'm telling you all this upfront so you don't have to waste your fingers typing, "You're clearly an idiot who knows nothing about X-Men, so why the hell are you reviewing this film?" comments. You're right, I am almost totally ignorant of the world of X-Men, so take this review with that heaping portion of salt.
Because I am not a comic-geek, I wasn't obsessing over whether Brett Ratner would screw up this franchise or how much better it would have been if Bryan Singer had directed, or whether Kelsey Grammar would be at all convincing as the Beast. I saw X-Men and X-Men 2, and the most memorable thing about both films for me is the good cop-bad cop dynamic between Professor Xavier and Magneto and the philosophical issues underlying the evolution of mutants and how society would treat them.
X-Men: The Last Stand opens with a mutant-friendly President having established a Department of Mutant Relations, which actually made me laugh. How typical is it that the government would slap a layer of bureaucracy over a deeply divisive issue and call it done? Pretty damn likely. Things are cruising along pretty nicely for newly-appointed Mutant Ambassador Hank, aka The Beast (Kelsey Grammer), a furry blue mutant wearing the armor of respectability in the form of an ill-fitting suit, whose days are apparently filled by hanging upside down in his spandy-new paneled office waiting to be summoned to meetings. And the next meeting Hank is summoned to is a doozy -- the revelation that a "cure" for mutancy has been developed and is soon to be made available to the mutant public: Not forced on them, no -- of course the government would never do that. Your government has only your best interests at heart, right?
We also get some story background as we flash back 20 years earlier to Professor Xavier (Patrick Stewart) and Magneto (Ian McKellen), the MLK-Malcolm X duo of dueling mutant philosophies, first meeting a young Jean Grey, a powerfully destructive mutant who ends up under the wing of Professor Xavier. In one of the film's more interesting scenes, we also meet in flashback a freaked-out adolescent boy (Cayden Boyd, who packs a more believable performance into his two minutes of screen time than Oscar-winner Halle Berry manages to put into the entire film) who is desperately trying to cut off the nubs of wings that are sprouting out of his back, when he's discovered by his horrified and heartbroken father. This latter storyline, had it been properly developed, could have been a story unto itself, but we're only treated to a sliver of it here, due to the ever-increasing number of characters and storylines to follow.
A sub-plot surrounds the return of Dr. Jean Grey (Famke Janssen), who kind of died at the end of the last film, but not really. Her transformation to the Phoenix as her dark side gets the better of her, now that Xavier isn't able to control her, by all rights should have been the lynch-pin around which this film revolves. Ratner inexplicably back-burners Phoenix for much of the film, though, giving her little to do except stand next to Magneto looking moody until the final scene. Wolverine (Hugh Jackman), my favorite X-Men character, gets to spend most of the film agonizing over the return of Jean and whether she can be saved, which gives him limited screen time doing what Wolverine does best, which is angrily slashing stuff with his knives.
Therein lies the biggest problem with this film: There are so many characters to follow, so many relationships, that it's impossible to give due time to any of them, so what we end up with is rather like eating a tapas platter at a trendy bar. We get a little taste of this, a little taste of that, without ever getting enough of any one thing to really satisfy. When the film does follow a character for any length of time, it tends to be the more boring or irritating ones like Storm (Halle Berry), who I kept hoping Wolverine would accidentally impale with his cool-ass knife fingers ("Here, Storm, can you hold this? -- Oops!"). Anna Paquin gets about two seconds of screen time as Rogue, who just wants to be able to kiss boyfriend Bobby/Iceman without killing him, before he falls for the charming vulnerability of Kitty Pryde (Ellen Page). I felt sorry for Rogue, actually; the ability to kill people by touch is kind of an anti-power, not one of those superpowers you sit around wishing you had.
The highlights of the movie, natch, are the scenes with Magneto and Xavier. You could put Stewart and McKellen onscreen for 90 minutes doing a dueling read of the Queens phone book, and they'd make it interesting. Big shock -- Magneto is upset about the "cure" and uses it as a rallying cry to build an army of equally angry mutants, telling his followers that the homosapiens will draw first blood. Of course, you can pretty much guess that he's right on that score: Human history, after all, is not exactly fraught with tolerance for those who are "different", and the X-Men storyline (at least in the movies, which is all I'm familiar with) seems to revolve around the dual themes of fear and intolerance, with Professor Xavier preaching peaceful coexistence and Magneto coming down firmly on the side of "get the homosapiens before they get us."
The thing is, Magneto is supposed to be the bad guy of this tale, and yet he and his gang of rag-tag baddies are ever so much more interesting than the good guys. There's also the inexorable fact that Magneto is right. He knows that fear will always override reason, at least at this point in human evolution, and that fearful people will quickly toss morality and tolerance out the window and use all kinds of philosophical gymnastics to justify ever-increasingly encroaching on individual rights (can you say Office of Homeland Security? I knew you could). Can you imagine a "cure" for homosexuality in the hands of a government controlled by the religious right? It's not really difficult to imagine that a non-mutant public might just be fearful enough of a segment of the population that can control weather, hurl things around with psychic powers, or set things on fire with a flick of the hand, to impose a "cure" on those individuals for the omnipresent "good of society."
The big battle itself, with Magneto and his massive army of mutant chess pieces attempting to destroy the source of the cure, resisted by a handful of scared military pawns and a pitifully small contingent of X-Men, harbors most of the special-effects budget, which Ratner primarily expends on Magneto hurling around lots of cars and Pyro setting stuff on fire. Juggernaut, a mutant unstoppable once he gets momentum going, inexplicably talks like Arnold Schwarzenegger back in his Conan days ("Me go through wall now!") as he draws a match against the more elegant Kitty Pryde (who can go through walls without destroying them) in a race to destroy or save the source of the cure.
The bottom line? Well, I saw the film with a geekerific sneak-preview crowd filled with guys heatedly debating the merits of this character and that one, and the pre-show, near-hysterical buzz of excitement had definitely toned down a notch by the time the closing credits rolled. My viewing partner was my nine-year-old daughter, and like me, she was more interested in the philosophical side of the story than the blowing up of stuff. We spent the ride home in a deep discussion about individual rights and freedoms and oppression of minorities, which for me made the two hours time well spent. If you're looking for a relatively intelligent summer popcorn flick, X-Men: The Last Stand isn't a bad bet. I'm guessing that most hardcore X-Men fans will find more to bitch about than like in Ratner's effort with the third X-Men film, but if your only familiarity with the characters is the films, you probably won't know or care all that much about those issues. If you can sit back and just enjoy Stewart and McKellen, and overlook the film's more obvious flaws, it's a tolerably watchable film. If you're a real X-Men fanatic, you know you're going to go see it anyhow, so just go and then go out with your friends after and enjoy tearing the film to shreds over a burger and fries.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-26-2006 @ 9:38AM
Joe said...
"Ryan's Take" was a pretty crappy review, but yours is alot more sensible. "Knife fingers"? Haha. Hi-larious.
Reply
5-26-2006 @ 10:12AM
Scott said...
Aren't the bad guys usually the interesting ones? I mean, who has more charisma: Darth Vader or Luke Skywalker? As for the quality of "X-Men: The Last Stand," Brett Ratner's directorial history leads me to believe that he is incapable of making a decent movie.
Reply
5-26-2006 @ 10:52AM
Richard von Busack said...
I really do want to defend Red Dragon--with a cast and a plot so good that Rattner just got out of its way--but otherwise the geeks are right. Let me give an example of something that the cartoonist Frank Miller used to do with Dr. Doom and Dr. Octopus, respectively--sometimes he'd draw them with little china coffee cups in their hands, which of course made them look a little more tangible and frightening. Under Rattner's tone-deaf direction, there's no real connection between these dozens of superheros. No coffee-cup scenes, so to speak (such as Wolverine getting a beer out of the refrigerator in the first movie, and being spooked by a housecat). In this one, they had 45 years of mutants to trot out, and the trotting out never stopped through the length of the movie. I think it was supposed to be a benefit for the action-figure makers.
Reply
5-26-2006 @ 12:18PM
Bill, the Wildcat said...
Kim, I grew up on X-Men comics, collecting as many as I could between 8th Grade and the end of college. I think for the real fans, your review is a relief. What makes X-Men a great series, both in comics and film, is that it does make you think about these social issues. If there was nothing more to it than cool characters and action, then the comic wouldn't still be around.
I'll admit to concerns about the film tackling the Phoenix saga, but there's little chance of translating that into film. Was just too big a story.
Reply
5-26-2006 @ 1:17PM
Cath said...
I haven't seen the film yet but will do so over the weekend, and I have skipped over the all-too-frequent tendency of reviewers to waste word count on summarizing plots. Spoiling surprises is not just for trailers anymore.
I think anyone walking into the third in a series of anything should not expect to be spoonfed introductions. Comic books must and can do it without intruding too much on the story or pacing but you can't expect a filmmaker these days to waste precious screen time on those disinterested enough to have failed to see previous installments. Audiences are too quickly bored. And while it is a reasonable criticism to point out when someone has bitten off more than they can chew, I generally find it better to have taken that chance than to puff out a thin story line. Comics that have been around as long as X-Men have just too damn many good stories in their arsenal and it is all too tempting to want to tell them. The hardest thing for me in their translation to the screen is the need to dumb the stories down a tad for your average movie goer. That's probably why Watchmen will never get made.
Reply
5-26-2006 @ 1:43PM
sean gleason said...
Saw the movie last night with a large group of X-men fanboys all of whome we're excited to see it. Unfortunately that excitement died about halfway through the movie. There were way too many storylines going at once, and it made for a very cluttered and muttled movie. It moved extremely slow towards a climatic battle which in my mind left a great deal to be desired.
I think had Singer been on board we would have had a much more focused picture (less storylines, less new characters). I was impressed with his work on X-men 2 because he was able to keep the story moving forward without tangling us up in uneccessary storylines.
I thought the Phoenix storyline was handled poorly in its use in conjunction with the "cure" storyline. Jean had no use for Magneto and as recounted here spent most of her time with Magneto just being moody. The Phoenix part of Jean Grey was poorly developed and seemed out of context to me. The Angel storyline was far more compelling but had little development/impact on the movie. The storyline with Rogue seemed unecessary to me (yeah we get how it must be conflicting for mutants to want to be "normal").
All in all I find myself dissapointed in this film and while I hope that it will do well enough to continue the series (with a new director) I doubt there will be enough in this film to bring people back to the theatre to see it again.
Reply
5-26-2006 @ 2:39PM
j.brown said...
Having sat throught the midnight screening of X3 last night, I intended on having exhausted myself and not wanting to comment on anyone's review.
However, I think you've made some great points and backhandedly hit the reasons so many fanboys don't like Brett Ratner. The Rat has simply churned out fanboy pornography with X3. There are so many characters and places and powers that they overwhelm so much of what's going on. The best X-scribes know the central story of identity and social disenfranchisement - but use that big canvas to tell character stories inside of it.
What Singer did in the first two films was to tell a couple relatively compelling character stories surrounded in the context of the otherworldly characters - hinting at an even greater expanse of mutants and superheroes just off the screen's edge. The Rat puts everthing on the screen removing the point-of-view of a true storyteller. For any Rat fans out there, compare "Red Dragon" and "Manhunter" and tell me if you don't see what I mean. It is the power of the unseen.
X3 doesn't suck, as I feared. However, it did make clear to me what a superior filmmaker Bryan Singer is, making me a little anxious now to see the heaping ball of crap that will be 'Superman'.
Reply
5-26-2006 @ 9:36PM
stephen said...
How can anyone say way too many storylines.The many storylines kept entertaining and not the blah,blah
of rehashing of only a couple.Also, the extra characters and plots were able to intrically mold together eventually.
Reply
5-27-2006 @ 6:45AM
larry ferrell said...
Gosh! I'm not an X-men follower but took my three sons to see it because they are. I must admit, I really enjoyed the movie! I guess I'm just lacking in essential "X-men knowledge" to be very critical !
Reply
5-27-2006 @ 2:22PM
Scaramanga said...
"I think anyone walking into the third in a series of anything should not expect to be spoonfed introductions."
...Yes, and that's the problem, which you may not have been exposed to as you haven't seen the film yet - Ratner has put together a film that seems to scream "I never saw the first films until I saw the DVDs that were sent over by my assistant the night before I got the job' - he seems to have lost the thread that Singer had carefully put together - Magneto acts differently, Wolverine acts differently, the whole mechanism is different...
Characters addressing each other by name, a common 'Audience, this character is named 'Rogue' ploy, and other poorly-written vignettes are used over and over again by Ratner, as though he himself is amazed he's at the helm. Magneto makes clichéd speeches that aren't necessary."The Cure" is a ham-fisted plot device that the Singer films might have handled a bit more cleverly, possibly pitching it as only huge corporate Pharmacuticals can: 'Evolva, For a New Beginning™' or something better than a lame sign that reads "LINE FOR THE CURE HERE."
Even the music and title sequence are terrible - where were the amazing droning bass-bellows that accompanied the trailer? Instead, we get goofy blasts and little help from the music score.
Fact is, the other films were sci-fi that had a character base, making them films that could be enjoyed by even non-believers like say, my girlfriend, who will often opt out of silly summer-smashes like the X-Men series. Here, Ratner gives a good effort, but the pacing Singer established is lost, and while it's a shame, it's not a total wash - it's always fun to see mutants fighting, and there are signifigant plot advances.
X3 is just not as good as the other films have been.
Reply
5-27-2006 @ 8:02PM
jacko said...
Ain't seen it yet. May not. Because, yes, I'm an X-fan.
Nonetheless - while not presuming to place the comics on a BLEAK HOUSE scale, these films were drawn upon very lengthy, very detailed source material. They are adaptations, and are therefore obligated to deliver SOME character.
Basically, Berry's Storm was a disaster in 1 and 2, and the clips I've seen of 3 don't help. This is a crucial personage in the X team, and the X team is what the books were always about. And, on that note, you just can't bring on Phoenix and keep her a sub-plot. Instead of once again replaying the Xavier/Magneto conflict, the resuurection of Jean could have offered talented filmmakers wonderful opportunities to inject story and drama, without sacrificing one bit of razzle dazzle. I mean, the woman can rend planets apart, for Christ's sake.
Again, I haven't seen it. But I know something of Brett Ratner. If he's a decent director, I've got wings.
Reply
5-28-2006 @ 11:08PM
sarah said...
Enjoyed your review. Just thought I would inform you that the talented, "freaked-out adolescent boy" you mention, who is desperately trying to cut off the nubs on his back, is actually Ben Foster, not Cayden Boyd. Thank you for giving due credit to this rising star!
Reply
5-29-2006 @ 2:15AM
Kim Voynar said...
Sarah,
Ben Foster played the role of older Angel. In the scene I referred at the beginning, with young Warren Worthington III/Young Angel, the role is played by Cayden Boyd. http://imdb.com/name/nm1064823/
Kim
Reply
6-02-2006 @ 2:01PM
ChrisLao said...
I have been a longtime X-men fan having lived through it's glorious 80's run (with the fabled "Dark Phoenix Saga") up to the present (Joss Whedon'd "Gifted" storyline). I was excited to actually see my beloved characters in live action (as opposed to just being drawn) on the first X-men movie and was blown away with just the 1st ten minutes of X2 at the sight of a bamfing Nightcrawler. X-Men The Last Stand was more or less a completion of this fantasy that became a reality. The conflict amongst mutants and humans, the breathtaking action scenes, the Sentinels, Magneto, Angel and everything this (supposed) trilogy gave us is something a longtime fan has dreamed of. I don't know what the critics and pundits wanted... did they want this movie to change their lives? I was entertained and, speaking as TRUE FAN, I could not ask for more. Thank you for making all three X-Men movies.
Reply
6-02-2006 @ 7:08PM
Anna said...
i saw this movie last night, with the previous knowledge of there is someone who can make weather and ummmmm someone who has knives out of his fingers. oh and theres a bald guy too. i fell asleep during the 2nd movie and havent seen the first but my friend had seen the 2nd and wanted me to go however i wasnt looking 4ward to it. but, suprisingly, i loved it, definetly buying!!
Reply
6-13-2006 @ 5:16PM
Knight6852 said...
I've seen all three X-Men movies and have been reading and collecting all the way back to the original X-Men. It's been eluded to that the story material was too vast for any one movie to encompass. I agree with that sentiment, but I believe the studios have missed a golden opportunity. The way the comic world deals with the exceptionally large storylines is by crossovers (ie. secret wars, age of apocalypse, etc). The handling of the Phoenix storyline was dismal at best. That was one of the best stories ever portrayed in comics and they didn't even explore it. The studio would have done better by introducing the Phoenix as a side story and then defer to a sequel just about her. They've eluded to doing this with Wolverine. Imagine the amount of spin-offs they could make with this premise. And, just like with the comics, people would go see every single movie just to keep up with the storyline. Hell, if they did it right they could spin off into a Dazzler movie starring Paris Hilton and people would actually go see it because they'd be so hooked. Now, that shows the potential of the concept. Anyone who collects comics understands this point.
Reply