DARK CITY 2?? (Don't Toy With Me, Proyas)
Filed under: Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Noir, New Line, Fandom, Remakes and Sequels
Like a whole lot of you, I "discovered" a strange little sci-fi flick called Dark City right after it hit DVD. (I do remember wanting to see the film during its theatrical run, but it opened opposite David Schwimmer's Kissing a Fool and Richard Dreyfuss' Krippendorf's Tribe, and I wasn't about to miss either of those.) (If I have to tell you I was just kidding, you might be drunk right now.)So after hastily unwrapping the brand-new New Line DVD (and noticing that the platter came complete with a Roger Ebert audio commentary!) and grabbing a few snack items, I sat down to enjoy what I'd hoped would be a pretty nifty science-fiction movie. And nifty it was. Also dark, moody, disturbing, intelligent, bizarre, intense, strange, and oddly beautiful. It was a full-bore neo-noir mystery combined with a really convoluted (yet still decipherable) episode of The Twilight Zone. It had brilliant set design, retina-tickling visual tricks, brilliantly bombastic music, some really creepy villains, and a cast of old-school archetypes portrayed by some rather brave actors. (Rufus Sewell and William Hurt are great; Keifer Sutherland is wonderfully unhinged; and then there's the achingly lovely Jennifer Connelly, whom, according to court order, I'm not legally allowed to write about, so let's just move on.)
So the recap is this: Dark City made less than $15 million during its theatrical run, but (like many excellent sci-fi films *koff* Blade Runner) it has since gone on to become a wiiiiidely-adored piece of filmmaking. That's not to say that everyone loves the thing, but those who do -- do so with much fervor. (Good ol' Ebert called it the best movie of 1998, god love him.)
Segue from unnecessarily lengthy intro into the meat of the matter:
In a message board post right here (which was brought to our attention by this kook right here), Dark City / The Crow , I, Robot director Alex Proyas just dropped two little tidbits that had my geek light flashing:
1. As we already know, New Line is working on a big swanky Special Edition of Dark City, which isn't a big shock considering the fanbase its built over the past few years. It is, however, very good news, despite the fact that the original DC DVD is a dandy release all over, what with its lovely anamorphic transfer, a pair of commentaries, a featurette comparing Dark City to Metropolis, thoughts from Neil Gaiman, etc. Bottom Line: This movie is worthy of the "double-dip" treatment.
2. Does Proyas actually intend to make a Dark City ... sequel??? Really?? This comes from the keyboard of Proyas himself (we think): "DC was hardly a smash hit at the box office so it is unlikely, if a sequel was made, they'd give me a huge budget to work with. So don't worry too much about that! I am more and more interested in the idea of a sequel, and who knows, after the special edition comes out, with everyone's support behind it, a sequel... maybe who knows... but I've already said too much."









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-24-2006 @ 11:29AM
bgdc said...
Saw DC at the theaters - one of the few - and loved it. I dig showing it to people who've never been exposed to its quiet noir-ish beauty.
Reply
6-24-2006 @ 11:58AM
Rocky said...
So, I actually went to see DC on the opening weekend in the small indie theater near the University I went to. Right after that, I drove across town with my friend and girlfriend and we saw Kissing A Fool. I wanted to see it because of Jason Lee though not Schwimmer. Despite Schwimmer getting top billing for that film, it really starred Jason Lee. Oh well...
Reply
6-24-2006 @ 1:35PM
jmchez said...
Coming soon, a Special Ed. of Dark City and (finally!) one of Blade Runner? Boy, I'll be in futuristic Dystopian, Metropolis-like heaven!
Reply
6-24-2006 @ 6:47PM
The Girl from OGYGIA said...
Here we have a potential sequel for one of the most derivative (not to mention one of the worst-acted) films ever committed to celluloid. Who says postmodernism is dead?
Reply
6-25-2006 @ 3:31AM
bgdc said...
The Matrix got two sequels and that still qualifies as the least original, worst acted, most poorly directed/ written film of all time. If Matrix with its simplistic plotting can get a cultish following, then why can't Dark City?
Reply
6-25-2006 @ 10:05PM
josh said...
I saw DC in the theater and loved it. Great movie. I don't know if a sequel is really a good idea, (or even needed) but I would check that out for sure. I wish Proyas had continued to make movies as good as Dark City.
I disagree with bgdc, though - the first Matrix is a fun movie, with some good action scenes and lots of clever (though lifted from myriad other sources - including Dark City) little conceits. I don't think it was worthy of all the fever it generated, but for a summer action film (which is what it was marketed as), it was good fun.
Reply
6-26-2006 @ 12:56AM
Alasdair Sinclair said...
You neglected to mention that you absolutely must skip the first minute of the movie the first time you watch it so that the awful voiceover which explains every little plot intracacy is missed. Do that, and you have a much more engaging movie, as you must think to unravel the plot.
Reply
6-26-2006 @ 1:33AM
Scott Weinberg said...
GOOD POINT, Al! Sorry I didn't mention that myself.
Basically, if you're about to watch DC for the very first time, MUTE the flick when you hear Kiefer's breathy voice-over at the beginning. It makes the flick a whole lot better.
Reply
6-27-2006 @ 1:25PM
The Jeremy said...
I wonder what David Goyer really thinks of the Wachowskis considering *The Matrix* is essentially a rip-off of Goyer's *Dark City* but with the actual namesake plot device actually being taken from the late Robert Holmes's epic storyline known as "The Deadly Assassin" from *Doctor Who* in 1976.
Reply