Jeffrey M. Anderson's 400 Screens, 400 Blows - From the Shadowy, Dust-Covered Vaults
Filed under: Classics, 400 Screens, 400 Blows

I'd like to take a moment, if I may, to talk about revivals. It's a dirty word to most critics, and an even greater number of editors. "Why should we bother reviewing an old movie?" they ask. You'd think it would be a prerequisite for the job, but the sad truth is that most critics have very little notion of film history; they're out there flying blind.
For example, a knowledge of early cinema, and especially the heavily-textured work of F.W. Murnau or Max Ophuls, may have helped most mainstream critics appreciate the beautiful work Terrence Malick turned in on The New World, while at the same time realizing that Memoirs of a Geisha and Brokeback Mountain were really only so much postcard posturing.
There are four older movies currently on the charts: Carol Reed's The Fallen Idol (1948) is on 2 screens with a $104,000 gross after 20 weeks. Jean-Pierre Melville's Army of Shadows (1969) is on 6 screens with a gross of $330,000 after 9 weeks. Claude Sautet's Classe tous risques (1960) is hanging on after 30 weeks with $91,000, and G.W. Pabst's Pandora's Box (1928) just opened on 1 screen.
These grosses do not take into consideration the monies earned during the films' original releases. But at the same time, they also do not take into consideration the new expenses racked up by the skilled technicians who spent hours and hours restoring these films to pristine perfection.
One company has done remarkably well in sustaining itself in business while releasing mainly revival films. Rialto Pictures was founded in 1997 and has distributed, among others: Jean-Luc Godard's Contempt (1963), Federico Fellini's Nights of Cabiria (1957), Jean Renoir's Grand Illusion (1937), Carol Reed's The Third Man (1949), Michael Powell's Peeping Tom (1960), Robert Bresson's Au hasard Balthazar (1966) and Gillo Pontecorvo's The Battle of Algiers (1966). They scored their biggest hit in 2004 with Ishiro Honda's original, uncut Godzilla (1954).
Additionally, they spearheaded an all-important restoration of five classics by the great Luis Bunuel: Diary of a Chambermaid (1964), The Milky Way (1969), The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie (1972), The Phantom of Liberty (1974) and That Obscure Object of Desire (1977).
Any critic who bothered to review the Rialto films over the past ten years would have received an automatic, mini film school. But when I attended the press screenings, I was usually accompanied by only one or two other reporters (as opposed to the 50 or 60 who show up for swill like The Da Vinci Code). The irony of the situation is that, when these older movies do get reviewed, the copy usually alludes to the fact that they are unquestionably the best things playing in the multiplexes at that particular moment.
Right now, I can't think of a better current release than Melville's Army of Shadows (except maybe Hou Hsiao-hsien's Three Times). It's an exciting, if grim and unflagging portrait of war and the ultimate fruitlessness of it all. Its more brave and clever than nearly any war movie made since. Similarly, Pandora's Box is one of the most vivid, luminous pictures from the silent era, thanks mostly to the presence of Ms. Louise Brooks. Each time I see the film, I find it difficult to suppress a gasp when she appears on screen. She's still more striking than many of today's stars.
In 2005, I had the pleasure of reviewing Sam Peckinpah's restored Major Dundee (1965), a Harold Lloyd retrospective, and Michelangelo Antonioni's The Passenger (1975). In the years between 1997 and 2004, I saw new prints and director's cuts of everything from Lubitsch's Trouble in Paradise (1932) to Vigo's L'Atalante (1934), Lang's Metropolis (1927) to Hitchcock's Rear Window (1954), and Ozu's Tokyo Story (1953) to Bergman's Fanny and Alexander (1983). The list reaches over a hundred, but I'll spare any more details (or boasting). Nevertheless, just looking it over again makes my heart feel good. I got to see them all on the big screen, and I consider those experiences among the high points of my job.
There's the question, of course, of those who live in smaller towns with no revival houses. The good news is that these re-releases usually call for new DVDs as well, which can be ordered or rented from anywhere.
We live in a culture where new, young and fresh is valued above all else, but there is endless, untapped value in exploring the old. Learning your history, even if it's only the meager 100+ years of film history, can shed all kinds of new light on recent releases and patterns of behavior. Do yourself a favor and support these brave, small companies who risk everything for such minimal rewards.












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-29-2006 @ 1:17PM
Cath said...
Louise Brooks is one of my all-time favorite actresses. I saw Pandora's Box with a live orchestra and it was quite the experience. I'm one of the lucky ones who has numerous locales in which to see classic films. I've even had the honor of meeting a silent film star at a neighborhood film festival.
When you watch the classics, you see not only the history of film but the history of the time in which they were made. And the reason these films are still around despite the rigors of time and chemical disintegration is because they were wonderful in and of themselves and not simply dusty milestones. You not only realize what crap is being produced today, you discover how sophisticated and serious many early films were, often in ways we don't see anymore. Having just watched Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse I can say I finally understand what Valentino's attraction was and how few of our current leading men can compete.
But for every surviving gem there are many more gone forever or missing. Unless we garner broader interest in them we will not have the oomph to keep preservation efforts going.
But for those living in towns without the benefit of revival houses (the best way to see such films), there is always Turner or AMC if they get cable. Still, I can't see why towns can't lobby their local multiplex to spare one screen one day a month to air some of the classics.
Reply
6-29-2006 @ 3:04PM
Winston said...
Thanks for this post, it was interesting to read and helpful. I'm interested in making movies one day, if that's ever possible. In the meantime I'm using Netflix to learn about film history and this post will help just a little bit more.
This summer I'm trying to self-teach myself the art of silent cinema, in order to help my schools film club learn a little more about film history as well, but it's always good to have other films to view. Thanks!
Reply
6-29-2006 @ 11:19PM
Josh Bell said...
I was pleasantly suprised that the Passenger revival made it to Las Vegas, and excited to review it for Las Vegas Weekly. Imagine how happy I was to get to see the new print...on a VHS screener. Thanks, Sony Classics.
Reply
6-30-2006 @ 3:43AM
Kim Voynar said...
Thanks for finding that great picture of Louise Brooks, my fave silent film actress. And I agree -- most actresses today couldn't hold a candle to her beauty or talent.
Reply
6-30-2006 @ 6:24AM
Richard von Busack said...
I saw that screener of The Passenger, too. It ought to have a printed disclaimer on it: "For Purposes of Describing Action Only." I have a feeling we'll be getting Pandora's Box out here shortly. I just saw Three Times yesterday, and it made me feel better about not responding much to Wong Kar-Wai's static and oddly coy movies. Hsien is indeed a master filmmaker. I'm also glad to hear Fallen Idol is hanging on. Viva Rialto.
Reply