Superman Returns: Plot Holes, Puzzles & Inconsistencies
Filed under: Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Warner Brothers, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels
Three quick things before we dive in:1. SPOILERS afoot! Do not read this piece if you want the secrets of Superman Returns to remain hidden until you see the flick. Please.
2. GEEKERY afoot! This mini-rant is chock-full of amazingly nerdly nitpicks and such. I'm well aware of this, so there's no need to point out what a dweeb I am.
3. FAN afoot! While I'd politely disagree with anyone who thinks Superman Returns is an Excellent Film, I did enjoy the flick overall, and I think it's got more assets than missteps. Also keep in mind that I'm writing this as an old-school Superman superfan, so please don't think I'm "gunning" for the movie. I hope the flick makes $400 million and spawns a half-dozen sequels, honest. Just having some fun here.
And with that...
1. The Obvious One: Superman and Clark Kent both return from a five-year absence ... and nobody does the math. I have no problem "buying" that people don't recognize Clark as Superman or vice versa, but we're talking about a room full of very talented reporters -- one of whom won a Pulitzer prize before her 24th birthday.
2. Lex is out of jail ... how? He got out on parole? Because Superman wasn't around to ... testify? Parole on a double-life sentence? After escaping from prison in a hot air balloon? And committing high treason? And attempted genocide? Twice?
3. Superlazy: At the end of Superman 2, which we're told is part of the newly-refurbished Superman movie canon, our hero tells the President of the United States that he'll never bail on us in the future. ("Sorry I've been away for so long," (in this case only a few days), "I won't let it happen again." Yet less than half a movie later, he's taking a half-decade space-vacation.
4. The Kid: Since it's safe to assume that the kid isn't the illegitimate son of Bruce Banner, he's obviously Superkid. Right? So the kid tosses a piano at an evil henchman to save his mom from a rather savage beating -- but he can't even TRY to crack open the freezer door to save mom again? He can't even give it a shot? And we're talking about a kid who knows about life and death; basically a normal little kid. Yet his father, after being on Earth for only about 45 seconds, is able to effortlessly, cognitively, and with the clear intention of rescue, lift a pick-up truck before it smashes his brand-new adopted daddy.
5. Superconception: If the Superhump that went down in Superman 2 is the one that created the new kid, then the kid shouldn't have any powers at all -- since Supes and Lois did the horizontal fortress-dance while our hero was completely without powers. And anyway, since Superman ended up deleting Lane's memory of the Supertryst, she'd have no way of knowing that the kid belongs to Superstud in the first place.
6. Superrebound: Does Lois Lane's boyfriend think the kid is HIS? The movie never bothers to address it. Either he thinks the kid is his (which makes Lois Lane kind of a massive bitch), or he knows the kid has a different daddy. Oh, and also that Lois used to sleep with Superman about five years ago ...
7. Superbitty: How the hell did Ma Kent end up in front of a Metropolis hospital? Doesn't she live in Kansas?
8. Lex's Superstupid Scheme: OK, I like the throwback idea of Lex still being obsessed with real estate. Fine. But you think the guy would learn by this point that bubble-headed, soft-hearted henchwomen are really doing him in. Regarding his actual plan: He aims to sink all of North America with water displacement, and then lease acreage on a massive block of green stalagmites and puddle-strewn crystal caves. (A new residence that serves his Evil Squad real well: They end up crushed after living there for less than half a day.) Real long-term thinking there, Lex. I'm sure the worlds' surviving masses will be thrilled to hand you 10 million bucks for a spot on a green rock that cannot support vegetation and offers nothing in the way of shelter. (Plus, how are the grateful tenants expected to REACH their new caves? And with America dead in the water, literally, what good is a couple billion dollars?) Meh, shoulda stuck with Otisberg.
9. Supertrip: As far as we know, Superman flew off to view the wreckage of his home planet, a journey that took five years (yet it only took three years back in 1978), only to return to Earth encased in another giant Kryptonian Tree Ornament. It's probably the same ship from when he was a kid, but since the movie never tells us that, we're left wondering "If all he found out there was "a graveyard," where'd the freakin' ornament come from?"
10. Superclueless: Superman has precisely one fear: Kryptonite. It's the only thing that can hurt him. Everyone in the known universe is aware of this fact. But that doesn't stop kooky Kal-El from landing on a 15-mile CHUNK of Kryptonite! Lex doesn't even bother with the lead casing this time around! Sorry, but the Superman I know could smell a Kryptonite island from 12 miles away.
11. Superlame payoff: Lex Luthor allows people to die. He lets his minions beat on Lois Lane and almost murder a small child. Lex Luthor aims to kill billions and he stabs Superman in the back with a Krypto-dagger! And yet, as the end credits roll, try asking Superman what happened to Lex Luthor. He won't have an answer because he doesn't know where Lex even IS! Yes, it's bluntly ironic to have Lex end up on a teeny, tiny island -- but this is a villain who's more than earned a bitchslap or two, right?
12: Supercuts: Allegedly, Bryan Singer cut the following things out of Superman Returns: A sequence in which Supe is in outer space, an explanation that Ma Kent sent a bunch of smoke-screen postcards to the Daily Planet in an effort to cover her son's absence, and ... the scene explaining how Ma Kent knew her boy was in the hospital. So with snips like these, you lose 3.5 minutes of running time -- while creating a few really annoying plotholes.
13: The Blackout! It's all Lois Lane seems to care about! What about the blackout?? Well, what about an explanation? Is it written somewhere that villainous Kryptonite abuse will inevitably cause a brief-yet-powerful electrical outage? Other than as a plot device to get the jet sequence spinning, the "blackout" is a red herring. And a goofy one.
14. Supercreep: Every time Superman stalks Lois Lane by staring through walls and elevators, five dozen pedophiles, killers, and rapists get an easy night.
15. Superneedle: What good is a hospital to Superman, really? I get that they were going for pathos and all, but Superman in a hospital is like a eunuch in a whorehouse.
Go ahead, savage me. I can take it. (And if I've made a mistake anywhere above, definitely let me know.) Yet despite it all, this geeky rant is coming from a guy who'd STILL recommend the movie to sci-fi / fantasy / comic book fans. (Action fans? Maybe not.) But I still think it takes a lot more than Williams' score, a new infusion of sensitivity, and some nostalgic opening credits to trump Donner's Superman, even if that movie had one doozy of a dorkscene, and you know the one I mean.









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
6-30-2006 @ 9:36AM
Christopher Campbell said...
I think #2 is spelled out a few times in the film - the appeals court called Superman as a witness and he didn't show. So Lex was let go by the rules of the system.
Reply
6-30-2006 @ 10:43AM
Rob Berardino said...
As far as "The Kid" goes....he DOES muster up the courage to try and get Mom out of the freezer, and step-dad shows up at the same time.
They are taking a unique angle there. He is half-human half-super, so......he is as fragile and vulnerable as any other 5 year old boy.
The Clark/Supes 5 year absence thing REALLY grinds my gears.
Reply
6-30-2006 @ 10:57AM
rdh said...
1. Lois has to be older than 24. Five years have passed SINCE Superman 2. What, you think she was a star reporter at the Daily Planet at 16 -17?
2. But was it provable. Remember Lex also talks about Superman not respecting other aspects of the law, such as Miranda rights, etc. He may have been freed due to lack of legal evidence.
3. I think it was explained quite well with the possible discovery of his home planet.
4. He is half Earthling, he may not have developed all of his powers. I was also wondering if maybe exposure to Krytonite could trigger displays of his posers, opposite of his dad.
5. You don't know if the "super hump" in movie two was the time. It may be that between movie 2 and Supes trip to Krypton they actually got together again, maybe more than once. Even if it was that "Super Hump", his not having posers means nothing about his kid inherting hid DNA, what are you, a Kryptonia DNA expert (LOL).
6. No way Richard could think the kid was his unless Lois slept with Richard within a few weeks (2-4) of getting pregnant from Supes. I don't believe that Lois would sleep with Richard that soon after Superman leaving. And remember, Supes left prior to knowing Lois was pregnant.
7. Ever heard of airplanes. Geez, her son just came back, so she was in Metropolis to see him, this is super-picky.
9. It was a 5 year ROUND-TRIP, the original was one way. Probably manufactured the sapce ship in his fortress using the crystals before leaving.
10. Not 100% Kryptonite, but a mixture with the other minerals found on the ocean floor. And he was pissed and in a hurry. You are putting too much of the comic book in here. Richard, a very successful journalist, didn't know about Kryptonite, so why is "Everyone in the known universe" aware of Kryptonite.
13. Not just a blackout. An EMP,impacting not just stuff on the power grip, but cars, portable electronics, you name it. It really was the big story, could have been a terrorist attach using nuclear weapons. And her instincts were correct.
15. Superman was knocked out, couldn;t revive him. Where would you take him?
Reply
6-30-2006 @ 12:10PM
Rick said...
1. I just assumed that Clark made up some story. People ask him when he returns how his trip was. Of course the Ma Kent cover-story would have helped.
2. You have to assume that Lex couldn't be held due to lack of evidence.
3. The discovery of Krypton's location prompted Supes to leave. This "new" Supes is really more self-involved (read: "realistic") than Reeves' selfless one.
4. The powers came out during a moment of extreme stress...seeing his mom about to be killed. Just like earlier we see Clark's flying begin when he almost smacks into the barn-floor. Also the kid is only 1/2 Kryptonian...so things are going to be different.
5. Yeah this is one of the big questions. You'd have to assume that Supes and Lane were doing it before Supes left but after Superman II. Otherwise Lane wouldn't remember how she got pregnant.
6. Thinking it through, you'd have to say Richard probably didn't think the kid was his, since, as was posted above...Lane would have had to get over Supes pretty quickly for the timing to work out.
7. By plane you'd have to assume...quick flight...couple of hours later...she's in Met.
8. Yeah...Lex didn't really think this one through. Iguess it plays to his obsession with real estate. Or he was really doing it all to call out Supes, knowing he was going to lace it with Kryptonite.
9. Round Trip = 5 years...2.5 to get there...2.5 to get back. He probably grew the ship with the crystals before he left. I'm not sure if this Supes holds his breath is space or not. Probably since he needed a ship.
10. We don't know that Superman DIDN'T know there was Kryptonite there once he landed. He would have gone regardless cause that's what needed to be done.
11. Supes just hasn't gotten around to getting Luthor yet. Better question is: Why didn't Lex push that chick out of the Helicopter when she threw out the crystals? I would have.
12. And maybe cut out the Kid-Kent flashback to make room.
13. The "why" the crystals cause the EMP is never given, but the Blackout drives the plot...both the initial plane and then Lane's discovery of Luthor's plot...which in turn alerts Supes.
14. Once again, it's the new "less selfless" Supes.
15. It's reasonable to think they'd bring him to a hospital...useless but reasonable.
HERE'S MY QUESTION: ...my girlfriend and I disagree...
Is Supes' Kid immune to Kryptonite? When I watch the part with Lex and the Kid, I didn't think he seemed all that upset about the Kryptonite being so close and Lex didn't act like that proved it was Supes' son. The kid always looked sickly so I assumed that it meant the kid could be immune to Krypto...or that his powers and therefore his vulnerability to Krypto hadn't come out yet. What do you think?
Reply
6-30-2006 @ 12:19PM
Matt M said...
1. "nobody does the math". Wrong. Richard and Lois are sitting in the press room after-hours going over what they know about Superman, and after going over his physical details (height and weight), Richard and Lois look at a standing Clark Kent and wonder for a moment. But they dismiss it because Clark's character is supposed to be so far away from Superman (whom everyone thinks is Superman 24/7 and don't suspect that he lives among them) that it would be silly to consider that Clark could be Superman.
2. Lex won on appeal, not parole.
3. Yes, that's definitely a discrepancy, but Superman 1 and 2 are only in vague continuity. Superman Returns is not a true sequel, and this distinction is purposeful. Superman's line to the President could also be taken as "I was around and I could've done something, but I didn't and things got out of hand so I won't make that mistake again.", but really it's dramatic license.
4. The kid is only half-Kryptonian, and he obviously is struggling with some health-problems at the beginning of the movie (allergies, asthma). In many versions of Superman's origin he doesn't develop full super-powers until he's older. (The super-geeky response: baby Kal-El was born on the high-gravity world of Krypton, so he'd naturally, even without yellow sunlight, be quite strong on a planet like Earth.) As for the fact that the kid didn't try to open the freezer, that's how kids are. When they're scared or upset they don't always instantly cooperate. And actually, he does eventually try to open to the door... Hollywood has a long, protracted history of inaccurately protraying children in movies, making them oddly insightful, intelligent, or boisterous, when really a normal kid will stare silently at strangers and cling bashfully to their mothers' sides. I thought the portrayal of the kid was one of the better aspects, especially versus Roger Ebert's wish that he were like one of the Spy Kids. That would've been completely awful.
5. Superman was powerless, but he wasn't human. He was just a Kryptonian without super-powers. The kid would still be half-Kryptonian.
6. Lois Lane's boyfriend thinks the kid is his because they both want to believe it. Lois isn't 100% sure who the father is, but she WANTS to believe that it's Richard's, and she doesn't know for sure until the kid moves the piano.
7. Superman is in the hospital for a while. LA to NYC is only about 5 hours in the air.
8. This was the weakest part of the movie. I like that Luthor assumed, and that we were supposed to assume, that in addition to building these structures, the other crystals had some other great technologies in them, but that wasn't made clear or actually alluded to at all (except for Brando's "these crystals contain all the knowledge in the know 26 galaxies" line).
9. The ship no doubt came from his fortress of solitude, and if it takes about 2.5 years to Krypton, it will still take an additional 2.5 years to travel BACK to Earth.
10. I don't think the island is 100% kryptonite, but there were definitely veins of kryptonite laced all around. The crystals were mostly Earth-rock.
11. The movie has to end at some point.
12. That cut of the movie was well over 3 hours long. Yes, you can cut those in quickly, but the end result would be an uneven pace before Superman's first big rescue. I'd rather see those things cut out for the sake of time than done poorly.
13. The blackouts were caused by the construction of the crystals, and as soon as Lois figures out that Lex Luthor is involved the "why" and "how" fades pretty quickly from her mind.
14. I'm not sure what the nitpick is for this.
15. Well, they got the last splinters of kryptonite out of him. Plus, you can't leave a corpse in the middle of the park. It just ain't done.
Reply
6-30-2006 @ 12:34PM
Elrond Hobbert said...
1-15: SUPERNERD! Folks it's only a movie...
Reply
6-30-2006 @ 12:52PM
nikescream said...
The hospital segment was a joke. After removing the kryptonite why didn't they just put him in some sun light? They even mentioned that he draws his power from the sun earlier in the movie!
And I think the whole superkid storyline could have been deleted and the movie would have been just as good if not better.
Reply
6-30-2006 @ 12:56PM
Beeslo said...
Well I guess in the grain of the "superhump" question, the answer could be found in the fact that Superman Returns is a psuedo sequel to Superman II and plot holes such as this are to follow. My big question is, that if Lois can't remember it after having her memory wiped clean at the end of Supes II, why isn't she shocked that she basically just received the Superman equivilant of daterape?
But the biggest thing that always bothered me was...yeah, so it takes him 5 years to go to Krypton and back. I am assuming that this planet is many lightyears, perhaps hundreds, away. Doesn't the fact that when he returns 5 years later, just 5 years has passed on Earth...shouldn't 500 years passed by? If you go at least the speed of light to get to a place hundreds of lightyears away, hundreds of years will pass by on Earth...dunno. But this is what bothered me a lot. Screw why no one noticed...more like why only 5 years have passed.
Reply
6-30-2006 @ 1:00PM
Jay Allen said...
My big beef with the Clark Kent thing is that it even exists. How many people DIE every day because Superman is writing bylines and gutter copy??
Isn't it high time they killed "Clark"?
As for the five-year parallel, I think one of the ways they addressed this was in the depiction of Superman himself. When he was on the screen, there was a superhuman...I don't know, glow about him. He obviously wasn't just of this world. (Maybe I imagined this, but I don't think I did.) The mere difference in "presence" between Kent and Supes is probably enough to throw most people off.
But, yeah. Kill Clark anyway.
Reply
6-30-2006 @ 1:10PM
Christopher Campbell said...
Hey I'd just like to point out that with Superman, plot holes are always beside the point. From the very beginning of the history of Superman, you have to really wonder why he even needs a Clark Kent identity. And when does Clark find the time to be one of the star reporters? There are so many picky things that you can point out with every bit of Superman as a character, comic and film franchise. It really isnt' necessary to nitpick. Fun, maybe, but not necessary.
Reply
6-30-2006 @ 1:18PM
Scott Weinberg said...
For a flick with this many plotholes and narrative question marks, it's especially fun.
But no, not necessary.
Are reports on Transformers teasers, Elm St. DVDs, and Resident Evil sequels "necessary"? Fun, maybe, but not necessary.
Reply
6-30-2006 @ 1:31PM
Mike Potter said...
Doesn't anyone find it strange that Superman slept with Lois, (and we don't know how many times) she has his kid and later in the movie she tells him its his. But he never reveals his identity to her? Even after all that was revealed to him. For a guy that supposed to live TRUTH, Justice and the American way, He not very truthful in this case. One last problem is with Richard. In several scene he notices Lois and Superman attachment, but he nevers says anything. Maybe all this will be fixed in the next movie.
Reply
6-30-2006 @ 2:09PM
Jeff said...
Dear anyone defending the fact that Superman could be able to stand on a giant mass of kryptonite:
Ok, so the land mass is only part kryptonite and part earth minerals. There is obviously a ton of kryptonite in it due to the fact that Luthor can daze superman with a swift punch to the throat. Now directly after this, after being beaten to a pulp by Luthor's henchman and stabbed in the back with a kryptonite dagger, he is able to lift a large island of kryptonite/earth minerals and hurl it into the sun? No freaking way. The lamest solution to the lamest evil plot ever.
But I liked the movie.
Reply
6-30-2006 @ 2:32PM
Jane said...
My question is this - what year were the original movies supposed to take place, and how did the Daily Planet get flat screen TVs in just 5 years since then?
Reply
6-30-2006 @ 2:33PM
Beeslo said...
"No freaking way. The lamest solution to the lamest evil plot ever.
But I liked the movie."
Right on! Now that one bugged me too. But yeah, horrible plotholes aside, it was a fun movie experience. Weird plotholes are almost what makes Superman movies great. I mean, come on, he turns the Earth backwards in the 1st Superman and this causes time to reverse...really???
The fun part is to suspend your belief while watching the movie and to question it later.
Reply
6-30-2006 @ 2:36PM
Bill Martin said...
Actually, if you want to read some interesting comments about Superman's reproductive capabilities, go here;
http://www.rawbw.com/~svw/superman.html
It's an article by Larry Niven, which some of you have probably already read, but it's fun nonetheless.
Reply
6-30-2006 @ 2:58PM
binta said...
I have another puzzle. why was it so easy for the doctors in the hospital to rip of supermans coustume, when earlier he was head on looking into the spaceship's fire engine the suit didn't burn off. Or whenever he enters the earths atmosphere the suit doesn't burn off.
Reply
6-30-2006 @ 3:14PM
Jong said...
How is Lex Luther's plot lame? He was going to raise a new landmass that once fully grown, will have the technology of an advanced civilization. Superman did the same thing when he built his home with the crystals. The "island" in the movie never had the full time to grow. Like all construction projects, it really can't be judged until it is finished. Other nations were going to buy Lex's land for access to technology not land itself, which is focus of Lex's plan.
Secondy, what was lame was Super kid. Superman isn't capable of having biological children with humans because he isn't human. Lois Lane's DNA has more in common with a household puppy than with an Alien from other space who evolved in a completely different system. Isn't that the reason superman is so lonely?
As to the black out caused by EMP, crystals in the movie contain huge amounts of energy that can power the building of a continent. Usually such large amount of energy causes EMP waves such as a nuclear bomb, black hole, quaesars. I figure EMP wave was a triggering energy to release the stored energy needed to power the process of the crystals.
As to why superman didn't sense Kryptonite island, it is because the island itself was not Krytonite, but made of crystals that can take on the properties of elements around it. Probably not as potent as real thing and its effects more subtle. The real Krytonite is on the bottom of the ocean. Think of it as soy bacon or tofurkey of the Krytonite.
As to why no one ever knows Clark is Superman, it is because Superman doesn't want them to notice. It has been long demonstrated Superman has "jedi" like powers to erase memories and inspire masses of people to do good. These powers are more subtle than his other powers. People are like "oh look at Clark, he has the same size, height, weight and face as superman and thus ergo.. zipzap.. what was I thinking?"
J.
Reply
6-30-2006 @ 3:28PM
khia213 said...
JUST A NOTE: No witnesses are called in an appellate court hearing. The lawyers argue to the court.
A parole hearing wouldn't need Superman to testify. Anyone affected by Luther's crimes could say what a bad person he is and no one sentenced to double life would be paroled in five years.
And Lex and the will? You need witnesses to a signature on a will to avoid fraud. He wouldn't automatically inherit by just being the husband.
And while I'm being picky, what was up with the wigs? Bosworth, Posey, Routh and Spacey all wore the worse wigs ever. No one has hair in Hollywood anymore? Or heard of hair color? And why did Lex need a wig at all? He's robbing a museum at night. He needed to look like the last member of the Doors for that?
Reply
6-30-2006 @ 5:22PM
Bernadette Soubirou said...
I can let a lot of the complaints above in stride. Its a movie, after all, about alien from another planet whose eyeballs can stop bullets. My complaint about Superman Returns is that there was no pay off. Imagine the film Unforgiven without the final confrontation with Hackman. Or, for that matter, any action film with the hero fighting the bad guys!! Well, that was Superman Returns. I can not believe any of the film reviews (mostly overwhelmingly positive) were disturbed by this. The bad guys in SP were crushed by a rock -- big deal! What the hell was that? They beat the crap out of Superman and he didn't even get his revenge. I will say this in closing, I saw it opening night and for the first 90 minutes the audience was yelling & cheering. During the last 45 minutes it was dead quiet and all I could hear were yawns! Yet, this same same film won great notices? What gives?!
Reply