Review: Pirates of the Carribean: Dead Man's Chest -- James' Take
Filed under: Action, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, New Releases, Disney, Theatrical Reviews, New in Theaters, Johnny Depp, Remakes and Sequels

At a certain reduced level, the secret to a sequel is easy: More, and better. The ugly fact, though, is that Hollywood doesn't necessarily know how to make 'better' ... and the uglier fact is that they often make up for the first ugly fact by adding twice as much 'more.' So it is with Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest, a big-budget sequel to the satisfying pseudo-swashbuckling of 2003's The Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl. I loved Curse of the Black Pearl about as much as you can love a film based on a theme park ride, even if the last act of Curse went drearily on with too much ship-to-shore to-ing and fro-ing, as if you were watching a filmed re-enactment of the logic puzzle about the fox, the chicken and the bag of wheat.
But when 2003's Pirates was good, it danced; Johnny Depp played Capt. Jack Sparrow as a cross between Dean Martin and Errol Flynn, and Orlando Bloom and Keira Knightley gave us a nice balance of hot and heroic. This is why it's so sad to watch Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest -- a movie waterlogged and weighed down by plot devices and extraneous characters that's got all the sprightly grace of a man long drowned.
Dead Man's Chest starts with a bang, certainly -- with Bloom's Will Turner and Knightley's Elizabeth Swann both arrested for their complicity in helping Depp's Sparrow escape. But screenwriters Ted Elliott and Terry Rossio take that nice, tight bump of a start and lard it with invention after invention, and succeed in boring the audience absolutely. There are unique keys; drawing of said unique keys; magical compasses; signifying tumors; magic jars of earth; official letters; disembodied hearts... The script for this film groans beneath object after object, quest after quest, complication after complication -- as if Elliott and Rossio had gone shopping for plot devices in the bulk aisle. It's not that Dead Man's Chest peters out in the final act; it's that it peters out in the first five minutes, with writing misfire after writing misfire. When I say 'writing misfire,' I feel obligated to give an example, so here's just one: I actually checked my watch when we had Depp, Bloom and Knightley in the same location: One hour and forty-five minutes into a two-and-a-half-hour film, and the leads are finally sharing a scene.
Curse of the Black Pearl was wrapped in a certain amount of supernatural hugger-mugger, but Dead Man's Chest is, again, swathed in it until it's immobile -- right down to the bad guy, Davy Jones (Bill Nighy), a half-human, half-fish pirate buccaneer, who looks like the corporate logo if H.P. Lovecraft's estate started bottling a cheap rum cooler. Jones' heart itself is locked away in the title chest, and that gives Jones control of the Kraken -- a special-effects Leviathan that can crack a ship apart in its howling maw and grasping tentacles -- that bolsters Jones' crew of semi-human sea-creature pirates.
So, yeah, you get to see a half-human, half-hammerhead shark pirate, or Jones playing a pipe organ, classic-movie-villain-style, with his beard of tentacles rocking the high notes. (And yet, I still thought: Ewwwwww, piano mouth.) But special effects are a bust when they're neither special nor affecting, or aren't explained cleanly and clearly. Are Jones and his mean undead? Live, but accursed? How do they teleport from ship to ship? Can they be cured? Can they be killed?
And this isn't insular, nerdish nitpicking; these are the kind of missing foundation pieces of storytelling that can throw an entire film into the dustbin of forgetability. So while you're supposed to be appreciating Bloom's Will Turner asserting himself and growing into a hero, you're actually wondering: Back it up now -- why can't Davy Jones set foot on dry land but once every 10 years? Bloom's performance is actually adequate: the actor's a little scruffier now (or our memories of pale, perfect Legolas are fading), and it serves him well. Knightley is appealing enough as well, even if she's saddled with the task of setting up the plot of the third film with a moment that makes no sense in light of who her character ostensibly is.
And Depp? Well, Capt. Jack Sparrow is a great example of how Hollywood likes to turn garnishes into main courses. Depp stole the first movie, but only because his hands were full with the burden of carrying it. Capt. Jack is too slight in nature and too broad in execution to be the center of any film, although we certainly get plenty of him. I liked Depp's shtick the first time around -- actually, I thought it was funny and sly -- but now Capt. Jack is like Kramer: He shows up rolling his eyes and we're expected to howl with laughter.
Still, show me two men sword fighting on a rolling waterwheel as it careens through tropical scenery and I'll pop to attention and smile; the stunt sequences in the film are all tops, and director Gore Verbinski still gives every shot an oak-and-velvet sheen. Maybe -- just maybe -- Dead Man's Chest feels limpid and overlong because it's just throat-clearing and set-up for the third installment, Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End. Perhaps that explains why we got such brief glimpses of a confusing multitude of new characters. Perhaps that's why there's an after-credits 'surprise' that feels like a cockroach in a fortune cookie for all the 'fun' it provides. Maybe we're just supposed to pay Disney for the privilege of watching a slow, lazy set-up and wait agape for the big finish. And yet, I doubt it: If At World's End is any thing like Dead Man's Chest, it'll just be a further demonstration of how, tragically, modern moviemaking is turning into an ongoing demonstration of how more and more means less and less.
(For a different perspective on Pirates, check out Scott Weinberg's review here at Cinematical.com. ...)










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
7-07-2006 @ 11:04AM
Lisa said...
the movie... was fabulous
Reply
7-07-2006 @ 11:50AM
Alex said...
I hope this doesn't turn into a series like the Matrix series. That went from good to worse and worse.
Reply
7-07-2006 @ 11:53AM
Joe said...
The movie was absolutly fantastic. I think that it will be judged more criticly because it is a sequel,but bottom line:they did a fabulous job with the first two movies and will continue to do so.To say that,POTC2 was a 'misfire' is an overstatement.
Reply
7-07-2006 @ 12:33PM
TheImp said...
No matter what, it can't be as bad as IJ & the Temple of Doom. Worst sequel ever!
Reply
7-07-2006 @ 12:58PM
hegster90 said...
it kinda just seems like he was going out of his way to find things wrong with it. of course its not gonna be as good as the first one, a sequal rarely is and no one expected it to top "Curse...". I've heard its great from everyone i know so i'll take the majority vote on this one.
Reply
7-07-2006 @ 6:43PM
The Jeremy said...
The Matrix series played out even before the second one started due to the lack of plundering more material from the Doctor Who mythos by the screenwriters. The only thing that saved the sequel for me was the hotness that is Monica Bellucci. Otherwise, the film proved that the emperors wore no clothes...or, if they did, they were clothing for women.
Reply
7-07-2006 @ 10:58PM
peggy said...
Just saw Dead Man's Chest and thought it was horrible. Didnt think it would ever end. Loved the first one, all actors did a great job. But this one, Deep, not having that much talking screen time, seems uninteresting plus unappealing. I agree with the review 100%. And what was up with the cannibal scene? - - total waste of time.
Reply
7-08-2006 @ 11:41AM
A Andar said...
The reviewer is obviously wrong. The examle given about when the 3 characters come together is totaly irrelevent. The main character is Depp. In fact the movie makes a deliberate attempt to restructure relationships and leaves a confused Will(orlando bloom) at the end in regards to his love.
As far as the humor, I stil think of scenes and makes me laugh out loud. Its like the movie Office Space and the stapler.
Obviously the reviewer missed (in the first five minutes) the incredibly funny scene of the crow being shot by Jack, humor in the picture of the key rather than the key itself and hundreds of other scenes I wont spoil.
Lastly, to counter the assertion that questions were left unanswered--Of course! This movie has a third installment. The first Pirates movie left questions unanswered too such as the non-working campas but now we know.
And a complicated story like this makes it a perfect topic of discussion. Not some dud movie that leaves nothing to imagination. Otherwise I would go watch Bollywood movies where you know the end and the entire story before it plays out.
Reply
7-11-2006 @ 10:02AM
mantha stoirmeil said...
Sometimes all you need to do is hang on and take a bath in the experience. This isn't art -- but who is trying to pawn it off as any such thing? I will agree that I get a little weary here and there at Depp's signature eye signalling that is in just about every role he ever did except maybe the Irish gypsy in Chocolat -- but there's other times he delivers a line so perfect I would forgive him anything short of murder one. Besides -- and isn't anybody looking? -- the natural scenery is pure eye candy, the CG is astounding, the actors are in terrific form. Just go SEE it.
Reply
7-11-2006 @ 2:32PM
MaryAn said...
Bottom line. The wallet of the viewer is louder than the voice of the critic, even one whispering at the top of his lungs.
Reply
7-12-2006 @ 8:01AM
Valerie said...
This movie was a BIG disappointment. If you have seen the trailor you have seen it all. It goes on and on for hours with no point. The action sequences were entertaining and the 3 main characters were somewhat appealing but that doesn't make up for 2 1/2 hours with no story. I felt as though the little bit of plot that does exist was just a cheap excuse for some lame CGI scenes. And the only reason it will make so much money is because most people will want to see it for themselves not believing that it really can be a bad as it is. Bottom line: save your money and rent it the night before you go see #3. Hey, I'm willing to risk another bad movie-going experience to find out how it ends and to look at Depp for 2 1/2 hours.
Reply
7-12-2006 @ 11:30AM
Phantom said...
I thought this movie was pretty good, i thought it had more funny scenes than curse of the black pearl, i also thought that they didn't explain enough about Davy Jones and his crew, but you could figure most of the stuff they didn't explain well on your own. The only thing that i can find fault with is the ending. I really didn't expect anything that happened after Norrington took the heart. In my opinion after he did this the movie got worse and worse; Elizabeth and Jack, just no...and then Will saw and he got confused they left without jack...Why...Jack faces the Kraken and maybe loses and the worst part of all Barbosa is back! Overall i think this movie was pretty good-they could have made the ending a little better-but it was still the same interesting, funny, suspensful Pirates of the Carribean that we have know.
Reply
7-12-2006 @ 5:18PM
Patti said...
What a dissapointment!! I totally agree with the reviewer. "Black Pearl" was pure fun, what I go to a movie for these days..."Dead Man's Chest" was hard to get through. I'm also sad I took my kids, not appropriate; who would have known? They really enjoyed releasing the Kraken in this one...come on how many times did they have to do that? We get the point!! We went to see pirates!! Where was the feel of the ocean, the salt spray, Captain Jack Sparrow, the adventures of the 3 main characters working together to get out of sticky situations? The premise of Davy Jones, the key, the chest and the heart were o.k., they could have made so much more of the story. I did like the mysterious woman in the swamp and our old pirate friends along with Captain Barbosa. I am interested to see how the next movie plays out since THEY LEFT US HANGING IN THIS ONE!! Rent the DVD and save your money. Then go see the 3rd movie..with hope in your heart (pun intended).
Reply
7-17-2006 @ 5:32PM
=l said...
Ok.
This movie was the best ever.
The first one was so boring. If you think they have crappy CGI you try making it yourself, its not that easy. You could tell through the trailor this was going to be more dark and scarier. So I don't know what the big deal is.
Reply
7-17-2006 @ 7:10PM
Kevin said...
Simply put: Loud, predictable and dull.
Reply
7-20-2006 @ 12:48PM
Mae said...
I DISAGREE with the Reviewer 100%
I thought Pirates 2 Was FANTASTIC!!!!! Curse of the Black Pearl was a good movie, but, I have to say that Dead Man's Cheast was WAY more entertaining. It is true that there are alot of questions left unanswered, but that's the point isn't it? It makes the movie more mysterious and unpredictable. And as for the reviewers comment on Captain Jack acting like Kramer, well I personally think that Kramer is hilarious. And the fact is that the three main characters of a movie don't have to be in the same scenes the whole movie. I mean, that makes it boring. Johnny Depp, Orlando Bloom, and Keira Knightley look great and the AMAZING action sequences make the second installment of Pirates just that much better!
I will watch this movie again and again and I can't wait for the third movie to come out!!!!!!!!
Reply
7-22-2006 @ 5:19PM
kate said...
I COMPLETELY disagree with this review. I LOVE LOVE LOVE Pirates of the Caribbean, both the first and the second! The actors all did fabulous, Johnny Depp's Captain Jack Sparrow was AMAZING, and I CAN'T WAIT to see the third. The cliff-hanger ending just makes me want to see the third even more, and i wasn't really all that concerned with Davy Jones and his crew. I just thought that they were supposed to be mysterious and didn't dwell on it.
Pirates of the Caribbean was GREAT, FABULOUS, BEST MOVIE EVER, and that's that.
Reply
7-27-2006 @ 3:58PM
Anie Enelya said...
I kind of liked it. It certainly wasn't as good as the first one. For one, the scenes with something going into/coming out of water were too many and too long. Then, it was loud, and long. The funny parts were quite amusing - the scary parts made you jump. It's OK - but the first one was better.
Reply
7-29-2006 @ 1:44AM
Rheani said...
I love when people bash the #1 box office hit of the summer.
Lets see
what speaks louder? $322 mil or opinions, I wonder, savvy.
Reply
8-01-2006 @ 6:26AM
Tiara said...
100% DISAGREE with the review I LOVED the movie!The Curse of the Black Pearl was also great.. I've seen it so many times and still can't get enough.I've waited so long for the second part and I'm not dissapointed.I can't wait to see the next one!!The Pirates of Carribean is definetly my FAVOURITE movie!The BEST EVER..
Reply