More Plot Details for Zombie's Halloween
Filed under: Horror, Fandom, DIY/Filmmaking
Okay, don't crucify me here, because this could be old news. However, it's the first time I'm actually seeing a detailed plot synopsis for Rob Zombie's upcoming take on the popular Halloween franchise. While tooling around on IMDB, I came across the following:
"Since his psychiatrist father's death, David Loomis has been working at Smith's Grove Sanitarium. David inherited all his father's files, except for those of serial killer Michael A. Myers, which are nowhere to be found. But when a horribly mutilated body is found, rumors fly that Michael has returned to Haddonfield. Eager to fulfill his father's obsessive quest, David travels to Haddonfield to wait for Michael. Like father, like son!"
Ah, so now we know how Zombie plans to mix the old with the new. Loomis' son will be the main character and, I imagine, we will flashback to some of the earlier Myers stuff. Perhaps, we will see a younger Loomis when he's first assigned to the case? That would be cool. So, is this new? Old? And what do you think about the direction in which they're heading?










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-05-2006 @ 6:40PM
Nick James said...
Sounds much better than, say, a Uwe Boll movie.
Reply
8-05-2006 @ 6:45PM
greg said...
It's very old news that's not the plot.
Reply
8-05-2006 @ 7:12PM
randy said...
Horrible if true.
Thought this was going to be a relaunch re-imagining. This sounds like the next BAD sequel.
Reply
8-05-2006 @ 8:11PM
Barrett Nicol said...
hahaha this kills me that people still go to imbd you know anyone on earth can submit "news" there. This is all false. It is going to be a remake/ prequel.
if u want halloween news the only relyable source is halloweenmovies.com
Reply
8-06-2006 @ 12:43PM
ihatemovies said...
Actually, the IMDb poster got his info from the Netflix site (http://www.netflix.com/MovieDisplay?movieid=70001992), which incorrectly states that "Tommy Jarvis" is directly. So, take this information with a HUGE grain of salt.
Reply