Review: World Trade Center -- Ryan's Take
Filed under: Drama, New Releases, Paramount, Theatrical Reviews, New in Theaters, Politics
.jpg)
The opening shots of Oliver Stone's new film are deliberately peaceful: A hot shower, an alarm clock gently switched off before it can pierce the silence, a leisurely pre-dawn drive to work. Little moments, charged with a strange electricity because we know they belong to a bygone era. World Trade Center is centered directly on that trembling fault line between the final, boring hours of the pre-9/11 world and a radically different future. Good fodder for a director who thinks in terms of decades, but apart from its focus on a seismic macro-topic, the work is barely recognizable as part of the Stone filmography. For better or worse -- sometimes worse -- this is a picture that abandons the outside world and focuses entirely on two victims, alone in the dark. There's never a mention of the snakes on the planes, only a near-postscript from a solitary Marine, who surveys the smoking wreckage and proclaims that "we're gonna need some good people to avenge this."
That Marine is Stone's only indulgence. Played by Michael Shannon, he's an anti-McVeigh who pops out of a cornfield somewhere with a wide-eyed fix on his mission -- to go and provide relief at the destroyed Trade Center. Arriving at the ruins, he slips past an improvised triage center on Liberty Street and is quickly on top of the rubble, searching for survivors with a flashlight. Below him, trapped in a pit of nightmares, are Sgt. John McLoughlin and Officer Will Jimeno, two cops who rushed into the concourse between one tower on fire and the other ominously concealed in smoke. McLoughlin, played by a gaunt Nicolas Cage, is seen leading his men into the inferno while brushing aside rumors about a "second plane" that may have hit the towers. Only at the moment of no return, with his ears imploding from the sounds of a falling world plunging toward him, does he realize what's afoot, and hurl himself into an elevator shaft just as a black freight train of debris blows by.
Aside from that stunning moment, Stone keeps his trademark visual frenzy pocketed. The director who once rewound the tape, over and over, of Kennedy's head disintegrating into bone and brain doesn't push it this time. There's no head-on look at the improvised missiles with human payload slamming into the towers, only large shadows that drape the sides of buildings as they cruise by. At one point they darken a billboard of Zoolander, reminding us that 9/11 wasn't the only disaster that year. Stone's cameraman, Seamus McGarvey, is less interested in catastrophe than in faces, which are his specialty. He filled the frame with Emma Thompson's head for most of Wit and somehow made Nicole Kidman's proboscis look reasonable in The Hours. With this film, he's in there, tight and intrusive, with Jimeno (Michael Pena), trapped under a large, tombstone-shaped slab and McLoughlin, whose injuries are more worrisome because we can't see them. From the torso down, he's buried in hot debris. McGarvey's camera is like a doctor, encouraging them to stay conscious when they'd prefer not to be.
Into this vision of hell, Stone at one point introduces a gun, of all things. One of the officers, pinned and out of his senses, unholsters his sidearm in an attempt at suicide. Because of the heat or other damage, the gun begins to fire itself automatically, sending rounds careering around the debris. Large, fiery projectiles originating from who knows where also streak by. Eventually, Jimeno begins to drift off into a world of languid hallucinations, where Stone is more equipped to deal with him. He gives Jimeno a fiery apparition of a long-haired and blinged-out Jesus to talk to. This happens closer to the end of the ordeal, around the same time McLoughlin is being pulled from the rubble and hoisted up for a body-surf, complete with hand-slapping, through a throng of officers. And then we get the trifecta: Stone mainstay Frank Whaley, as a soot-covered paramedic, surveying the whole scene with his crooked smile. These images, in close proximity to one another, make the film seem, oddly, like a sequel to The Doors.
Stone cuts away from Ground Zero only for unnecessary moments with the cops' wives and children. Maggie Gyllenhaal is Allison, Jimeno's very pregnant wife, stationed in the suburbs of North Jersey. McLoughlin, about two decades further down the road of his career, has a wife played by Maria Bello, who becomes too traumatized to travel to the site, so she watches the events on television. These scenes are the least compelling for the same reason you rarely see movies set in hospital waiting rooms -- the drama is all internal. Real drama rarely has use for people sitting quietly and crying. At one point, Allison's frustration drives her from a car in the middle of traffic, but even this feels showy and staged for our benefit. There's also a minor element of distraction owing to the fact that it's Gyllenhaal playing the anxious wife in the first place. It creates a weird feeling under the skin to think that Stone and Gyllenhaal are working on a project that isn't exactly forwarding the points of view they've chosen to put into the public arena.
Not that a charge of false advertising holds water. Stone has every right to spit out the politics of 9/11 and focus on two men. That said, if there's one moment in the film when his artistic integrity could be questioned, it's a brief montage of world citizenry glued to television sets and displaying looks of concern. Stone knows full well -- he pointed it out during the famous Alice Tully Hall panel in October 2001 -- that a large swath of humanity, from Greece to Gaza, erupted into a spontaneous dance party upon hearing the news of the hit on America. Why does he give the opposite line here? The screenplay for World Trade Center was obviously a maudlin affair, saved by Stone's natural directing talents, so there's a question as to why he wanted to save it. At that same Alice Tully Hall panel, when the ruins of 9/11 were still drawing tourists, Stone demanded that "a bullet of a film" be made about terrorism. That's the film I wanted from him.
For another take on World Trade Center, check out Karina Longworth's Netscape at the Movies video review of the film.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-08-2006 @ 11:30AM
akaison said...
my friend who saw the film said the movie put him to sleep as it was mostly two talking heads
Reply
8-08-2006 @ 12:43PM
bgdc said...
Why would anyone want to see this? Like the last few films about 9/11, I'm missing the draw. Shrug.
Reply
8-08-2006 @ 12:58PM
Alana said...
In my case, not seeing this movie isn't a matter of "not wanting to see it."
I've seen it already. I remember 9/11 well enough to never have to see it on television. The one documentary I saw on 9/11 was on HBO by two brothers who happened to be near the WTC with video cameras. That was the last time I sat down and watching something on 9/11 and I cried the whole time.
As I said, I've seen it already. I don't need a movie to tell me what happened.
Reply
8-08-2006 @ 5:02PM
Alfia said...
As the daughter of a 9/11 victim,I cannot imagine the attraction to this film. I find it difficult to watch any movie which focuses on an actual tragedy any longer. The people destroyed have families who continue to suffer and having to see the commercial for the film incessantly throughout the primetime lineups is excruciating. I shudder each time I see the shadow which represents the plane. I also will not be satisfied until there is a movie that tells the story of each victim is produced, not just the "Heroes". My Father will never return to tell of his experience, therefore I am completely uninterested.
Reply
8-10-2006 @ 2:53AM
kathi woodard said...
i just saw this movie an hour ago. i really liked it for many different reasons. no, not oscar material but worthy of seeing.
"two talking heads"---------totally immature and insensitive. this person didn't "get it" and should stick to comedies.
the premise was to show a closer view of 2 people out of thousands who were injured and died. just a taste of the horrible hours they faced. these men had several surgeries-------one was put into a coma to face 26 surgeries.
in reference to daughter who lost her father and the fact that he "will never return to tell of his experience" i do grieve for you and understand your position completely. i just don't want people to forget as they have already. i want people to know this did happen, can happen again and probably will. to stop taking everything for granted like we all did before this. be proud of who we are, continue to grieve for those who were lost, and, yes, be angry that it happened and it isn't resolved yet.
also be thankful for all those who put their lives on the line for others.
this was the most horrific thing that's happened to the united states and we need to be reminded.
Reply
8-11-2006 @ 12:21AM
Joshua said...
I agree with Alana, I saw that documentary, and that's all I will ever want to watch, why re-create something that already exisits? I understand, we didn't see "the two heads", and I would never down play thier or anyone elses importance from that day, no I wasn't there, I didn't lose anyone, I watched it on TV like the rest of the world, in absolute horror, and confusion as to what the hell was going on, I see absolutly no point in spending 10$ of my money to "re-live" a hollywood version of one of the worst things I've ever seen. Save your money or go rent the documentary, Nick Cage doesn't get killed in WTC.In the documentary, real fighters, police officers, etc. get killed, depressing? Yeah. Glorified? No. Either accept it or not, but don't embrace a Disney version that's filled with cliches. It's not doing the actual men and women justice, just Oliver Stones pockets.
Reply
8-11-2006 @ 1:02PM
Autumn said...
I too saw the documentary and the movie WORLD TRADE CENTER. I thought it was an okay film. I dont know how you could ever recreate exactly what happened 20 feel below the crumbled towers but i think they did an okay job. I also dont think this film was made to remind us of 9-11. How the hell could we ever forget it? I think it was made to show that life does go on. That we have to have hope and faith in this terrible world we live in now. 2734 people died that day to me thats 2734 heroes. Just because two men were chosen out of 20 who were pulled out of the rubble doesnt make them more heroic than the rest. My heart goes out to those of you who have lost a love one due to the terrorist attacks on 9-11. I only hope you can find peace and comfort.. God BLess you and yours. If you dont have hope what have you got???
Reply
8-11-2006 @ 7:30PM
ConnieM said...
Kathi W.,
How could you even begin to think you can critisize Alfia? You have absolutely no clue what she and other victims' families went through.
Reply
9-02-2006 @ 1:41PM
kathi woodard said...
i just posted a comment on wednesday after seeing the movie and thursday morning the horrible news was heard about the new attacks that were planned.
this was my point about the movie---------not to forget they still hate us, they're still out there and they're still working on killing all of us.
about autumns comments-----no it doesn't make these two men any more heroic then the rest but it tells the story of two port authority policemen and their private horror. these two men were willing to talk, were on the set everyday, gave as much exact info and script as they could remember. they're disabled for life. the nic cage character was put in a self induced coma and had 26 surgeries. no one is trying to make them anymore heroic than the secretary, the wall street finance men and women, the girl who worked in the mall underneath----------they all were heros.
this story tells of the shock and horror all the "authorities" had to deal with as no game plan for this was ever thought of and they were running on pure adrenalin trying to help anyone they could.
joshua---it's not a disney version. i've worked at the studios and i know movies. oliver stone (for once) did not sensationalize, did not do horrific clips that he could have shown and that we've all seen. he concentrated on two men, their story, their privete lives, their wives pain----------just a "taste" of what went on that day---------
their are millions of heroic stories that have been heard and have not been heard because these people don't want to speak about the pain and horror they went through. my husband is a policeman and a marine and he was very proud of the movie because most all these people suffer from PTSD and can't come forward or won't.
this movie is serious, down to earth and takes you "inside".
if you don't want to relive it---don't go see it. we all know "the story" but this is "inside" and only a small version.
oliver stone did a great job----------we should all be reminded of what it took and what it will take again.
we should be happy we're americans and stick together always and "never forget".
kathi woodard
Reply