Review: Snakes on a Plane -- James' Take
Filed under: Action, Thrillers, Mystery & Suspense, New Line, Theatrical Reviews

"Movies are so rarely great art that if we cannot appreciate great trash we have very little reason to be interested in them." - Pauline Kael
You've heard the buzz. You've followed the rumors. You may even have bought the hat or the t-shirt, or photoshopped your own CNN title crawl involving the words snakes, plane and a couple obscene gerunds. Now, after months of waiting, Snakes on a Plane -- possessed of the simplest, the-title-is-the-pitch plot in years -- has opened without screening for critics, which is why I found myself at a semi-full Midnight show along with a crowd who, in many cases, brought their own rubber or stuffed snakes. Between TV appearances, interviews, recording material for "custom-made" promotional phone messages and photos draped in legless reptiles, star Samuel L. Jackson's been working overtime to plug, push and pitch Snakes on a Plane -- and looks like he's having a great time.
Of course, if you're going to bet your career on a roll of the dice, you'd probably want to look enthused as you toss them down. Jackson may be a movie star -- he's internationally known and, with his rippling vocal cadences, loved and mocked by pop-culture fans worldwide -- but he's yet to top-line a movie that opens to more than $35 million dollars. (Much like Jeff Goldblum, the total box office of films Jackson's been in is formidable -- but those are films where he's most definitely not the main attraction.) So, why not make a crazy-ass bet on some snakes?
Jackson plays FBI agent Neville Flynn, who is escorting Sean Jones (Nathan Phillips), a witness to a brutal gangland slaying in Hawaii, to L.A. to testify. It would be a serious setback for gangster Eddie Kim (Byron Lawson) if Jones were to testify; Jones can't be allowed to make it to L.A. alive. And so, in one of the most ornate and inefficient assassination plots the silver screen has shown us since the heyday of Wile E. Coyote, Kim arranges for an assassin to load the plane with a time-release box of ... poisonous snakes. Kim snaps at an underling who questions the plan: "Don't you think I've exhausted every other option?" Well, let me think: Guns ... knives ... garrotes ... No, Eddie, I don't think you have. When Hank (Bobby Cannavale), Flynn's ex-partner on the ground in L.A., is told of the situation, he asks the question we all would: "What kind of insane plan is that?"
So we meet all the passengers, who apparently are flying Hawaii-to-L.A. as part of their connecting itinerary back to cliché-town: The stewardess on her last flight (Julianna Margulies), the hearty good-ol'-boy pilot (David Koechner), the rap superstar (Flex) and his bodyguards, the two kids flying alone. Director David R. Ellis tries to keep things moving -- with a plot this thin, if you don't skate over it fast, you'll fall right through it -- and the script (credited to John Heffernan and Sebastian Guiterrez) is as hole-ridden and threadbare as a well-loved sweater.
But we aren't here for Chekhov; we're on board for snakes. And once the snakes are unleashed, you get a sense of just how Snakes on a Plane is going to go wrong: These people don't even know how to craft the rhythms and pleasures of good trash. There's plenty of shock in Snakes on a Plane -- think of a body part, even those naughty bits in the swimsuit area, and rest assured that the film shows us someone getting fanged there -- but there's almost no suspense. Worse, after an initial snake-gasm of an attack -- all hissing and shrieking and dying, oh my -- the film slows down significantly, resulting in a third act that's more an exercise in tedium than it is in tension.
Jackson gets to play the cool action hero with a low boiling point yet again, speaking his dialogue in tones so polished you can hear the italics: "I've had it with these muthaf*cking snakes on this muthaf*cking plane!" That line -- and much of the film's ultra-violence -- were added to the movie as part of re-shoots, after the voice of the people seemed to suggest to New Line that if you're going to make a movie about snakes on a sealed vehicle, you might as well tighten up your undergarments and go for the R-rating.
But, even knowing as little as I do about dairy production, I do know you can't make cheese overnight. (Yogurt, sure; try it!) So-bad-they're-good movies are not born, they're made -- a slow process of time turning trash into treasure, thin trails of camp growing through the idiot mass of a bad movie like a blue-vein mold that adds flavor to a nice Stilton. Showgirls; Beyond the Valley of the Dolls; Plan 9 from Outer Space. None of these are good movies, but they've endured in part because the people making them thought they were making good movies, and that hint of high-minded delusion makes all the difference. The people behind Snakes on a Plane were trying to make a bad movie, and in that they've succeeded.
There are a half-dozen things that could have made Snakes on a Plane a better film: A tighter third act, casting an actor opposite Jackson to play the witness with even a hint of charisma, an ending that satisfies our dimwit thirst for movie justice, giving the designated sacrificial lamb characters even a line of dialogue before they get fanged to death. Yet it feels like after the pitch meeting casting Jackson and crafting the promo plan, everyone let out a big sigh of relief at how this baby was going to sell itself and quit working. Snakes on a Plane has an irresistible title and an impressive promotional campaign -- but pitches aren't plots, and marketing isn't moviemaking.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
8-18-2006 @ 3:18PM
Sam said...
Forget about the movie review: how do you make a good yogurt at home? I must know, James.
Reply
8-18-2006 @ 3:49PM
Lizzie said...
The only reaosn I'm goig to see this film is that it looks so bad it's funny. If it doesn't work out with being an action movie, it could still be an action comedy.
And about making homemade yogurt, I think you just milk and some chopped up fruit in the refrigerator overnight.
Reply
8-18-2006 @ 4:22PM
unimental said...
Yogurt at home link...
http://www.ianrpubs.unl.edu/epublic/pages/publicationD.jsp?publicationId=525
Apparently you can start with a little plain yogurt and end up with gallons of the stuff. It's like rabbits you can eat, but not chocolate rabbits.
Oh yes, and the movie was fun. And it sucked just I hard as I wanted it to. Totally worth the price of admission.
As for the actor who played Jackson's "special cargo", the look on his face for a majority of his onscreen time said "I'd better look confused/scared or I might start laughing." Awesome.
Reply
8-18-2006 @ 4:24PM
Lloyd said...
Well Mr. overpaid movie critic I've been in the movie business myself for about 5 years(cough, concessionist, cough)and I've written my own reviews. I saw this movie it was great. I especially loved the scene where Samuel L. Jackson shot the kid who was wearing a cavalier vest 2 times to kill the snake. If had shot him just 2 more times he would surely die as they're only good for 3 shots. The Boa constrictor was a nice touch. You can tell it mustve weighed a ton by the way it cracked the overhead lighting.
Reply
8-18-2006 @ 4:26PM
Becky said...
I thought we were through listening to Samuel's tirade speaches when that great big shark came up and swallowed him whole in the middle of one.
Reply
8-18-2006 @ 4:28PM
david davidson said...
I'm certain the movie blows..So on to more important things, the yogurt. I think after you put the milk and pieces of fruit together, you must mash it up a little..Leave in the fridge overnight, and BINGO, yogert in the morning. Yep, that's it.
Reply
8-18-2006 @ 5:06PM
BILL MOORE said...
I JUST SAW THE MOVIE AND TOOK IT FOR WHAT IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE, 90 MINUTES OF FORGET EVERYTHING ELSE.
I LIKE SAMUEL L. JACKSON'S FILMS. HE PLAYS A HERO MOST OF THE TIME AND VERY BELIEVABLE. EVEN THOUGH ITS ONLY A MOVIE, WE NEED CONFIDENT HEROES RIGHT ABOUT NOW!
BY THE WAY, I ENJOYED THE MOVIE, IT WAS FUN....
-BILL
Reply
8-18-2006 @ 5:20PM
Bryan said...
James, I was interested in your review until I read that you thought the movie had no suspense. Ummm....call me crazy here, but I don't think it was ever the intention of the director to put suspense in the movie. His intentions was to put some muthafuckin' snakes, on a muthafuckin' plane! That simple. I think you went in with too high of expectations sir, even for "trash" as you call it.
Reply
8-18-2006 @ 5:22PM
Chris said...
I don't know wat u people are talking about I thought this movie was awsome but thats my opinion yes parts could have been improved but it was still an awsome movie
Reply
8-18-2006 @ 5:34PM
ihatemovies said...
"Well Mr. overpaid movie critic..."
Movie critics are many things, but "overpaid" is not one of them.
Reply
8-18-2006 @ 6:18PM
samm said...
I really didn't gain anything from this review....
Reply
8-18-2006 @ 7:32PM
Richard von Busack said...
Eh, you called it. Wishing is not going to make this movie better. Another great idea that no one seemed to be able to finesse. Who's first on the gay subtext beat on this one? Could Julianna M. have been less interested in men? Was that not a beautiful-friendship ending? Thank God for the krait in the barf bag anyway. Do not pay more than one dollar to see this one.
Reply
8-19-2006 @ 12:22AM
Nick said...
"Pitches aren't plots, and marketing isn't moviemaking."
Well motherf*cking put.
Reply
8-19-2006 @ 2:11AM
Etnad85 said...
"I really didn't gain anything from this review...."
I agree with that statement and I thought it was a good (not great) movie. It was definitely worth hype to some extent.
Reply
8-19-2006 @ 3:08AM
Cyberphin said...
So when does the audience participation start? I want this film to be so bad in a bad way that we the audience add the final touch that we yell at the screen. NO not another RHPS, but just fun with a silly movie that should have never been made.
Reply
8-19-2006 @ 8:51AM
RisingSunofNihon said...
I could never understand the appeal of this movie or how it generated and sustained so much buzz over the last couple months. Thanks for the review; you've pretty much ensured that I'll be waiting for this one on DVD.
Reply
8-19-2006 @ 2:31PM
Jonathan said...
long story short, yes this movie looks like crap. they must have begged and went on all fours to get someone famous 2 do it. and Jackson gave in, anyway theres no way im seeing this to spend 9 10 dollars on this movie you have to be crazy. id rather wait for it to come out on dvd but then again this movie for me isnt going to see a dime.
Reply
8-19-2006 @ 7:02PM
chimpster said...
Saw it last night. I expected a few laughs but was pleasantly surprised at how well made the film was. One of the best films I've seen this year.
Reply
8-20-2006 @ 3:08AM
Jason G said...
Crictics are crictics world wide. I thought the movie really put me on the snaked infested plane myself. I really enjoy the "Survival" stories. They make people think. Jason G
Reply
8-20-2006 @ 3:11AM
Jason G said...
Crictics Are crictics world wide. Someone's gonna hate it. I myself enjoyed the movie from beginning to end. It made me feel like I could be one of those people on that snake infested plane.
Reply