Review: When the Levees Broke
Filed under: Documentary, New Releases, Politics
.jpg)
"President Bush can kiss my ass, the United States government can kiss my ass, and St. Bernard Parish can kiss my ass." Random comment from a stranded resident of New Orleans in When the Levees Broke, the latest joint from Spike Lee. Clocking in at four hours and twenty minutes, this is a massive testimonial of first-hand pain, exhaustion and raw, bloody anger that mostly aims for the heart, instead of the head. Even the editing of this film is angry, occasionally cutting rapid-fire through nearly identical testimonials -- 'I heard a boom - there was a loud boom - there was this boom - then bang, this loud noise' -- as if to head-off anyone who might quibble with the survivors' memories. Survivor is the operative word here -- it's a Holocaust-style remembrance, with interviewees often too choked up to finish a sentence but determined to get it all out. In between the personal stories, Lee also reboots those images burned into our collective media brain. We see Spicoli paddling his dinghy and looters surfing away on flat screens. We relive the record needle-scratching moment when Kanye West opines that "George Bush doesn't care about black people," while Mike Myers stares blankly ahead.
The film is divided into four "acts," each about one hour, and the first three acts are almost entirely devoted to the detailed recollections of the victims, chosen for their proximity to the event, not because they possess any special oratory or analytical skills. Some of these talking heads give memorable testimony, some do not. One survivor gives out her phone number on screen -- 504.919.8699 -- and challenges Barbara Bush to call her and defend those asinine statements she made in the Astrodome. Another cuts through some nonsensical reconstruction estimates: "They're gonna repair in eight months what they couldn't build in forty years?" Lee does some of these people no favor by allowing them to expound on the fatuous belief that the levees were dynamited by the U.S. government to exterminate the black population of New Orleans. This canard is repeated ad nauseum throughout the film's first half, to its great detriment. We're also forced to endure the drooling crackpot Harry Belafonte, pushed in front of the camera to billow hot air about the greatness of Hugo Chavez, for some reason.
As a whole, the commentaries form a substantial document, but it's something to be viewed once, not savored as great filmmaking. As we slog through the second hour of them, it starts to feel like work. Lee doesn't have the sixth sense of a documentarian like Ken Burns, who tweaks and polishes the output of his talking heads until they seem like thespians singing in plainsong. He does have a sense of humor, though. For comic relief, he sneaks in interviews with an old rich white couple who were away on a trip to Italy when the hurricane hit. Lee himself is invisible throughout, although he's heard a few times asking questions from behind the camera. Unsatisfied with the response of an engineering professor to a question on whether or not the levees are safer now than they were a year ago, he blurts out: "Is it safe. Is it safe. Remember Laurence Olivier in Marathon Man? Is it safe." This is good stuff, but around the halfway point the film starts to drag terribly, giving us a long history of Mardi Gras and other non sequiturs, thrown in presumably to maintain the one hour-per act structure.
That engineering professor is one of a handful of Expert Talking Heads, but instead of being sprinkled liberally among the survivor commentaries, he and the other experts -- on New Orleans politics, engineering, weather patterns -- are mostly corralled into the final hour of the film. Consequently, this fourth act is where the beef is. Like a procrastinating student who finally realizes at 3:00am that the essay due tomorrow won't write itself, Lee eventually buckles down and gets to work, giving us some documentary material worth our wait. It's also around this time that someone summarizes the entire event like a laser, with one well-chosen, Hemingway-like deconstruction: "The lake backed up a Category 1 hurricane into our levees, and they failed." That statement not only reminds us that Hurricane Katrina largely missed New Orleans, it also indicts the Army Corp of Engineers and the New Orleans city government and calls into question the basic premise of how much faith we can put in our civil engineering here in the United States. It reminds us that this documentary needs to answer a lot of serious questions if its to be taken seriously.
Once he decides to get down to business, Lee takes on one of the most intriguing subplots of Katrina: the decision of Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco to resist ceding military authority over her state to the U.S. Army, for cloudy reasons. A feud between Blanco and New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin has something to do with it, with the latter having broken ranks to campaign for Blanco's Republican opponent in the prior election. Blanco doesn't mount a strong defense of her decisions, but the film makes it clear that her hands were somewhat tied by having to contend with Nagin. Any random clip of him during the hurricane will make you wonder how he was ever elected to public office. "A total void" is how Blanco characterized him. When asked to give his recollection of the crucial moments on Air Force One with Blanco and President Bush, Nagin informs us that the President's plane is a "pimp mobile." He also seems to have forgotten the incident, described in Vanity Fair, in which he alarmed the Secret Service by sequestering himself in the airplane's bathroom and refusing to leave.
The remaining chapters of the film deal with the levee re-construction process, the criminal attempt by insurance companies to duck their claimants -- New Orleans has $30 billion in uninsured losses -- and the slipshod effort to regroup the city's population. Orleans Parish lost five-sixths of its people, most of them scattered to the four corners of the U.S.A. Faced with figures like that, what else is there to say? The film mentions some talk of a lawsuit filed by Governor Blanco to force the government to design a profit sharing program for oil exploration revenues generated in coastal waters off New Orleans, but no one seems to think anything will come of it. The final commentators are reduced to positing cruel fantasies, noting the fact that if New Orleans were to secede from the United States, it could claim ownership of its franchise as a major extraction hub. After all, it's the place where all of the country's seafood comes in and where the oil platforms are. "If we controlled all of this, everyone in New Orleans could drive a Bentley," someone says, with a sigh.









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-24-2006 @ 3:28PM
Kate McMains said...
This would have been a stronger film if more time was devoted to what was happening (or more importantly, not happening) with the reconstruction efforts. The reconstruction of New Orleans will be enormously profitable to some interests (Halliburton? gentrified real estate concerns?), and I would have liked to get a sense of the trail so we can "follow the money" in the coming years. I think film was emotionally definitive, but otherwise lacking.
Reply
8-24-2006 @ 3:33PM
Zac said...
"Lee does some of these people no favor by allowing them to expound on the fatuous belief that the levees were dynamited by the U.S. government to exterminate the black population of New Orleans. This canard is repeated ad nauseum throughout the film's first half, to its great detriment."
Were you watching the same first act I was? This is brought up briefly by a few residents and quickly dissmised as unlikely by experts. There is talk of dynamiting during Betsy--but only for maybe five minutes and hardly repeated 'ad nauseum.'
Never does the documentary take the position of levee conspiracy, only engineering incompetence. In my opinion Spike touches on the former viewpoints to show us the type of anger these people are feeling. When your house is destroyed and your family displaced and unreachable, rationalization gets replaced by anger.
Reply
8-24-2006 @ 3:45PM
Ryan Stewart said...
I never said the documentary takes a position. I said the interview subjects do. And the section on dynamiting Betsy - much longer than "five minutes" -is there for a reason - to draw parallels between that alleged bombing and the one alleged here.
And it's alleged repeatedly, even in the later moments of the film. One woman is asked if she will return to New Orleans when all is said and done, and she replies:
"If they wanted us in New Orleans, they wouldnt have tried to drown us."
Reply
8-24-2006 @ 4:01PM
Mike Schleifstein said...
As I said over at blogging new orleans, lee needed to open his viewpoint to the entire community instead of the the narrow focus the included false bomb allegations ... speaking of which levees have only been bombed once in new orleans history, in St. Bernard Parish in Challmette in the 1920 to avert a flood coming down the mississippi river from heavy rains up river, the New Orleans city leaders (read rich business men) decided to bomb the levee there in order to save the city, these promised the residents of st bernard a multi million dollar payoff for the bomb, then when the flooding broke a levee up river and the bombing ended up not being needed, the city and feds refused to pay for the clean up... in betsy and camille and now katrina people have accused some of bombing the levees to flood the city because it did happen once but it was to save the city not destroy it, but of course spike lee didn't do enough research to know this and the viewpoint was considered valid... I guess you have to be from the area to understand...
Reply
8-24-2006 @ 4:50PM
Jason Blosser said...
OK. Let's think about this for a minute.
Black liberal activist Spike Lee makes a FOUR HOUR TWENTY MINUTE mockumentary about any subject...?
I'm already starting to get sleepy.
Reply
8-24-2006 @ 6:07PM
ihatemovies said...
I hope the folks claiming that "they" bombed the levees to rid New Orleans of poor black people realize that one of the worst levee breaks occurred directly adjacent to Lakeview, the WHITEST neighborhood in the city.
Reply
8-24-2006 @ 9:05PM
Sy said...
What people don't realize with Katrina was that only 48% of the deaths were Blacks. This was from an area where well over 60% of the total populuation were Blacks.
Reply
8-25-2006 @ 3:52PM
Skippy said...
Spike Lee has made recent statements telling that he himself believes that the levees were blown up on purpose in order to get rid of the African-Americans from that area.
Reply
8-27-2006 @ 8:05AM
GhostDoggy said...
It is greatly disappointing when movie studios, directors, and producers can find little creativeness in their own guts than to pull off the pages of sensationalistic-news events to sell a dang movie ticket.
Hollywood is dead, and so is everyone in these so-called films. This is more inline with yellow-rag reading in motion. I'd rather have a B-movie based from pulp fiction than see this crap.
Next we'll have a movie about a Congresswomen with a bad hair jop slapping some D.C. police and call that moviemaking.
Reply
8-30-2006 @ 9:08AM
HNW said...
I am at a loss. I found the documentary to be worthwhile film, if for no other reason than to hear actual accounts by actual victims, instead of the typical political BSers. Color has NOTHING to do with this. Those of you who would dismiss and belittle Katrina victims' experiences and raw emotions because of your own personal feelings about Spike are stupid, ignorant and should have kept your ridiculous posts to yourselves. If you don't understand the victims' beliefs about bombings and conspiracies and feeling unwanted in certain areas, then you must not have known any older black folks. They went through hellish times in this country's history and many of them from down south believe what they believe for good reasons. If you can't understand that, it's not my place to inform you. And it's really not important to me that you get it.
I have never heard such insensitive, dismissive rhetoric about documentaries that discuss such historical events as the Holocaust or The World Trade Center attacks. No one dismisses what those survivors had to deal with. How ignorant you people are.
What I appreciated about the film was that it squashed a lot of the media's images and characterizatons of New Orleans citizens as criminals who didn't have anything, yet were looking for handouts. A lot of the stories that I have read about and seen on television show victims who were homeowners, taxpayers, business owners... The only thing that they wanted was help from their government, on all levels. And their government, on all levels, failed them miserably.
Let it have happened in your community, your city, your state, and I wonder how you would have handled having snooty, know-it-alls belittle what you and your family went through.
Grow the hell up.
Reply
8-30-2006 @ 11:34AM
ACgirl said...
I found myself getting pulled in by this film. I watched the film without getting up from my seat. I enjoyed hearing information that I had no clue about. Katrina was a wake-up call to all politician of what not to do in a emergency situation. To this day the buck is still being passed. Any person who can look past these people and not feel for them has no sense of compassion.
Reply
9-07-2006 @ 9:28PM
E. Relayson said...
I saw the last 2 acts of this documentary. After reading here, the gest of the first two acts, it will be a long time before I can watch them.
I'm a white New Orleanian, by several generations, now residing in neighboring Jefferson Parish. (considered predominatly white)
Lee had a story he had to tell, although it couldnt be long enough to tell all of
the story. He missed all the thousands of people who didnt live in the 9th ward. He missed the Heroes of this story. Those who put their own lives on the line and stayed on their jobs.
He told how the military treated them like cattle. A tough military was needed when the police authority was totally undermined. How do you reason with a
desperate and hysterical population?
The military does what they are trained to do. I suspect not many of them have been trained to "police" American citzens.
I think FEAR was a great factor for vigilanty behavior. Not a lot was mentioned about the bodies with bullet holes or the numbers of rapes and murders
during those 5 days (or since). It was a time when the strong preyed on the weak. We now hear reports how those stories were not true. But I heard eyewitness accounts from those who lived through it and know who tells the true story.
Friends and family who stayed got the word out mostly by email. "Stay away. It isnt safe. There isnt any gasoline to get out and no place to get food, water, or medical help". This was in areas outside of flooded New Orleans. People armed themselves to protect home and family. I've never liked guns or the NRA. But during this time "the right to bear arms" was a reality and in some cases a necessity. Neighbors watched each others backs. Then the government told ALL those who stayed through the storm to leave and not come back for weeks. State Police from almost every state came here to help restore order. There are many stories that will NOT be told, in a town that makes its living from tourism..
Lee highlights the false and ludicrous idea that the levees were blown up. I feel sad for these people who would think this, because it doesnt make any sense.
But our story just begins where this documentary ends. From the struggles with insurance companies and crooked contractors, high priced building materials (prices doubled from before Katrina) and the stupid bureaucratic laws and requirements that wont let us rebuild our own homes even if we have the means.
I think that Mr. Lee told a good story and
tried to tell it from all sides, but it is not by any means the whole story. I still applaud his efforts, because it is the most rounded story I've heard from anyone not from here. He captured the anger and frustration of the people who are still living the nightmare.
While all the national and inter-national "news" people who were all working real hard on that "award-winning STORY".
Our LOCAL TV stations haven shown us some of the best and truest stories about what happened here. This wasnt just a story to them. This happened to them, their homes and their families too. They knew the horror and the loss. They didnt just observe, they suffered with us.
My neighbors (I've known all my life) won't be back. I don't feel as safe in my neighborhood as I was before Katrina. My sister and her family sold their house and moved away. My mental and physical health has deteriated. Many doctors and medical people didnt come back after Katrina.
I'm writing this from my mostly white, mostly middle class neighborhood, about
5 miles from the WEST side of the 17th street canal - From my ratty FEMA trailor,
(my home for the last 10 months) in the front of my gutted house. I left home on Aug 28, 2005 and have not been home since.
My home had a bathtub I could sit in and a toilet I didnt have to treat with chemicals and flush out with the garden hose every week. My home had an oven and I didnt have to get the propane tanks refilled when the hot water or the stove stopped working. I had a bed with a real mattress, not a 2 inch piece of foam on plywood. My home had a closet. I didnt have to screw in hooks and hang my clothes on the walls. My home had my mothers pictures and my grandmother's grandmother's quilt. It held 20 yrs of music books and church musical arrang-ments I wrote. Things that will never be returned to me. I got off easy compared to others. Others got off easier than I did. But we all lost the New Orleans we had before Katrina and thatis a loss that is felt by all of us.
Reply