Review: Crank
Filed under: Action, New Releases, Lionsgate Films, Theatrical Reviews

Less a movie than a blunt instrument, Crank is an explosion of sex and violence, set to a deafening soundtrack and cobbled together by a crazed editor. From the look of it, first-time directors Mark Neveldine and Brian Taylor wanted to make a compact film -- it's only 83 minutes (they're long, long minutes) -- but refused to leave out a single one of the insane images and visual flourishes they'd been collecting in their heads in preparation for their cinematic debut (both men come from an advertising background). As a result, the film has a terrible case of ADD: Scenes are chock-full of unnecessary visual touches that, while striking and interesting if used judiciously, quickly lose their power when they show up in every scene -- several times.
Jason Statham plays Chev Chelios, a hitman with possibly the most absurd name in the history of cinema. He awakens one morning with blurred vision -- the handheld camera shows us his point-of-view -- and in extreme physical pain, but with no idea what happened to him. Careening around his huge, warehouse-style apartment, he comes upon a DVD resting on his (of course) giant flat-screen television. And from the obscenity scrawled on its face, we can assume the disc wasn't there when Chelios went to bed. The star of the DVD is Verona (Jose Pablo Cantillo), a cringingly stereotypical Latino Villain who chews through the limited scenery as he gleefully tells Chelios he's been poisoned with "some Chinese sh*t", and has just an hour or so to live. So the movie opens with its central character already dead (much like D.O.A. did way back in 1950 -- and then again in 1988), and the bad guy's confession already out of the way: Forget solving a crime (already done) or avoiding danger (no point): Chelios gets to spend the whole movie trying to track down and kill Verona before his time runs out. Needless to say, blood will be spilled, limbs severed and cars crashed in the process.
And, as if the early setup wasn't enough of an excuse for pure action, it soon becomes apparent to our hero that when his heart stops pounding, he quickly begins to fade. Describing his symptoms by phone to his sketchy personal physician Doc Miles (country star Dwight Yoakam, wonderful as always), Chelios hears a lot of movie medical mumbo jumbo, all of which means that a rapid flow of adrenaline is the only thing that will keep him alive. Of course, since the conversation takes place while Chelios is high on cocaine and driving his car through a mall, one gets the impression he already knew the prognosis.
Now that all the excuses are firmly in place, Neveldine and Taylor can start the action in earnest -- and start they do. There are probably five minutes in the entire film not filled with the sound of either pounding music, gunshots or crunching metal -- and generally all three are happening at once. On his way to both find Verona and rescue his naïve girlfriend Eve (Amy Smart, playing the same role she always does, with about the same degree of success) -- she thinks he's a computer programmer -- from the thugs he thinks are heading her way, Chelios grimly rampages his way through Los Angeles leaving abject destruction (not to mention lots and lots of bodies) in his wake. (Crank is a very much a kitchen sink action movie: Everything is in there, sometimes twice. Everything.)
All of which could have resulted in a highly enjoyable movie. But Crank isn't. Instead, it feels more like an assault we have to survive, largely because, though the movie is full of the sort of jokes frequently used by action directors to disarm extreme violence (Severed hands: Always funny.), it has a unremittingly grim tone. Statham spends virtually the entire film either swooning or sporting a nasty, tough guy snarl, and he runs/drives/rides through the movie like a soldier assigned a task; it's as if he's trying to get through the 83 minutes just like we are, and is enjoying it just as little.
Jokes in action movies work best when there's a certain acknowledged absurdity to the film. When, after shooting dozens of men in Terminator 2, Arnold Schwarzenegger grunts "They're not dead," we laugh in spite of ourselves because the movie itself knows how silly it all is. Like everyone the Terminator meets in the film, our feelings for him are a combination of awe at his robo-Austrian physique and power, and gentle mocking at his inability to understand the world around him. Crank, however, has none of that. When Statham makes cracks about Verona's brother, or plays with that old reliable severed hand, it's all done with the same seriousness of purpose he brings to shooting his handler's henchman in the head, or terrorizing a hospital. And, since we're clearly supposed to think he's the coolest, baddest guy ever to be poisoned in his sleep, there's no room for mocking, either within the movie or without it. As a result the humor falls flat, and serves only to remind us of violence it's try to disarm.
At its core, Crank is nothing more or less than a male fantasy come to life. Bare breasts abound at every turn; rampant, consequence-free violence (at one point, Chelios gets shot; though he complains at the time, it's never spoken of again) and public sex, complete with cheering crowds, provide monotonous set-pieces. (The fact that the sex scene starts out with the woman -- his girlfriend Eve -- repeatedly shouting "NO!" and pushing him away is, of course, completely dismissed.) To that end, it's likely to do huge business with that tantalizing late-teen/early twenties male demographic, who will eat up the naughty, noisy allure of the whole thing, without ever noticing that it's sloppy and unfocused. Which is too bad, because there are fleeting moments in the film -- a quiet conversation between Chelios and Doc Miles, a wonderful, blissful scene set to Harry Nilsson's "Everybody's Talkin' at Me" -- that suggest Neveldine and Taylor have the ability to do more than slap together naughtiness and action sequences. The inevitable box office success of Crank, however, is likely to bind them to that assembly line for a long time to come.









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-02-2006 @ 10:50PM
michael said...
i saw crank today. and i thought that it was an amazing and intense adrenaline pumper. in this review it talks about "ADD" and "unnessecary visual touches" which i think are an amazing and unique addition to the movie. you are drawn into the film when this visual touches make you feel as he does when the drugs slow down his heart and make him trip as drugs do and give him the need for adrenaline. and it also has a suprising, unique ending. Overall, i give this film an A+++, 5 stars, a 10 out of 10. its amazing, and everyone should go see it. it will have you feeling pumped up and it will make you feel like going out and running around when you leave the theater.
Reply
9-03-2006 @ 2:13AM
Michelle said...
I completely agree with Martha, the film is unfocused, and it falls completely flat when it tries to be funny, and overall, it is just plain stupid and offensive. The fact that the main female character is about as intelligent as a two-year old is incredibly insulting. But even worse, as Martha mentioned, her boyfriend basically rapes her in public to a standing ovation; yes, I know she consents eventually, but when he starts to tear her dress off, and she keeps shouting 'NO' and trying to run away, that is definitely not consensual -- in fact, it's just sickening. So is the fact that all of the other women in the film serve only as ornaments, at one point even imprisoned in clear spheres, only necessary as sex objects. And to add insult to injury, it's just a stupid film. It's unrealistic, irritating, and a waste of time and money. And if you review it as an A+++ movie, I feel sorry for you, because you have a serious lack of taste.
Reply
9-05-2006 @ 9:02PM
Richard von Busack said...
Lovely, wasn't it? Just what the world needs, an 83 minute long Mountain Dew commercial. But people who think of it as hard-hitting must be novices to the movies--I've never seen such a suburban kid's wild idea of what a hit-man's life is like. And the violence was completely pain-free, as if made by bubble-boys who'd seen 100,000 deaths on tv but never so much as stubbed their toes once; Remember when the incredibly poorly acted villain calls himself a Shakespeare of evil? Here's some real Shakespeare: "He jests at scars who never felt a wound".
Reply
9-08-2006 @ 3:21AM
Jared Falco said...
This movie made a whole lot more sense when read that Mark Neveldine and Brian Taylor were in the advertising business because this movie is an 83 min. add with no product. Associating this movie with ADD (like the first reviewer) or retardation is an extreme and demoralizing insult to people with ADD and Down-syndrome everywhere. If you can manage ignore or get past the idiocy of the stereotypical Hispanic villains or the obscene racist remarks of Chiv (wtf name is Chiv anyway, Jesus Christ) like “I’m gonna kick some black ass” you wont be able to get over the fact that this man would have been dead after 5 min of walking out of that hospital. Anyone who took a community college course in first aid would be able to tell you that not only would those substances he was ingesting throughout the move not been keeping him alive but the coke/epinephrine combo alone would have been enough to kill him and the shock from the defibrillator would put a healthy man into cardiac arrest but not Chiv Chilios! HE DA MANZ! I wish the writers would have taken some cash from the FX budget and hired a medical advisor or at least used some common sense instead of pulling everything directly out of their forth point of contact. All that can be forgiven, but what really chaps my ass is the freefall scene where he falls for about 1:45-2 minutes from a helicopter. In the real world, when skydivers are doing a high altitude low opening jumps from an airplane (because a helicopter can’t get that high) at an avg. of 26,000 feet they get a max of 45-50 sec. of freefall. This movie is an insult to anyone with at least 2 working brain cells an I am officially dumber for having seen it, the only solace I get is the fact that I downloaded it of a torrent and had the privilege of being able to fast forward though scenes. I pity those who not only paid money for it, but had to sit there and see it from start to end. But I’m sure my generation AKA the reality tv/jackass/American idol generation would eat this crap up with a silver spoon. I really hope it bombs but I know how know dumb people can be, and how much they love mindless crap, if it does well enough I’m sure those idiot writers will figure out a way to make a sequel or dare I say it, a prequel. God save us.
Reply
10-23-2006 @ 11:55PM
Carmine Rola said...
CRANK was a kickin 10 out of 10 Sooo cool!!!! It seems to make fun of action films, but with better action, and DARK, DARK COMEDY. Uh, the Chinatown scene - will go down in history. CRANK IS AWESOME.
Reply