
This past Wednesday, I wrote a short piece about Fanboys, a movie dedicated to recapturing the spirit of pre-Episode One Star Wars fandom. Since penning said post (figuratively penning, of course, typing would be a more accurate word) I've been thinking about my old Star Wars fanboy nature in a fashion which can best be described as wistful and nostalgic. I'm not going to go into a long description of what Star Wars meant to me growing up, because it would just be rehashing Wednesday's post. You all know what your first and prominent geek love means to you; it outranked even Marvel in my preteen-teen and teen years of the 1990s. What I do want to discuss with you today is just an oddball observation I've made in the midst of my nostalgia bender: I don't own the new trilogy.
I've been trying to wrap my brain around why this might be. I mean, I try to keep my DVD shelf operating at a rather high standard, but let's be honest -- I own a lot of DVDs, many of which are probably of lower quality than the new Star Wars movies. Particularly given my geek leanings, I tend to buy just about any sci-fi/fantasy movie which I'm vaguely interested in, if for no other reason than to watch the making-ofs and listen to the audio commentaries. Even a bad geek flick will generally earn a few trips through my DVD player, because I am both a geek and a movie journalist. I will qualify this by saying I do have SOME standards. I don't, for instance, own Catwoman, and I've certainly never paid money for Battlefield Earth (although I do sort of like the book) or Bloodrayne. Essentially, what I'm saying is if you make a half decent geek flick with some elements I can find enjoyment in, I will probably buy your DVD eventually.To be fair, we've got to admit there were several really cool elements about the new trilogy. Like it or hate it, you can point to a dozen or more really amazing bits, and they certainly rank above some of the movies I currently own. For instance, it is hard to argue with some of the lightsaber battles in the new movies -- they fulfill everything we've dreamed about lightsaber battles since we first saw Luke swinging around his dad's blade.
And if I'm honest, I've always just presumed I'd end up owning them some day. Even after leaving the theater with the vaguely dissatisfied taste in my mouth (you know the one) from seeing The Phantom Menace for the first time, I knew I'd have the thing on my shelf someday if for no other reason than that odd, insistent dedication which comes with being a true fanboy. You know, it is the same weird need which made you read the Onslaught issues of Marvel comics.
But I don't own the new trilogy, which in turn begs the question: Am I a true fanboy? Truthfully, I don't know the answer to that anymore. I still adore Star Wars, but I don't follow it with the absurd, nearly religious conviction of the true nut job fans. I really don't know everything there is to know about the universe anymore, because I just haven't cared to invest that much time in learning about the new stuff related to my generation's trilogy. I've still got absurd knowledge of all things pre-Phantom Star Wars, but said knowledge only represents a portion of the Star Wars continuum now. Additionally, my rabid appetite for merch has been cooled to near nonexistence in the post-Phantom age.
Fanboy questions aside, the answer to my DVD question, I have finally decided, is as follows: While I am perfectly willing to buy average quality sci-fi flicks, most of these flicks do not actively remind me of how much better they should have been. Your run-of-the-mill sci-fi flick is just that -- it is average, and you know that going in. When watching the new Star Wars movies, it is hard to not be permanently thinking about how much better you really wanted them to be. It'd be like making a cardboard cut-out of my father with some interesting quips voice recorded into it. Sure, it looks like dad, and sounds like dad, but mostly, it just makes me miss my father. Why bother hanging out with a cut-out when I could just schedule a quick visit to my parents' place? When I'm really jonesing for Star Wars, I am always going to pop in the classic trilogy. That's why I can't buy the new stuff -- it just makes me wish it was something more.
I'm not ragging on you if you dig the new stuff. Honestly, I wish I was you. I envy you. And if you are a long time fanboy who owns both trilogies and it doesn't bother you in the least; if you think the new trilogy stands up to the SW heritage, good for you. Again, I envy you, I'm not mocking you. I just wish I could figure out how you do it ...













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-20-2006 @ 3:44PM
Ted W said...
Does the new trilogy hold up again the classic trilogy? Not in my book, but I still own both. Why? The new trilogy is still better than a lot of other sci-fi out there, and as far as I'm concerned, is still a fun ride (most of the time). Plus the extras on the dvds are pretty cool.
Reply
9-20-2006 @ 4:26PM
LoserHero said...
I completely agree with the envy part... It also disturbs me that those who saw the new star wars are take in much more for the special effects then they are for the story, although the old trilogy did have outstanding effects for its time something about that story made it almost legendary to me...
Reply
9-20-2006 @ 7:38PM
Rob O'Daniel said...
Dunno that I could agree with that "The new trilogy is still better than a lot of other sci-fi out there" statement. When George made the frist movies, the special effects were so difficult, time-consuming, and expensive that he didn;t dare include fx just for the sake of fx. The 2nd trilogy is all fluff and no substance. At a time when any 15-year old kid with a decent PC can hack out respectable CGI effects, George chose to ladle on eye candy that's at the same time, overwhelming, under-impressive, and detremental to the story. Sad...
Reply
9-20-2006 @ 10:19PM
JeffConn said...
There's an old fannish quote that goes something like: "The golden age of science fiction is when you were 10." For instance, i looked at Star Wars through a kid's eyes and went "WOW" when the Imperial ship took FOREVER to pass through the opening shot of A New Hope, and fell in love with Star Wars. I have a son who went "WOW" during the pod race in Episode 1, and fell in love with Star Wars.
For what it's worth, i think both trilogies, Clone Wars, and the Ewok movies all add to the Star Wars heritage.
Reply
9-20-2006 @ 11:13PM
John B said...
I agree with JeffConn's quote. I saw ANH when I was 15, and I will always hold a special place in my heart for it and the original trilogy.
I guess I am one of the few fans who even likes the prequils. The CGI does not bother me. When looked at from a different perspective Jar Jar is no more annoying to me than the Ewoks were. I give it to Lucas that he has to make the movies appeal to a broad audience. Jar Jar is something the kids can laugh at.
I have not bought the re-release of the classic trilogy yet because I am confused by the packaging. I keep reading online that the original versions are 16x9 but not enhanced. I looked at a disc cover in the store quickly and I swear it says the original versions are 4:3. I don't want 4:3 versions.
Mark, if it makes you feel any better I don't have the three other movies you mentioned, but I have some stuff that might be considered stinkers, like the dvd collection of Space:1999. I tend to be the kind of person that will watch (or by at a decent price) just about any sci-fi movie, even if it is not the best of the best.
Reply
9-21-2006 @ 7:16AM
gaming8787 said...
You like the old movies because they were an outstanding morality play.
The new movies suck because their just a giant navel-gazing exsercise in moral equivalence and obfuscation.
Reply
9-21-2006 @ 10:37AM
Unnamed Source #10485-295(a) said...
I actually get that same feeling of "coulda/shoulda/woulda" every time I watch RETURN OF THE JEDI with my kids. I was 10 when I saw STAR WARS with my Dad (on opening day, no less, and before the fancy LucasFilm logo or the whole "Episode IV" stuff), and I still rank it as my favorite, though I think EMPIRE is the best of the original trilogy, if only by a bit margin.
RETURN could have been SO much friggin' better. Set on Kashyyk (sp?), wookies instead of oompa loompas -- I mean, Ewoks. The opps are endless.
Reply
9-25-2006 @ 9:58PM
Geoff said...
I'm not a true Star-Wars fanboy, but I do own all six films.
I had a week off last week, and thus came to the obvious conclusion: 12-hour Star Wars sesh. So I bought much popcorn and wrapped a blanket round me to get in the Jedi mood, and off I went.
An hour into Phantom Menace, I gave up and just watched Empire Strikes Back instead. Cool moments are one thing, but Jar-Jar Binks and a six-year old Darth Vader who yells "yippee!" at every given opportunity are quite another.
Reply
9-26-2006 @ 2:35AM
dp said...
I have to agree with you. I am even thinking of buying the 'new' version of the original trilogy, well Star Wars (Not 'New Hope' in my book!) at least, even though I brought the first boxset last year. I can see myself enjoying the owning of this more rather than complete the series by buying 1-3. I'm afraid after leaving the cinema after PM I felt Lucas had crushed my dreams and owning any reminder of this feels like a betrayal of that halcycon summer of '77 when as an 8 year the world appeared to change.
Reply