Review: Saw 3
Filed under: Horror, Thrillers, Lionsgate Films, Theatrical Reviews, Remakes and Sequels

So now comes the third consecutive Halloween with yet another visit from everyone's favorite ironic torture-master -- and the result is a bloody good time for those movie fans who appreciate copious doses of horrific torture mixed in with a satisfyingly dark sense of (very twisted) morality. Yes, it's Jigsaw time again, a brief moment of rejoicing for those who enjoy a "body count"-style horror flick that's got just a little bit extra going on in the brains department -- and in the horror genre, "just a little brains" is a whole lot more than most of the flicks bother to offer.
Probably best recommended only to those who already like Saw and Saw 2, Saw 3 delivers more of the same mayhem, plus an appreciable dose of dark chills, morbid thrills, and just enough in the "ultra-sick morality tale" department to keep the brainier horror geeks happy. And while it's certainly not destined to go down in history as a brilliant piece of filmmaking, Saw 3 represents the closure of a horror trilogy that, hell, manages to stand head and shoulders above most of its contemporaries -- unless you happen to consider the Part Twos of Freddy, Jason and Michael to be really excellent pieces of horror -- which I don't.
The plot this time around focuses on a dejected-yet-brilliant female doctor who is kidnapped by our lovely villain(s) and forced to keep the tumor-afflicted Jigsaw alive while a new victim wanders through a warehouse filled with devious and deadly pieces of machinery. Fans of the whole series will delight in the few new pieces of "backstory flashback," most of which manage to add a few juicy shades to an already colorful saga. Call the Saw series a soap opera for the vicariously bloodthirsty and you're halfway to understanding the appeal of these flicks. The (remaining) cast members are all present and accounted for -- at the beginning of Act I, anyway. Series regulars Tobin Bell, Shawnee Smith, Dina Meyer and Donnie Wahlberg contribute some grim good times, while newcomers Bahar Soomekh and Angus MacFadyen do a fine job of screaming, shrieking and wincing at the appropriate moments.
And solid points to the Saw-makers (Darren Lynn Bousman, Leigh Whannell, James Wan) for trying to push the envelope each time out, not only in the Gore & Terror department, but also where things like irony, creativity and motivation are concerned. (Plus you gotta love those multiple-twist endings, no matter how outlandish they might be.) Trash the Saw movies all you like, and you'll probably make some valid points while doing so, but there's no denying that the movies have a lot more of a brain that, say Final Destination 3 or The Grudge 2. There's a reason that this series has exploded at the box office while other sequels wither on the vine -- and it's not just because of the physical nastiness and the perpetually rusty torture devices.
Boasting some of the harshest and most creepily creative dispatches of the entire series, Saw 3 ends the (opening) trilogy in fine fashion. The fans will get everything they're expecting, and then some, while enjoying a few dark twists and turns that they probably didn't see coming. It's basically a popcorn movie, albeit one that's geared for movie geeks who love to see the envelope pushed and the characters punished. Frankly I see these flicks as cathartic exercises, gloriously dark and vicious little roller coasters that allow us to exorcise some inner demons and burgeoning frustrations while scarfing down a coke and some extra-buttery popcorn. The real world's a pretty nasty place, and I find it a little comforting when a piece of fiction can get even nastier than the evening news. For all its ugliness, brutality and shrieking pieces of mayhem, I left Saw 3 feeling like I'd just gone through a particularly effective therapy session. One with bear traps, buzz saw blades, and a whole lot of impromptu brain surgery.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-30-2006 @ 11:50PM
jmchez said...
Glad to see you enjoyed your torture porn. I'll take that into account when considering your other movie reviews.
Reply
10-31-2006 @ 4:59PM
Jason said...
Thanks for adding something relevant jmchez. Sheesh. Anywho, torture porn or not this was a pretty cool flick. I would defintely only recommend it to people that liked the first one (and tolerated the second). This added enough to actually make those movies better while doing a clever job of explaining the really really ludicrous twist of the first one. I don't know if they just tacked it on after reading all the criticisms, but I dug it.
Reply
11-02-2006 @ 5:12AM
Noa said...
Nice job, jmchez, for judging a person by their particular tastes (which don't necessarily suit your own). I'm going to go ahead and make a quick assumption about your character too - you're a fundamentalist catholic who has nothing better to do than harass people for their own opinions and likings.
Anyway, nice review on Saw III. I thought it was a tough movie to sit through, but I watch it for the characterization. I always found Jigsaw's reasoning intriguing, and the complicated relationship between himself and Amanda was explored rather well, I thought.
Reply
11-05-2006 @ 7:56AM
Kat said...
It's really refreshing to see a fan of the genre review a good horror movie rather than just your average jaded movie critic. I loved to movie, gore and all, and felt it brought the entire series full circle. Unlike so many series before it, the Saw movies have never lost the original spirit throughout the movies. They'll truly stand the test of time.
Reply
12-27-2006 @ 4:14AM
Carlos Idelone said...
Thanks for your focus on the interesting premise of the Saw films. Their clever play with morality and judgement draws us in, as we all have opinions on these issues. Jigsaw plays the role of the severe God of the Old Testament, taking people to task for the way they are living their lives. Tough love at the edge. The calm, strong voice of Tobin Bell and his earnest demeanor tend to make us sit up and pay attention. I found the torture set pieces in Saw III a bit much and some were definitely too much (and totally implausible), and I feel, that they took away from the more important personal relationships between the characters. However the clever ending delivered the goods, especially the last tape recording. The theater was silent after the film. I tend to admire downer, disturbing endings in horror films, a la Night of the Living Dead. That's the real result of nightmares. Leave the Doris Day endings for other genres. I like your remark about admiring films, that can out-nasty real life. At least they're just films!
Reply
11-08-2006 @ 10:18PM
Raquel Reid said...
Well what can I say, this was a good horror movie.
9/10 for the gore!!
Reply
11-16-2006 @ 1:52AM
Robin Bidwell said...
I'm not really a fan of horror flicks but I have to say, SAW aint so bad. It's comforting to know that there's finally an ending! I can't imagine keeping up with nonstop killing and torture.Add a 4 and 5 and it's most likely gonna end up as a series of trashy low-budget B movies. Good to know that Donnie Wahlberg's a survivor in this one. That's more than I can say for his career as a New Kid On The Block.
Reply
12-28-2006 @ 6:39PM
Twentysomething said...
Good review but I can't stomach these movies. I watched the first two thinking they would be good horror flicks, but yeah... they really struck me as torture porn too. I'm not judging anyone who likes this stuff, but I really don't see how all this gore is appealing... Honestly the difference is the quality of the production. It looks too real. Too believable. Sick. I can watch cheezy zombie movies from the 80's because they're funny-- they're so fake. But this realistic stuff disturbs the hell outta me.
But to each his own of course-- this is coming from a young atheist libertarian. I'm glad there are producers out there exercising our freedom of speech... even if this is the result.
Reply