And So it Begins: The YouTube Copyright Smackdown
Filed under: Comedy, Documentary, Drama, Independent, Celebrities and Controversy, Family Films, Movie Marketing, Politics, Cinematical Indie
Ah, YouTube we hardly knew ye. The video upload site grew rapidly into a site big and bad enough to make Google sit up and take notice to the tune of a $1.65 billion buyout last month, largely because YouTube kind of overlooked the whole issue of who actually owned the stuff people were uploading to their site. Hence, users would upload the funniest bits from shows like The Daily Show, The Colbert Report -- the kind of stuff people actually want to watch -- in addition to the plethora of videos like that fascinating footage of ripping off a nasty fungal-infected toenail, or a banana spider munching a grub (okay, that one was actually kinda cool). Now that Google and its deep pockets are in the game, though, the rules are changing.Boing Boing reported last week that Comedy Central has requested that YouTube take down all Comedy Central-owned content, including clips from The Daily Show, The Colbert Report and South Park. At the moment, it doesn't appear that YouTube is enforcing this terribly well (or perhaps it's just taking them awhile to catch up with the mountain of Comedy Central stuff on the site), because I found a ton of Daily Show clips still going strong. Boing Boing notes that in an interview with Wired, The Daily Show host Jon Stewart pretty much encouraged viewers to get content from the internet, saying, "I look at systems like the Internet as a convenience. I look at it as the same as cable or anything else. Everything is geared toward more individualized consumption. Getting it off the Internet is no different than getting it off TV." Apparently Stewart's hard-ass bosses around Comedy Central disagree, at least now that YouTube is owned by Google. Comedy Central shows clips on their own sites, but as a commenter on the Boing Boing piece noted, the quality there isn't great.
I can see Comedy Central's point on the copyright issue, but on the other hand, YouTube has probably done more to give Comedy Central free marketing of their shows than any other internet site. I'd stopped watching The Daily Show for a while, just because of time constraints, but then I kept having friends direct me to hilarious clips on YouTube, and after awhile I felt like I was missing out on so much fun stuff that I became a regular Daily Show user again -- now I'm back up to my two-to-three night a week Jon Stewart habit -- and sometimes I even stick around for a chaser of The Colbert Report.
All this makes me wonder what the broader impact of Google purchasing YouTube will be. There's so much potential for studios to promote their films through sites like YouTube, but piracy and copyright concerns are huge hurdles to get past. You'll always be able to get your videos of various people trying to be the next zefrank, but your days of finding sneaky footage of films in production are numbered now that YouTube has evolved from interesting anomaly to corporate site with big, deep pockets.
What do you think, readers? The concept behind YouTube was "broadcast yourself, " but could studios use sites like YouTube as marketing portals to better promote certain types of films? I can't see really promoting, say, Babel on there, but the YouTube stuff on Borat is pretty popular. YouTube seems to be a great place for promoting a comic film like Borat that needs a wider awareness to really draw the big box office -- but how long will it be before all the cool Borat stuff is replaced with: "This video has been removed due to terms of use violation."
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-31-2006 @ 2:33PM
TheOne said...
As long as they don't try to put ad's on before each clip I think it will still do well, but if that changes it's all over. If the ad is funny enough it will end up as it on clip on youtube as we have seen.
Reply
10-31-2006 @ 2:52PM
MosquitoControl said...
TheOne, what do you mean "still do well."
The company has enormous expenses and virtually no income right now. And no hope of income. To recover costs and make any form of a profit they only have a few options:
1) Charge users. But no one will go for this, the joy of youtube is that anyone can upload and anyone can view. Making it a pay community will, well, destroy the community.
2) Put ads before the video. But, considering how many of these videos are under a minute long, having to deal with a 5-15 second ad will discourage users and make them find other sites. No one will sit through ads to get to the short videos.
3) Put ads on the site. But so many people just embed the videos on their myspace/blog/whatever, meaning the video is seen by people that never go to youtube.com. So those ads will help but not cure.
4) Put ads, like banners, on the bottom of the videos. Maybe the only solution, but will it annoy users enough to go elsewhere?
I see no way for youtube to profit. None. I'd honestly expect youtube to be forgotten in five years to a decade, simply dead and gone.
Reply
10-31-2006 @ 4:49PM
verbal said...
so they're having them take a few minute long Comedy Central clips, but no one's bothered to ask them to take the whole Stay Alive film down yet?
Reply
10-31-2006 @ 5:29PM
Chuck said...
I have a feeling it's because Comedy Central is putting their content online, now. Before, you had to go find each individual clip and string together a show. I just saw an ad last night on the Daily Show that said, "You can watch the previous night's entire episode instead of finding it on some crappy blog."
I'm assuming they're doing this to get people to watch their content on their site, instead of youtube, so they can put advertising on it and make money. Forcing youtube to take their content offline gives internet users only one option.
Reply
11-03-2006 @ 12:58AM
Geoff said...
As much as I love the accessibility of YouTube, I can see Comedy Central's point on this.
Of course, the problem will be enforcing the rule. Even if YouTube manage to take all the stuff down (and keep it down, which is potentially harder), the content will likely go up somewhere else. And somewhere else after that. And so on.
Reply