Film Clips: Too Much Borat -- Who's the Man Behind the Moustache?
Filed under: Comedy, Foreign Language, Celebrities and Controversy, Box Office, 20th Century Fox, Movie Marketing, Politics, Columns, Toronto International Film Festival, Cinematical Indie

Is Sacha Baron Cohen making a huge mistake by focusing on promoting his film Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan solely in character? In a thoughtful piece for the AP, Ryan Pearson ponders this question, discussing Cohen's staunch refusal to step out of his Borat character for interviews, the practically unheard of insistence that print reporters pre-submit questions before being granted interviews, and the bizarre interviews themselves, at which Cohen-as-Borat reportedly reads his answers off a teleprompter. Pearson also alludes to what I see as the more important focal point of the press cult surrounding Borat: The willingness of people who are ostensibly journalists, playing along with Cohen hiding behind the Borat mask with all the tolerance of a benign parent sheepishly sitting there while their child hurls breadsticks and croutons in the general direction of other restaurant patrons, and shrugging as if to say, "Geez, what can I do? He just won't stop -- but he's so gosh-darn cute, isn't he?"
Apparently, Cohen and his people think that keeping him enmeshed in his Borat character is effective in promoting the film, and enough entertainment journalists have gone along with the gag to convince Cohen he's on the right track. I tend to agree more with Pearson's take, though -- it was one thing for Cohen to show up as Borat at the film's Toronto premiere, but it's another thing entirely journalists agree to pre-submit interview questions, or when a female reporter -- from CNN, of all places -- plays along with the Borat routine, joking about being sent back to her cage. I'll give you a minute to ponder that.
I understand the desire for access to celebrity driving all this, the thrill of landing a one-on-one interview with Cohen -- but if he's not doing the interview as himself rather than his character, what the hell is the point? I mean, sure, we all know when we interview actors and directors as part of a press tour, that they're there to promote a film, and we play along in the hopes that we can elicit enough relevant and interesting responses to our questions to justify the fact that we are, in fact, a cog in the wheel of a giant marketing machine. But if your interview subject has abandoned all pretense of answering questions in a meaningful way, and you go in knowing that -- and then print the result as if it's actually something meaningful -- haven't you pretty much cut loose whatever threads still tied you to that vast, abstract concept of journalistic integrity?
Borat has a rather dismal awareness factor with the general movie-going populace (to give some perspective here, Borat -- which is quite possibly the most brilliant political comedy of the last decade, at least -- is expected to get smoked by The Santa Clause 3 at the box office), you might think that this would be the time for Cohen to be speaking out as himself about his film and why people should want to shell out $10 to see it instead of Tim Allen doing his shtick, or cozying up to Brad Pitt and Cate Blanchett in the equally good (albeit slightly more dark and depressing) Babel. When even NPR is buzzing about how your film is likely to take a Snakes On a Plane-esque nosedive (and I'll just overlook that even having a reason to compare a film as relevant, entertaining and intelligent as Borat to SOAP is, in and of itself, a travesty), you know you're in trouble. You might think that it's time to drop the cutesy, "Hey look, I'm Borat!" routine and start talking about why people should get their butts to the theater to see your film, already.
Interestingly, NPR also had a story on All Things Considered today about how 18-24 year olds are expected to have a high turnout at next week's election. According to the 11th Biannual Youth Survey on Politics and Public Service from Harvard's Institute of Politics, 60% of the 18-24 year-olds polled feel our country is on the wrong track. A whopping 67% feel that President Bush is not doing a good job leading our country. They trust the United Nations than in their own government, and 44% don't trust either the Democrats or the Republicans to "handle the global war on terrorism." With the election next week, the political message behind Borat has never been more timely, and 18-24 year-olds should be near the bullseye of the marketing target for this film. But it's hard to hear the message from the man behind the mask when he keeps telling you to just ignore that man behind the curtain. Keep it funny, sure, but be relevant and give them more than "he's a funny guy in a lime-green thong" to draw them there.
Much as I like Cohen's film, this whole thing leaves a nasty taste in my mouth, and I'm starting to feel like he's the flavor of the month that just isn't going to stick. Tell us -- and Cohen -- what you think, Cinematical readers. Is he making a giant misstep hiding behind Borat and his moustache? Or is this really part of a secretly brilliant plan that will ultimately pay off at the box office? And what do you think about entertainment reporters kowtowing to the whole "Cohen-as-Borat," pre-submitted questions, interview-answers-read-off-a-teleprompter-routine?









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-02-2006 @ 11:53AM
Alan said...
I think his Borat impression is actually making people NOT want to see the film. It seems that older people just think he's a weirdo with a film. If Cohen did interviews as himself, people would understand that he a comedian -- and will hopefully then see the movie since they know it's a comedy/satire. I'm a Borat fan, but in every interview I've seen he just repeats the same shtick over and over. The SNL bit didn't even make me laugh (okay, maybe a little chuckle). I sincerely hope the movie is much better than all of the lame promotion he's done for this movie.
Reply
11-02-2006 @ 11:58AM
Neoxkc said...
@ Alan
But it probably won't.
At least I have my doubts.
Reply
11-02-2006 @ 12:56PM
Hans said...
So right. Where are the days of hard hitting, news breaking, in depth Entertainment News?
Reply
11-02-2006 @ 12:59PM
Cath said...
A joke is like a souffle: it's easy to fall flat if you overdo it. And humor that relies on putting others in awkward social situations can ultimately turn people off if they fear their own victimhood. Particularly as stories start to surface like the one reported in Newsweek of the TV producer at WAPT in Jackson, Mississippi who lost her job because of her interview with Cohen.
Reply
11-02-2006 @ 3:00PM
Dels said...
I don't think you're giving Cohen enough credit. He's more like Andy Kaufman in the way he deals with the media. He clearly gets off on fucking with everyone in every way imaginable; the fact that he's getting away with it is testament to how good he is. Like Kaufman, his sheer charisma is getting him places where he should normally never be able to reach.
Reply
11-02-2006 @ 3:08PM
Eve said...
Cohen isn't new to the entertainment biz. Americans may not know him, but he's already an enormous celebrity in Europe. He took the same approach in Britain of always staying in character, and found both great success and the privacy that comes from being a famous person the public doesn't actually recognize or know much about. I can see why he'd want to stick with a plan that works. He's an intelligent, guarded man who takes fame on his own terms instead of jumping into the entertainment media meat grinder for consumption. It is also worth noting that the more people recognize him the harder his comedy work becomes by its nature. And even if the movie is not a huge hit in American theatres I'll wager it does well on video and internationally.
Reply
11-02-2006 @ 3:20PM
John K said...
On one hand, for people like me who just never had time to watch Da Ali G Show and get to know the character, then it's a way to raise awareness to the film in order to get butts in the seats. On the flip side, if the film is really as good as most early reviews say it is and the satire is as strong, then perhaps some actual dialogue with Sacha Baron Cohen on why he did the film and what he wanted us to actually learn from it would also be helpful. I know I'll be there, at least.
Reply
11-03-2006 @ 7:41AM
Michael said...
Sirius ran a repeat interview yesterday with Sacha/Borat on the Bower show where he discussed the filming of the movie. It really was a fascinating interview, most of it was with SBC with only the occasional lapse into Borat when it was appropriate. As this post suggests it was much more effective in promoting the film than having an interview with only Borat himself. SBC is a very funny person and his dry (but piercing) humor was terrific to listen to while getting much more info about his film than if done in character. This interview alone did more to persuade me to see the movie than all the clips and hype have done. At this point, it is too late to do anything but damage control since the film opens today. I would hate to think that such a potentially funny film would get blown out by Tim Allen's re-re-redux but I can't agree more that it is inevitable.
Reply
11-06-2006 @ 12:45PM
the chimpanzee said...
This is somewhat naïve, I think. Every major celebrity has canned, studio/PR hack-approved answers to questions commonly asked by interviewers. They can prepare these answers because, as a rule, they are asked the same questions over and over again, and they aren't difficult to predict. While it is unusual to require that you submit the questions in advance, as an entertainment reporter, your ultimate goal is to write a good, readable story, and what better way to do that than to have one of the world's funniest people prepare material JUST FOR YOU, unique to your questions? Cohen is doing everyone a favor by appearing in character: viewers/readers get to see a performance instead of yet another rote "I had a great time making this film" back-and-forth, and the interviewer gets to be part of the show, acting as straight man opposite the funniest character in the funniest film of the year.
Of course, the movie just became the highest-grossing #1 movie in under 1,000 theatres, so the point is moot. Cohen did the right thing and Fox did not--there's no other way to look at it. Had Fox stuck with their original theatre count, they may have been looking at a $50+ mil opening. As it is, Borat was clearly the hottest ticket of the weekend, and has cemented Cohen's bankability.
Reply
11-11-2006 @ 10:02PM
anton said...
What about if there will be another documentary with Borat, but as world traveler(in Travel TV) or an international journalist who visit different countries?
That will be a nightmare for every government and people of every country, where is enough unglyness to show.Misery and Hypocrisy exist everywhere; not just in North America or South Russia. So let's have more Borats in the future and let's everyone laugh with everyone.
Reply