Which Bond is the Best Bond?
Filed under: Action, Classics, Casting, MGM, Fandom, DIY/Filmmaking, James Bond, Seven Days of 007

With the new James Bond film Casino Royale rushing toward us at turbo speed (it opens on November 17 in the States), Cinematical tackles the question: Which Bond is the Best?
Most people have their stock answers ready to go for this one. It's either a quick, "Roger Moore" or "Sean Connery." Does anyone actually pick George Lazenby? I always end up feeling sorry for him. He went from hunk-of-the-moment in a chocolate bar commercial to potentially being one of the biggest stars on the planet. But would you want to follow in Sean Connery's shoes? Go rent On Her Majesty's Secret Service if you haven't seen it, it's worth a look. Plus it's the only James Bond film with a metareference. In the opening scene, Lazenby saves a woman from drowning and she slaps him before running away. He looks directly at the camera and says, "This never happened to the other fellow." Ouch. So, by default in our books, after only being in one film and forced to try to follow up the original, he's out of the running for best Bond. That leaves us with Connery, Moore, Dalton and Brosnan ...
Which brings us to Roger Moore, who brought a much lighter wit and sense of humor to the Bond films. He had many quips and comebacks, and turned everything said to him into sexual innuendo more than Connery ever did. Moore always seemed like he was about to crack a smile, even while being inches away from death. He had been approached to play Bond after Connery while he was still doing the television show The Saint, but couldn't leave his contract. It might be blasphemy to some, but I always liked him better in that show than I did as Bond. That is, except when I was around ten years-old, then he was the coolest guy on the planet. If you'd asked me this question around the time Moonraker was out, we would've gone on and on about how cool Roger Moore was in outer space. Just as an FYI, Moonraker doesn't really hold up that well, at least for me. I mean, James Bond in zero gravity with lasers? At least Jaws was in it.
Then came Timothy Dalton, who had also been approached to play Bond after Connery, but felt that he was too young at the time. He went on to accept the role after Roger Moore stepped down, and his turn as the superspy in The Living Daylights (remember the title song from that movie by A-Ha?) grossed more than the previous two Moore bond films, and even beat Die Hard and Lethal Weapon at the box office. Not a bad debut. However, his second film Licence to Kill tanked miserably when it was released in 1989, and was only the second Bond film to fail at the box office after On Her Majesty's Secret Service. To me, Dalton always seemed like he had just woken up from a long nap, or that he needed one. Where Moore was too laid back, Dalton was too over the top. He did a better job as the smarmy villain in Disney's The Rocketeer. I think the problem for me was that he'll always be Prince Barin in Flash Gordon, and not the next James Bond.
Then came Pierce Brosnan, who had also been asked to play Bond before, but he was also tied to a television series, starring in Remington Steele at the time. After the Licence to Kill debacle, Bond vanished from the silver screen for six years. Brosnan came into the role in 1995 with GoldenEye, and there was no doubt that Bond was back. Brosnan's films remain some of the highest grossing in the series, and Die Another Day is the highest grossing Bond film ever. Brosnan did a great job of channeling both Connery and Moore, making his superspy both mirthful and cocky. Brosnan also had the added bonus of spectacular visual effects, with each film having to top the previous one in terms of sheer scale and amount of things blown up. Brosnan makes the grade as the second-best Bond, although you have to be very forgiving of the fact that he starred with Denise Richards in The World is Not Enough. Extremely forgiving. In fact, rush to Netflix or your favorite video store and rent Brosnan's great film The Matador to wash that taste out of your mouth.
Brosnan played Bond in four very successful films, and was interested in appearing in a fifth, but he eventually departed the role and there were rumors that everyone from Orlando Bloom to Hugh Jackman were going to take over the role, but it eventually ended up going to Daniel Craig. Craig, who was great in Layer Cake, is virtually unknown as a leading actor to most American audiences and wasn't met with open arms immediately; he even spurred some fans to boycott the film. Early reports are favorable, but you're going to have to decide for yourself. If you've seen the trailer, then you know that the film revolves around Bond before he became a 00-agent, meaning he has to have two kills on his record in order to get that famous three digit number. He's much more emotionally vulnerable and not reliant on all the fancy gadgets you've come to expect. He definitely seems like the most "I'm gonna make you cry" Bond we've ever seen on the screen. The action sequences look fantastic, but his whole "You've stripped me of my armor" line makes me throw up a tiny bit in my mouth every time I hear it.
However, none of these guys are Sean Connery. How can you be better than this guy? Even today, Connery just oozes James Bond appeal. He combined just the right amount of suave, arrogance, emotion and sex appeal. Plus he laid down what people just came to expect in a James Bond film; a guy who gets the woman, defies death, saves the world and doesn't break a sweat while doing it. When guys put on a white dinner jacket with black slacks and shoots the cuffs, they're secretly thinking "I am totally Sean Connery right now." He'll walk into a room as Bond with his half-closed eyes, and you'll find yourself wondering how you can pull that off the way he does. They made the mold with him, and everyone who has followed in the role has, whether they've said it in interviews or not, tried to copy him. He is James Bond, baby, and will always be the best.








Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
11-07-2006 @ 3:36PM
lp said...
Brosnan = invisible car!
'nuff said.
Connery
Dalton
Moore
Brosnan
I reckon Daniel Craig might just edge above Roger Moore if the trailers are owt to go by & they manage to pull off a decent sequel
Reply
11-07-2006 @ 3:44PM
chris ullrich said...
kevin, you are 100% right. couldn't have said it better myself. connery is and always will be james bond. end of story.
Reply
11-07-2006 @ 3:48PM
Martha Fischer said...
Totally Dalton -- I dig the dark, less posh, less flirty Bond. Plus, he could actually, act which is a nice bonus. Based on the footage we've seen so far, I'm thinking/hoping Craig will be in a similar mode.
Reply
11-07-2006 @ 3:55PM
chuck said...
connery sucked as bond. hell, he is just a crappy actor. i love moore best. second is brosnan. craig bears a face of a plumber - he's no bond.
Reply
11-07-2006 @ 4:01PM
Beeslo said...
Man...I hated Roger Moore's bond. He made him a complete goof. And Dalton could have been a better Bond villian. My two favs are the classic Connery and the modernly suave Brosnan. While I was sad to see Pierce go, I was excited to see Craig get the role. He's going to bring a deeply disturbing a violent side to Bond that no one has seen. After seeing Layer Cake two years ago, I knew this guy was meant for the role. Gonna be there front and center and laugh at all of those that called him a pussy all this time.
Reply
11-07-2006 @ 4:22PM
ferley said...
My bond picks are....
1 Pierce Brosnan- goldeneye, and die another day even with halle berry
2 George Lazenby- wish he had another chance but people back then did not understand change.
3 Sean Connery- the original
4 Timothy Dalton- Cocaine and crooked priest.
I hope Daniel Craig becomes the best bond ever, but we will have to see.
Reply
11-07-2006 @ 4:24PM
Jason Blosser said...
I always liked Lazenby, in part because the movie was more believable than these huge underground rocket cities run by the bad guys. I mean, c'mon. How did they bild one of these inside of a volcano without someone noticing. His acting was good and his departure premature. Also like Dalton.
Reply
11-07-2006 @ 4:51PM
Jeremy said...
Connery would be my pic he made Bond what he is today.
Bronsnan close behind, I am hoping Craig does a good job and changes the way we look at Bond
Reply
11-07-2006 @ 5:04PM
jordan said...
Lazenby was up there, but he still isn't Connery
here's my list:
Sean Connery
Pierce Brosnan
George Lazenby
Timothy Dalton
Roger Moore (ugh.)
and last but not least Daniel Craig, whom I know nothing about except for he did rather well in layer cake (l4yer cak3?)
Reply
11-07-2006 @ 5:24PM
Jonathan Farley said...
#1 Sean Connery - the classic Bond
#2 Pierce Brosnan - the modern Bond
#3 Daniel Craig - the earthy Bond
#4 Roger Moore - the campy Bond
#5 David Niven - the funny Bond
#6 George Lazenby - the 'who is that?' Bond
I never liked Moore too much,plus he was too beefy as he got older. Bond needs a killer edge underneath the polish and Connery pulls it off the best, hands down.
Reply
11-07-2006 @ 7:51PM
Cath said...
Here's my list:
1. Dalton
2. Connery
3. Craig (provisionally)
4. Moore
5. Niven
6. Lazenby
As you can tell, I prefer them dark and realistic. Connery only suffers because his films reflect the sexism of the times overmuch.
You'll note Brosnan's not on that list. He's now dead to me after what he did to that character. He's also been a total jerk, judging from his childish public behavior.
Reply
11-07-2006 @ 8:23PM
Chris said...
Well, I'll play devil's advocate here:
There are those who WILL claim Lazenby is the best Bond, and that On Her Majesty's is the best movie. Based purely on the opinion that they're the most true to Ian Fleming's characters and story. Bond was written as colder, with his charm being superficial and a tool to advance his missions.
So, while Connery, Brosnan, Moore and Dalton may have been better characters, they might not have been better Bonds... technically speaking.
And what about all the Bonds from the original Casino Royale? Peter Sellers, David Niven, Woody Allen... :)
Personally, I'll abstain from voting.
Reply
11-07-2006 @ 10:56PM
Earl Cobb said...
There is now question, the best is Connery. He had the attitude and the the character to pull off the role from the books. My second would have to be Brosnan. Timothy Dalton was the worst let down of all.
Reply
11-07-2006 @ 11:11PM
Zeta said...
Sean Connery is the best, with Roger Moore a close second. But I think that Daniel Craig will give them a good run for their money.
Reply
11-08-2006 @ 12:16AM
Ivan Minic said...
Connery - Brosnan - Moore
Reply
11-08-2006 @ 12:45AM
Nick James said...
JIMMY BOND FTW!
Reply
11-08-2006 @ 1:16AM
Duncan said...
It's hard with Lazenby because there was just the one movie, and I think had we seen more of him, he could quite easily have been the best Bond of all time. But simple choice otherwise: Sean Connery.
Roger Moore was a bit of a buffon, but he wasn't to bad, David Niven was good, Timothy Dalton nearly killed Bond, terrible Bond Movies, he just didn't have the touch. Since then we've got Brosnan, who was at least better than Dalton, closer to the original
movies, and David Craig...is he worthy of comment?
Order:
Connery
Niven
Lazenby
Brosnan
Moore
Dalton
Craig
Reply
11-08-2006 @ 1:28AM
Geoffrey Miguel said...
Connery has to be the best.....best bond character to mock.....As for gaining the most STDs close tie between Roger Moore and Pierce Brosman
Reply
11-08-2006 @ 1:30AM
Alex Billington said...
No one gives enough respect to Moore! He is the best! I mean look at all the ones he did, they're the best Bond films EVER: Live & Let Die, Man With The Golden Gun, Spy Who Loved Me, Moonraker, For Your Eyes Only, Octopussy, and A View to a Kill...!!
And I also love On Her Majesty's Secret Service more than nearly every other Bond, so in turn I also appreciate Lazenby quite a bit.
Reply
11-08-2006 @ 2:14AM
Beeslo said...
Moonraker and Octopussy the best Bond films ever??? What about Goldfinger? Or From Russia with Love? Thunderball? Diamonds Are Forever? Please...the are the classic and best Bond films and they are all done by the original. Moore's movie were ridiculously trite and never had any level of seriousness...Austin Powers and Flint delivered more serious moments than that doofus. I'll also add GoldenEye because Campbell is a genius and he is one of the main reasons, I know the new Bond film will be terrific. He brings in a sense of realism to his films without sacrificing the charm...I mean, come on...did anyone see the last Bond film...a fortress of ice? Driving through it while its melting? Wha? Wha? What?
And while I haven't placed Craig anywhere on the list, its because the movie is not out. So all you nitwits putting him at the bottom of your list just cause you don't like the idea of him, you all better just simmer down and judge him fairly after you come out of the theater. I mean...come on. Many said geeks were trashing Hugh Jackman when he got cast for Wolverine and the same for Tobey with Spider-man (comic book movies rock) and now look where they are. So give the guy at least a decent chance. Reports from the British premiere is that it might be better than you think...or possibly, dare I say it? One of the best Bond films in a long time.
Nov. 17 can't get here quick enough.
Reply