Lanter Knows the Code for War Games Sequel
Filed under: Drama, Thrillers, Casting, Newsstand, Remakes and Sequels
This comes directly from the "WTF?" department (yes, we have one of those here at Cinematical). After I just got finished waxing nostalgic about the original War Games, word comes that the long-discussed sequel to the 1983 film is now going to me made for sure. For a long time, there were just rumors and some bits of info. Then, a script was written and a director attached. Next, there were a couple of title changes and a few other pieces of news that seemed to indicate the film would happen for sure. But then, not a word. During that time, I always held out hope that because of all the various machinations, and the fact that they never announced any cast, the film would eventually go away -- never to be heard from again.Much to my disappointment, that doesn't appear to be the case because according to Production Weekly, War Games 2: The Dead Code now has a leading man -- Matt Lanter, of the TV show Heroes. To recap for those (like me) too stunned and disappointed to remember: Stuart Gillard will be directing the War Games sequel, from a script by Randall M. Badat, about a computer hacker (played by Lanter) who goes online to play a terrorist-attack simulation game against a government super-computer named Ripley (Ripley? Is nothing sacred?). Of course, once he starts playing the game he realizes he's way over his head because Riply is actually a paranoid artificially intelligent machine bent on saving the human race by imprisoning it. The hacker must then race against time to stop the super-computer and save humanity before it's too late.
So, let's get this straight: The sequel to one of the watershed films of the '80s is being directed by a guy who's biggest feature film credits are Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles III and Rocket Man? Being written by a guy who's only feature film credits are Hear No Evil and Surf II and will star a guy that almost no one has ever heard of (I watch Heroes but even I couldn't pick Lanter out of a lineup)? Plus, the story sounds like something concocted after a weekend binge with a bottle of Tequila while watching Fox News Channel. Wow, this sounds like a movie that just has to be made.
Can you sense my extreme sarcasm here? I bet you can. I'm sure Gillard, Badat and Lanter are probably nice guys who were looking for a job, but I just have to say to them -- look elsewhere. This huge mistake begins shooting on November 20 in Montreal -- with arrival at your local Blockbuster soon afterward. Is anyone really interested in wasting 90 minutes of their lives on seeing this movie?










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-09-2006 @ 1:15PM
RP said...
Well at least it isn't a remake, i guess.
Although the only thing preventing it from being is a single digit.
Reply
11-09-2006 @ 1:55PM
Obvious said...
Message to the people behind this travesty: FAIL.
Reply
11-09-2006 @ 2:11PM
b0ring said...
Didn't "I, Robot" do the whole "...saving the human race by imprisoning it." thing already? Only this won't be action-packed but a "Would you like to hack the Pentagon? Yes/No" Windows pop-up version.
All they need to do now is green-light another Goonies and may the bastardization of my childhood continue.
Reply
11-09-2006 @ 4:25PM
Jason said...
How is it that Tron 2 got axed and morphed into an abyssmal video game and this POS gets through?
Reply
11-10-2006 @ 12:28PM
ThePete said...
Now, how is this NOT a remake?
Also: why even bother with the name "War Games" if there won't be a real connection to the original? It's a different war game simulator computer and no mention of Broderick's character, either.
Seems like a lame ripoff that is lucky enough to get the rights to use the name of the movie it's ripping off. Though, b0ring got it right with the comparison to iRobot (not that said movie was the first scifi story to approach the computer that thinks it's smarter than humans approach).
Reply
11-09-2006 @ 7:46PM
Rich Drees said...
I liked this movie a whole lot more when it was called THE FORBIN PROJECT...
Reply