Cinematical

Neither of these actors are film stars per se, but both Jason Bateman and Nathan Fillian are excellent actors that seemingly can't catch a break on superb shows. Bateman for The Jake Effect and Arrested Development, Firefly for Fillian.

Reply

It's "fewer," as in, "...the actress has no fewer than six projects currently in the works." It's sad that a person who purports to be a professional writer doesn't know even the basics of grammar.

Reply

i think scarlett is doing what she loves to do. i've seen two or three movies with scarlett in it and i've liked her acting. i'm extremely biased though cause my goal is to meet scarlett. i understand what you mean though. keanu reeves is also criticized for having little to no skill and still he is in big movies. i think it's an opinion and Queenan is one person so...yeah.

Reply

Thanks, Keith, for your correction; the grammatical error has been corrected. As always, we appreciate our readers who take the time to graciously point out when we've made a mistake.

Reply

Are people just realising that Scarlett ain't much of an actress? her line delivery is so awful, it is almost as if she expects the dialogue to catch up with the action or reaction she is giving. Just because she had Lost in Translation and Girl with a Pearl earring do well doesn't mean she is one of the top actresses. Her problem isn't simply BO, her performances also leave ALOT to be desired, the fact that she is 20 years old and dresses like she is 35 doesn't help either. The tabs blab on about her bringing back "old school glamour", well, she sure brings back the old and glamour part of it!

Reply

Wotcha

I think the reason she gets so much work is the same reason Keanu Reeves does - they're both so bland and uncharismatic that any director/studio has to feel that they can paint onto them whatever character they want to without the actors personality getting in the way. They're also (arguably) good-looking wool so they're not going to particularly offend anyone either.

Like it or not, casting - like moviemaking generally - is mostly about marketing/demographics and she fulfills the criteria for a modern leading lady quite well. Kinda good-looking, kinda dumb-sounding and kinda young.

Reply

I have seen Scarlett in a fair few films at this stage. I am in the sizable minority including John Hurt who cant stand Lost in translation, Scarlett Johannson's shapely posterior aside. I think her main problem has been her inablity to act her age. even though she is very young she refuses to play young roles. She plays roles which for mature actresses. There is something cold about her I find. She was wise to escape the clutches of Tom Cruise and i will give her bonus points for that.

Reply

I think Scarlett Johansson is beautiful. I do not think she is a stellar actress, though, in any way. I,too, have noticed her lack of facial expressions and voice inflections, which mute her characters and come across as bland.

At least she's pretty, or I think she'd be out.

Reply

Scarlett just annoys me, but I have to say I loved her in the Island. That's a film that doesn't get enough attention. Usually I'll avoid a movie by her.

Reply

I would love to disagree with this article as I adore Scarlett (but for 'less than honorable' reasons). Alas, I have reached my tether with her. She's just not a great actress, at least not yet. As far as filling a marketing criterion, she's one of the hottest, and seemingly, one of the most well adjusted young actresses out there, but if she's not putting butts in seats at the cinema... what's the point? I think she'll improve though (maybe she 'should' take a couple of roles where she's acting her age). Till then, I'll satisfy my need to ogle her by just googling her images. Mmmmm....

Reply

Cannot state enough how much I hate Scarlett. Cannot stand her.

The Island was good, but that was more for Ewan.

Reply

Is it any coincidence that Nicholas Cage starred in a movie entitled Kiss of Death? I think not.

Reply

I agree with Queenan that Johansson was "entirely extraneous" in The Prestige. So much so that she disappeared with no explanation.

Reply

Thank you Joe!

Finally someone that agrees with me - I've been saying the same thing for years...

I don't see that she has any 'acting' ability whatsoever, and whenever I've seen her in a movie she seems blank, bland and uninteresting.

I've yet to see her act at all.

Reply

I think scarlett is a good actress, especially among the young crowd of current actresses (Lindsay, Hillary, etc.) I rather enjoy her films.

Reply

I think the lot of you are way off base. Scarlett's role choices may not bank at the box office, but I credit that to the lack of intellect in the general movie going audience. In Girl with the Pearl Earring, the chemistry between her and Colin Firth is palapable. The scene with Colin pearcing her ear is so erotic without anything sexual actually taking place. I believe that she chooses roles that she can get behind, not the roles that will break the box office. Getting big money doesn't mean much at the box office anymore. All it seems to mean is that a lot of sheeple came out to see your film. Big Deal. I'll watch Scarlett polish bowling balls before I see some of the other flotsam that's floating through megaplexes these days.

Reply

Joe Queenan is fun to read, but he's made a career of basically slamming people. Queenan should be read for entertainment value. Some of his comments are insightful, but he's a hatchet man, looking for reasons to be caustic. That's fine, but you've got to take Queenan with a grain of salt. To take him at his word and say "Oh, Scarlett is the kiss of death" is a bit silly. She's good in some roles, not so much in others.

Reply

I happen to like Scarlett, and just for future reference, it's REPERTOIRE. Articles that are THAT far off just aren't even worth reading.

Reply