Paul Schrader's Film Canon
Filed under: Lists

It has been on newsstands for a month or so already, but it has taken me awhile to ponder Paul Schrader's new article that tries to define a film canon (titled "Canon Fodder") in the September/October issue of Film Comment magazine. The editorial page brags that it's the longest article ever published by the magazine (except a 1973 two-issue essay on King Vidor). In it, former film critic, and current screenwriter and director Schrader was challenged to create the movie equivalent of Harold Bloom's The Western Canon. He began writing a book, but eventually stopped short with this long article. His reasoning is not optimistic; he claims that cinema, and especially the idea of finding aesthetic art therein, is mostly dead, a relic of the 20th century. He calls cinema a "broken down horse" and says that, if he were just starting out today, he would not turn to films for personal expression.
Nevertheless, he chooses 60 films for his canon, and I take exception with only a couple of them (All That Jazz and A Place in the Sun, if you must know). If those of us who still have hope for the form ignore the tone of the article, there is much joy and greatness to be found below. Currently, readers have responded exclusively online with their list of the most important, omitted directors, and Schrader responds to the readers (and, yes, the omission of Rossellini was an error).
Gold
1. The Rules of the Game (1939, Jean Renoir)
2. Tokyo Story (1953, Yasujiro Ozu)
3. City Lights (1931, Charles Chaplin)
4. Pickpocket (1959, Robert Bresson)
5. Metropolis (1927, Fritz Lang)
6. Citizen Kane (1941, Orson Welles)
7. Orphée (1950, Jean Cocteau)
8. Masculin-Feminin (1966, Jean-Luc Godard)
9. Persona (1966, Ingmar Bergman)
10. Vertigo (1958, Alfred Hitchcock)
11. Sunrise (1927, F.W. Murnau)
12. The Searchers (1956, John Ford)
13. The Lady Eve (1941, Preston Sturges)
14. The Conformist (1970, Bernardo Bertolucci)
15. 8 ½ (1963, Federico Fellini)
16. The Godfather (1972, Francis Ford Coppola)
17. In the Mood for Love (2000, Wong Kar-wai)
18. The Third Man (1949, Carol Reed)
19. Performance (1970, Donald Cammell/Nicholas Roeg)
20. La Notte (1961, Michelangelo Antonioni)Silver
21. Mother and Son (1997, Alexander Sokurov)
22. The Leopard (1963, Luchino Visconti)
23. The Dead (1987, John Huston)
24. 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968, Stanley Kubrick)
25. Last Year at Marienbad (1961, Alain Resnais)
26. The Passion of Joan of Arc (1928, Carl Theodor Dreyer)
27. Jules and Jim (1961, Francois Truffaut)
28. The Wild Bunch (1969, Sam Peckinpah)
29. All That Jazz (1979, Bob Fosse)
30. The Life of Oharu (1952, Kenji Mizoguchi)
31. High and Low (1963, Akira Kurosawa)
32. Sweet Smell of Success (1957, Alexander Mackendrick)
33. That Obscure Object of Desire (1977, Luis Bunuel)
34. An American in Paris (1951, Vincente Minnelli)
35. The Battle of Algiers (1966, Gillo Pontecorvo)
36. Taxi Driver (1976, Martin Scorsese)
37. Ali: Fear Eats the Soul (1974, Rainer Werner Fassbinder)
38. Blue Velvet (1986, David Lynch)
39. Crimes and Misdemeanors (1989, Woody Allen)
40. The Big Lebowski (1998, Joel Coen)
Bronze
41. The Red Shoes (1948, Michael Powell/Emeric Pressburger)
42. Singin' in the Rain (1952, Stanley Donen)
43. Chinatown (1974, Roman Polanski)
44. The Crowd (1928, King Vidor)
45. Sunset Boulevard (1950, Billy Wilder)
46. Talk to Her (2002, Pedro Almodovar)
47. Shanghai Express (1932, Josef von Sternberg)
48. Letter from an Unknown Woman (1948, Max Ophuls)
49. Once Upon a Time in the West (1969, Sergio Leone)
50. Salvatore Giuliano (1962, Francesco Rosi)
51. Nostalghia (1983, Andrei Tarkovsky)
52. Seven Men from Now (1956, Budd Boetticher)
53. Claire's Knee (1970, Eric Rohmer)
54. Earth (1930, Alexander Dovzhenko)
55. Gun Crazy (1949, Joseph H. Lewis)
56. Out of the Past (1947, Jacques Tourneur)
57. Children of Paradise (1945, Marcel Carne)
58. The Naked Spur (1953, Anthony Mann)
59. A Place in the Sun (1951, George Stevens)
60. The General (1927, Buster Keaton)
I've seen 55 of the 60, so I have a little more work to do...










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-14-2006 @ 11:35AM
Dan said...
I understand and respect snobbery, but making a canon, but excluding Spielberg entirely is such a total waste of time. The canon should include texts without which the study of the field would make no sense. If you based your knowledge of '80s and '90s cinema on freakin' John Huston's The Dead (as lifeless and insufferable a piece of breathless cinema as I could name), you'd probably be as relevant to modern cinema as, well, Paul Schrader. Stick either Jaws or E.T. on the list and be done with it. Acknowledge the guy's centrality to any discussion of the past 20 years of cinema while also admitting his potentially negative influence. But don't think you're better than admitting that Spielberg is a major cinematic craftsman...
-Daniel
Reply
11-14-2006 @ 1:11PM
fearlessweaver said...
As an English major, I spent a lot of my academic career trying to escape or destroy the literary cannon. There's no need to force that kind of cultural hegemony onto film. Now that technology makes film increasingly easier to create and share, we are living in a democratic, egalitarian, and creative time for film.
Film as an art isn't dead, but it is nearly impossible for either the marketplace or elitist institutions to dictate what is "worthy." To me, this development seems like a very good thing.
Reply
11-16-2006 @ 2:07PM
Tim Bower said...
Dull, predictable, doctrinaire.
I tend to agree that cinema is a 20th-century art form that is past its sell-by date (probably the only thing Paul Schrader and Peter Greenaway have in common); so let's try and select some films that are cinematic-in-themselves, which seems to me to have been the point of the Politique des Auteurs.
SOme randon comments:
Will someone agree with me that 'Citizen Kane' is superficial flash? As vacuous and empty as the title character? If you're going to leave out Spielberg, you should leave out Welles (or at least replace it with 'Touch of Evil').
'Tabu'? IMHO better than 'Sunrise', but officially co-directed with Flaherty, so does that disqualify it?
What about directors who only made one film? Laughton's 'Night of the Hunter' should be in there, shouldn't it?
Nice to see 'Performance' in there, tho'!
The irony is of course that one sure way of contributing to the death of an art form is to stick it in amber, so to speak. Make it a museum piece, consign it to history, establish a canon, why not? Schrader isn't guilty: I'll point my finger at the Sarrises and the Kaels!
Reply
12-03-2006 @ 7:20PM
Curt Zacharias said...
Werner effing Herzog!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply
2-01-2007 @ 10:03PM
malfred said...
Take care not to just argue with the list...read the article and many of these very concerns are raised. Schrader makes a point of saying that he's including the canonical lists at the end simply because people will otherwise wonder, and that he put in only one film per director (& in many cases another would do just as well), and that the exercise is by its very nature one in elitism.
Reply