Name Your Baby After a Movie Character
Filed under: Celebrities and Controversy, Fandom, Tom Cruise, Peter Jackson, Harry Potter, Lists
We like to give celebrities a lot of crap about their baby naming practices. Of course, names like Apple and Suri and Banjo and Rumor and Moon Unit seem ridiculous to most of us normal folk who prefer common names like Michael and Elizabeth, but a lot of non-celebrities are just as guilty with their name choices. I'm talking about movie fans and other celebrity-obsessed parents. A recent survey in the UK has revealed a lot of interesting names given to newborns, including Gandalf, Superman and Harry Potter. None of these are exactly movie-related, and they could be the result of fans of literature or comic books, but I'm willing to bet they have more to do with the recent film versions of the works in which these characters appear. Other baby names that should lead to future torment include Addidas, Reebok, Tiger, Snoop, Gazza, Arsenal and Apple (after Gwyneth Paltrow's daughter). Some popular names associated with famous people, though less likely to garner ridicule, are Madonna, Kylie, David Beckham, Peaches, Keanu and Britney. This isn't that strange, though. Many of the people I know were named after someone famous, whether an actor, musician or writer.
I have to admit honestly that I can relate to parents wanting to reflect their fandom at the expense of their poor children. For most of my life, I claimed that I would name my first son Atticus. Then, Bruce Willis and Demi Moore had to name their daughter Scout, and I didn't want to seem like a copycat. The final blow to my idea, however, came when I heard that Atticus was the name of one of Jake Gyllenhaal's dogs (the other is named Boo).









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-18-2006 @ 9:10AM
EO said...
Why shouldn't people name their kids after movie characters? People name their kids after fictional characters from that moldy old collection of fairy tales known as the Bible, so what's the difference?
Reply
11-18-2006 @ 11:25AM
Ferd Philbie said...
Did the popular girl's name "Madison" originate from a movie character as well? It's one of the most popular names out there now, but I don't recall ever hearing it before the movie SPLASH, when Daryl Hannah's mermaid character names herself that upon seeing a street sign for "Madison Avenue". The Tom Hanks character then makes a joke out of how odd a name it is for a girl. Just wondering. If it's true, then it's an old example of an odd movie character's name becoming mainstream.
Reply
11-19-2006 @ 8:04AM
Reese said...
Fred, I remember that, too. I think there was about a 20 year delay there, but I suspect the movie "Splash" was the genesis of that newly popular name.
Reply
12-14-2006 @ 9:43PM
Martha Fischer said...
Dude, Gazza won't be tormented, the kid's named after the last great English soccer player!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Gascoigne
Reply
12-15-2006 @ 11:09AM
Johanna said...
I agree, why not name kids after characters from movies/literature? I have a son with a very common, "normal" name, which I like. However, if I have another, I plan to name him Eragon (from the book, as I have yet to see the movie). What matters is the sentiment behind it. Furthermore, how does anyone know that a name that may be considered unusual now won't be common in about 20 years? I have a sister who was given the name Olivia 25 years ago, before it was popular. Now, you hear it every 5 minutes.
Reply