Follow the Yellow Brick Road ... to TV?
Filed under: Classics, Drama, Music & Musicals, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Deals, Newsstand, Remakes and Sequels
I'll admit right up front that I'm a sucker for The Wizard of Oz. Well, maybe "sucker" isn't the right word because that sounds negative. Ok, let's go with "fan." Yeah, that's better. Anyway, The Wizard of Oz is a classic film for the ages. It's a great story, complete with fantastic worlds, terrific characters, fun songs and even one or two important lessons learned along the way. Through the years, I've watched the movie over and over, enjoying it each and every time, secure in the knowledge (for the most part) that there weren't too many attempts at sequels or, worse yet, reimaginings to ruin the experience. Of course, there have been a few attempts -- most notably the "official" animated sequel Journey Back to Oz , the much darker Return to Oz featuring Nicol Williamson and Fairuza Balk as Dorothy and the ill-conceived urban musical The Wiz. But for the most part, these attempts were few and far between, have been met with minimal success and can pretty much be forgotten. But now, for some reason, it seems the Sci-Fi Channel is trying to get into the act with its own version of the classic story -- and yes, they've even used the dreaded word "reimagining" to describe their show. According to Sci-Fi Wire, the channel has given a green light to a mini-series called Tin Man, exec. produced by Robert Halmi Sr. and Jr. and described in the article as "a wild Sci-Fi reimagining of The Wizard of Oz." Mmmm, yeah.
The plot of this version, written by Steven Long Mitchell and Craig Van Sickle, tells the story of a young woman named D.G. who is plucked from her boring life and transported to The Outer Zone (aka the O.Z.), a fantastic realm oppressed by dark magic. Once there, she must take a perilous journey along the fabled Old Road to a wizard known as the Mystic Man. Along the way, she's joined by Glitch, a man missing half his brain, Raw, a quiet but powerful wolverine-like creature who's lost his courage and Cain, a former policeman known as Tin Man who seeks revenge for his damaged heart. Ultimately, D.G.'s journey will lead her to an ultimate showdown with an evil sorceress called Azkadellia, whose ties to D.G. go deeper than anyone realizes.
This is the part where I say how much I think this thing is going to suck and how disappointed I am that anyone would even attempt to make this. In the world where I run the studios and control everything, this kind of thing would never happen. You just shouldn't mess with a classic like The Wizard of Oz. Period. Unfortunately, that's not the world we live in and instead, we're going to be subjected to this travesty. My only consolation is that this show will ultimately blow and then fade away into oblivion where it belongs. However, if you, for some reason, have any interest in this project, production is slated to begin in early 2007 in Vancouver (where else?) with an eye toward a December 2007 premiere. I don't know about you, but this is not something I want for Christmas.









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-27-2006 @ 2:21AM
Chris said...
It could be far, far worse. At least they're making it different enough that it will never be confused with the original, nor the book. A sci-fi world with lame initials and allusions is a far cry from the original setting. Imagine if they'd redone it in the same time period and style?
Reply
11-27-2006 @ 10:47AM
This is Me said...
Sounds like someone's read WICKED and is trying to do a side-rip of it. WICKED was a great read; worth the time to any WIZARD OF OZ fan. A bit dark, it gives some great depth to the characters -- a good re-imagining, if you will. Not meant as a sequel/prequel/etc, I think it stands on its own.
Reply
11-27-2006 @ 8:35PM
Michael said...
While I grant you that this particular attempt at reinvention sounds like it will be crap, I think it's pretty ridiculous to say that you should never ever mess with "classics." Perhaps studios should use better judgment when it comes to deciding which attempts to support, but that's very different from saying you should never do it. I mean, I'm sure there are plenty of successful reinventions that upset somebody. Take, for example, Wicked (the book and musical). It's a reinvention of the same "classic," and while it's not my cup of tea, plenty of people love it.
Reply
11-27-2006 @ 10:04PM
nOva said...
Whether it's good or bad, it cannot ruin the original. There are people that think the MGM movie was blasphemous to the original novel. In either case, a remake or a reimagining or a sequel cannot ruin the original because they cannot replace the original.
Reply