Review: Curse of the Golden Flower
Filed under: Action, Drama, Foreign Language, New Releases, Sony Classics, Theatrical Reviews, Cinematical Indie

In the course of Hollywood history, movie genres have grown from the the lower regions, among the ticket buyers and popcorn munchers, in the Saturday matinees and with the dime store, penny-a-word trash classics. The Western was the first of these, making its movie debut as early as the movies themselves, with The Great Train Robbery (1903). Not fifty years had gone by before some wise guy had the idea to take this ground-level idea and turn it into an impressive, blue-ribbon pageant, a noble, tasteful new object worthy of respect. These came in the form of High Noon (1952) and Shane (1953), praised through word of mouth, as Westerns for people who don't ordinarily like Westerns. Critics ate them up. And, if you'll notice, the Western genre is more or less gone.
The same thing happened to musicals. As soon as pictures learned to talk and all through the 1950s, musicals ruled, and plenty of great, small ones crooned and tapped their way across screens, much to the unfettered joy of fans. But in the 1960s, the graceless, inflated, gargantuan West Side Story (1961) -- a musical for people who don't ordinarily like musicals -- came along. And now the musical is more or less gone (and, I'm sorry, but Dreamgirls doesn't count).
Now, we're witnessing the death of the martial arts movie, and Zhang Yimou's Curse of the Golden Flower is one of the first -- and perhaps one of the last -- coffin nails. Martial arts movies first crossed over to the U.S. in the early 1970s with Bruce Lee. Like the Western and the musical, they appealed mainly to converted fans -- with their bad dubbing, noisy soundtracks and the fact that they only played in the seediest and most out-of-the-way theaters. The tradition continued throughout the 1990s, as fans sought badly transferred videos and DVDs, or turned up at revival houses to catch their favorite films. When something like Rumble in the Bronx (1996) came to theaters, it remained a present for fans, complete with its bad dubbing and laughable production values.
Ang Lee changed all that with Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (2000). It took the genre, slowed it down and decorated it with pretty baubles. Suddenly the mainstream media began getting excited about "the martial arts" film, as if, finally, there was a "good" one. Lee has moved on, but Zhang has contributed three more of these pageants to cinema history. I consider his Hero (made in 2002, released in 2004) the genuine article, since it had the good fortune to cast the formidable Jet Li in the lead role. When he moves, jumps, kicks or spins, you'd better believe it's for real. But House of Flying Daggers (2004) tried to accomplish the same thing with mere actors and failed miserably, although you'd never notice from reading the reviews; most critics lumped the two films together as twin masterworks. Zhang's Curse of the Golden Flower is even slower and more ridiculous. Frankly, not even Chow Yun-fat and Gong Li, two of the world's most impressive actors, can inject any dazzle into this dud.
Chow plays the Emperor, circa the tenth century, who arrives home just before the start of a big annual festival. All manner of intrigue abounds; the Emperor is slowly poisoning the Empress, and she is secretly sleeping with her stepson, Crown Prince Wan (Liu Ye). Wan is in love with Chan (Li Man), the daughter of the Imperial Doctor (Ni Dahong), who is in charge of slipping the poison to the Empress. The Emperor and the Empress have two sons of their own, Prince Jai (Jay Chou), who dotes on his mother, and the younger Prince Yu (Qin Junjie).
The festival is the turning point for everything; everyone has a secret plan that will unfurl. Instead, Zhang treats us to endless, soulless and completely un-thrilling battle sequences made up of faceless CGI figures hurling thousands of spears over a wall. Lots of people die, and lots of blood spills, but the minutes do not tick by any faster.
The main problem here is that Zhang is a staid director, best known for his use of colors, and more suited to still, quiet images than to action. Hero was divided up into neat, color-coded set pieces that worked beautifully, but Curse of the Golden Flower is confusing sludge. This problem is exacerbated by the fact that Curse of the Golden Flower is based on a play (by Cao Yu), and Zhang has decided to remain slavishly devoted to its pages rather than having a bit of fun. It's like a droning, extended Hamlet, when it could have had a bit of bounce.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-22-2006 @ 12:33PM
Mr. P said...
Aww man, a shame to hear that this one doesn't live up to Zhang's previous efforts, I've really enjoyed those, especially on the bigscreen. Quite epic. "Hero" really was amazing...probably still have to see this one at least once in the theater.
Reply
12-22-2006 @ 12:54PM
Rob Stevens said...
Too bad the movie isn't any good, but reading this review was worth it just for the screenshot above.
Reply
12-22-2006 @ 1:42PM
Lee said...
lol^
Reply
12-22-2006 @ 2:34PM
Cath said...
Interesting. I thought Hero, despite the inestimable Jet Li, sucked the mop and House of Flying Daggers an elegant romance/action/art film.
Reply
12-23-2006 @ 5:22AM
Leo said...
I just watched it and I loved it. Maybe we're just looking out for different things... this wasn't as much a "martial arts" film, but more of a chinese period drama.
If you want to just watch Kung Fu I'd recommend another movie. But for the great acting and plot twists I'd highly recommend this film.
Reply
12-23-2006 @ 3:12PM
Frank said...
Wow. Anyone who doesn't think that "House Of Flying Daggers" (far superior to "Hero") is absolutely wonderful is not someone I can listen to about whether I'll like "Curse". "Daggers" was pure delirious cinema and I loved every minute of it - operatic, romantic, and exhilarating. If this one has even half the magic, I'm so there. I would suggest that your definition of a martial arts film is just terribly outdated and that your connection to and understanding of the genre is dead, not the genre itself. If anything it's more open to possibilities than ever. "Fearless" is another one that transcends and changes the genre for the better. I think it will continue on just fine even if you don't "get" it. How pretentious can you be, Jeffrey?
Reply
12-24-2006 @ 1:35AM
gadlaw said...
It's a chinese period drama as mentioned by Leo. To label all Chinese movies as martial arts movies is, well, let's just say it's an uneducated generalization. It's like saying all Hollywood movies are westerns. I wouldn't even know where to begin to try to educate you but as a movie critic and a movie fan you would do well to explore and sample the various asian cinema offerings, romantic comedies, horror movies, historical drama and heroic mythological fairy tales and just every genre you're used to seeing in western cinema. Chinese, Korean, Japanese, even Thai and Phillippino movies are out there. You just gotta learn to love subtitles.
Reply
12-27-2006 @ 7:22PM
LastingMovie said...
The most expensive Asian Movie so far. It's a big box office hits in China. So far in US it's only open in 60 theater. The movie is good
Reply
12-28-2006 @ 11:24PM
COGFSucks said...
This movie is one big dysfunctional family chop suey. If Zhang intended to make a Kung Fu Scary Movie like film, then he certainly has succeeded, because the audience I watched it with couldn't help burst outlaughing through out the film.
Reply
12-30-2006 @ 9:49PM
Dan Springer said...
I just saw the film, and agree that it's not up to the previous standards of Zhang's other films. I liked all his other films, actually, but this one is just too slow moving, and it doesn't come together as a story like "Hero" or "House of Flying Daggers".
By now, you expect the plot twist at the end, and then the twist on the twist, but in this one, the ending seemed predictable to me. I don't want to give any more information about the particulars for people who haven't seen the film...
All his films are visually dazzling, and in different ways (different colors), and this one is no exception- except for the fact that he overdoes it a bit. There is so much color going on inside the palace that in some scenes, it becomes less asthetically pleasing and more overwhelming. There are a lot of rainbow-type color combinations going on which are not as pleasing as the remarkably subtle and extravagant color uses in "Hero" and especially "House of Flying Daggers".
I don't agree with the first reviewer that "Daggers" failed miserably- I think just the opposite- I think it was his most successful; I loved the fight scenes, the scenery, the color, the PACING, and the story.
Reply
1-03-2007 @ 10:23PM
haxa said...
this review is pure stereotyping of chinese films! the chinese don't just fight all the way through in their thousand of years of civilizations! there are lots of things to learn from zhang yimou's fictional interpretations on tang's dynasty.
i feel like watching an opera when i saw this movie yesterday. full of tragedy, betrayal, lust, sensibilities, incest, vulgarities in epic proportion.
by the way, this movie is dubbed in cantonese for malaysian audience.
Reply
1-05-2007 @ 2:03AM
Ina said...
As I woman, I like all the favor and sympathy devoted to the queen, and the revolters of the "harmonious" system that the king tries so hard to maintain. Right...it's like an epic opera. I just wish Yimou had given the queen more reason besides a bad relationship to coup.
Reply
1-29-2007 @ 4:19PM
Luo Yi said...
Zhang Yimou is an incredibly talented film maker. His early work is a testament to this fact. Films like Ju Dou (1990) and "Wo de fu qin mu qin" aka "The Road Home" (1999) give us a clear view of his remarkable ability to bring you into the moment of the film's stark reality. However, after seeing "Curse of the Golden Flower" last night, I was after it's conclusion somewhat confused.
It's lack of story flow and cohesiveness, fractured and behaviorally inconsistent characters, and seemingly "formula" construction with lavish cinematography concealing the inherent flaws in this picture, left me disappointed and angry. I felt somewhat betrayed, and feeling as if Zhang Yimou had yielded to the pressures that can be exerted by those with the money to finance these films.
Then suddenly, over my post-movie Cheesecake Factory Salad, an interesting hypothesis was born.
It occurred to me that perhaps, just maybe Zhang Yimou is purposely sabotaging his film. Perhaps he's locked into a contract to make a certain number of films for Sony Pictures, and he's unhappy with the arrangement. Maybe he's not getting the respect or creative control he needs to remain interested in the projects success, and has found a convenient way of protesting his dissatisfaction - by sending a message with his film. While enjoying my salad, I kept hearing the first and last words spoken in the film by Chow Yun Fat. I'll paraphrase; "...everything you have is because I've given it to you. Never will you have anything if you take it by force..." I can't help but wonder is this is a message to the financiers of the film, not to interfere with is his creative control over his work.
I suspect we'll see an entirely different kind of film come from Zhang Yimou next time around. One with the incredible passion, drama, and artistry that he's capable of. That is of course, if his contractual problems are resolved by then. Let's hope for the best! RW
Reply