Review Of M. Night's Rejected 'Green Effect' Script Pops Up Online
Filed under: Action, Drama, Thrillers, Mystery & Suspense, Scripts, Newsstand, Comic/Superhero/Geek
Over at Latino Review, they've posted a review of the much-circulated -- and much rejected -- script by The Sixth Sense director M. Night Shyamalan called The Green Effect. Sadly, the script recently went around Hollywood and nobody was interested -- which is something the author of the review just can't understand. At the site, the reviewer goes on and on about how fantastic the script is and how Night is getting the shaft in Hollywood after only one "flop" -- the less-than-stellar Lady in the Water.
In the piece, the reviewer also goes on to say that any studio executive who passed on the project should be fired because, among other things, Shyamalan's films have made billions and this script has a chance of doing the same. I kinda agree -- at least about the shafting part. It's a story probably as old as Hollywood itself. A writer/director has a huge success the first time he gets a chance and then spends the rest of his career trying to live up to that success. Shyamalan is a talented writer/director and I hope he won't follow in the footsteps of another very successful first-timer who never really "recovered" from his initial success -- the genius Orson Welles.
Welles was never really the same after Citizen Kane and spent the rest of his career trying to live up to it. Shyamalan, at least, has already had a few successful films under his belt. Heck, even Spielberg made one or two not-so-good movies -- just watch 1941 if you don't believe me. So, in spite of his recent downturn, I think Shyamalan has the talent and skills to bounce back. What do you guys think?
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-14-2007 @ 7:16PM
Jack Scalfani said...
M. Night's movies have all been weak. The only reason they made money was because of the after glow of sixth sense. He even admitted that the ending of sixth sense came to him after he had written the whole thing. Without the ending, that whole movie would have stunk. He is so worried about directing and starring in his movies that he is not writing very well.
Reply
2-14-2007 @ 7:21PM
Brian Neuls said...
I read the review...sounds like a pretty solid idea, told in pretty vivid detail...so if they did review the script, it seems pretty awesome...buuuttt...it's awfully close in spirit to the Stephen King book Cell. That's not bad, but coming so soon after that novel...really like the way the script plays out in the article, though, would really go for seeing Shyamalan make it...I don't agree with the idea he got shafted, though...if you read the book The Man Who Heard Voices, you may see...he burned some bridges and made other people think he wouldn't think twice to burn theirs...he really may have caused more bad blood than he could make up for...so, in my humble opinion, it may have nothing to do with the script itself...but the attitude of the man with the script. Just a thought...that I don't think Latino Review took into account. I know he mentioned it...but I don't think he gives it enough weight to explain why so many studios may have passed.
Reply
2-14-2007 @ 7:28PM
Stan Winsome said...
Maybe it's not the script it's that no one wants to work with Night anymore because he's such a prima donna?
Reply
2-14-2007 @ 7:28PM
Colin Boyd said...
Welles was a terrible businessman. What ruined his career was a falling out with John Houseman, his producer. Remember, Welles was 25 when he directed Kane, and even though he had a few great scripts, performances and even a couple of fantastic movies on down the line shot on a shoestring budget, the studios wouldn't go anywhere near him after The Lady from Shanghai, some five or six years after Kane. So he still got work for awhile, though nobody had much to show for it.
Somebody will buy Shyamalan's script. They might dictate that he can't direct it, which would be an interesting twist (and hopefully he can't act in it), but with all the Newmarkets and Lionsgates out there, somebody will give him a deal. They just don't want to pay Disney or Fox money for it.
Reply
2-14-2007 @ 7:50PM
Blockbuster said...
Are you seriously comparing M. Night Shyamalan to Orson Welles? By implication, you're comparing THE SIXTH SENSE to CITIZEN KANE?
Are you high?
Reply
2-14-2007 @ 8:49PM
brandon said...
It's pretty awful to compare M. Night to Welles.
The former is a hack who got lucky with having his first movie be so wildly successful. The latter was a genius who was cursed with having his first movie be so wildly successful.
See the difference
Reply
2-14-2007 @ 9:13PM
Rich Drees said...
Good lord, but I hate the script reviews at LR. I mean really, do we need this kind of dickwaving in review-
"Poor Elliot, Alma is going to leave him for another man. If he would have hit that correct, his wife wouldn’t be leaving him. You see, us Latin boys don’t have those issues with our women leaving us. My money says the JOEY character is a Latino who is hung like a water buffalo! LOL!"
Way to undercut your own credibility when trying to score an exclusive story...
Reply
2-14-2007 @ 9:13PM
Nick James said...
Comparing M. Night to Welles (who is from my hometown, rawk!) is awful. And what the hell's wrong with 1941?
Reply
2-14-2007 @ 10:47PM
Peter Nellhaus said...
Chris: "Sixth Sense" was actually Night's THIRD film, following "Praying with Anger" and "Wide Awake", two films that did not get wide distribution.
Orson Welles was not around to supervise the final edit of "Magnificent Amberson" because he was persuaded by Nelson Rockefeller, a major shareholder of RKO, to help the war effort by filming in South America. Welles' film "The Stranger" is the only one of his films to make a profit on initial release. Unfortunately, rumors repeated as facts hobbled Welles' career as a filmmaker.
Reply
2-14-2007 @ 10:49PM
chris ullrich said...
actually, i was comparing welles difficulties following citizen kane to night's current troubles, not the two men as filmmakers. welles is a genius who deserves as much praise as i can heap on him.
night, while very talented and not at all a "hack", is not anything close to welles as a filmmaker and i'm pretty sure i didn't say he was. and no, i'm not high blockbuster. are you?
Reply
2-14-2007 @ 11:50PM
GhaleonQ said...
As stated, Welles' and Shyamalan's situations are completely different.
Reply
2-15-2007 @ 1:02AM
Reed said...
you're right. citizen kane was terrible.
Reply
2-15-2007 @ 1:23PM
Kevin Archibald said...
Anyone who thinks Orson Welles never lived up to his turn in Citizen Cane obviously hasn't seen Transformers: The Movie.
Reply
2-15-2007 @ 2:40PM
Cath said...
Orson Welles doing his lesser films like F is for Fake stands head and shoulders above Shyamalan on his best day. The only halfway decent film Shyamalan did was Sixth Sense and that's all it was: halfway decent. (Had The Others preceded its release, Sixth Sense would have not been a box office hit at all.) The rest of his production has been total, unmitigated, self-involved, hollow crap.
Welles was screwed for any number of reasons, but you can't deny the genius in Magnificent Ambersons, Touch of Evil, Lady from Shanghai or The Trial. Even his appearances in Henry Jaglom's films are refreshingly wonderful: as Marlene Dietrich likened being around Welles as a plant being watered.
Reply
2-15-2007 @ 4:55PM
ThePete said...
I think M. Night is over-rated. Every time he has a movie SOMEone thinks it's the best movie ever. I don't like his storytelling choices, so I'm going to assume any film he makes will suck. I haven't liked a single film from him and I think he gets worse with every film. We'll just have to wait and see if this guy ever sees a movie set again--even if it IS in Pennsylvania.
Reply
2-17-2007 @ 3:55PM
Vince said...
Cmon people! M night does suck! Sure he takes chances and sometimes it doesn't work. Whats wrong with that? Should be just do formula work or remakes or god forbid redo Sixth Sense to death?
He should stick to directing and writing and forget about acting. That hurts his films more than anytghing else. He may not be a team player and lsiten to suggestions but who knows if its studio hacks trying to muddy the vision.
M night's got a lot going for him. I look forward to seeing each of his films. He may not be the great Orson but then again who is?
Reply
2-19-2007 @ 7:24PM
indyslf said...
Spielberg seems to have recovered nicely from the failure of 1941 and the success of E.T. Win some, lose some. MNS is young and has a long career ahead of him. His one flop at the box office probably will turn out to be just a blip. And in case anyone's wondering: no, I'm not high, but, man, do I wish I was. *sob*
Reply
3-11-2007 @ 10:28PM
john Irvine said...
Enough with the Welles and Shyamalan comparing. It's getting old. The queastion is, will a studio greenlight The Green Effect. The answer is YES but the name is changed to The Happenning. Lots of people hate Shyamalan. Why? Well his movies are slow and always have some sort of moral ground dragged into them. THANK GOD ABOVE! I'm sick of stupid studios hiring stupid directors to make stupid movies! I'm talking about the SAW and HOSTEL franchizes (Not mention the silly and sick hills have eyes! or was it ears? Or was it hacked of torsos?) Studio heads are just out for the money. Look at Disney! They've sequelled the heck out their best efforts just to grub up a few extra pennies! I think it's beyond lame for studios to greenlight scripts just to give our blood/sex saturated society something more to drool over!!! Thankyou SHYAMALAN for making decent movies. And no,... I wassn't dissapointed with lady in the water at all. It didn't come even close to scaring me, but instead it made me laugh! It wasn't supposed to be scary in the first place!! What shyamalan needs to do is fire the head of his publicity campaign! In other words,... HIMSELF! He should make the movies (Which I greatly enjoy because they actually make you THINK!) and let someone a bit more honest oversee marketting. That's my two cents. Sorry if I shouted.
Reply