Review: Ghost Rider -- Jeffrey's Review
Filed under: Action, New Releases, Sony, Theatrical Reviews, Comic/Superhero/Geek

When not performing one of his death-defying stunts, like jumping over six Black Hawk helicopters with blades whirling, Johnny Blaze (Nicolas Cage) rides without a helmet. Riding without a helmet is dangerous, but cool and sexy. Figuratively speaking, Ghost Rider the movie rides with a helmet. In fact it rides on one of those trick motorcycles, hooked up to a trailer so that actors can ride safely and still look cool. Whatever financial forces finally allowed the Marvel Comics heroes to make the transition to celluloid these past few years has had a strange effect. Some of the heroes have been treated with respect and passion, such as in the first two Spider-Man movies and the first two X-Men movies. Others have been tossed off as if some kind of deadline loomed: make these movies now or lose them forever. Daredevil (2003) and The Fantastic Four (2005) had a slapdash feel with haphazard casting and a careless choice of directors.
Whatever convinced producers that the guy who made Barbershop (2002) would be a good choice for The Fantastic Four? Or worse, that the guy who made Simon Birch (1998) could make Daredevil, and that even after Daredevil stunk up the joint that he could be trusted with Ghost Rider? Mark Steven Johnson may have learned something from those previous duds, because Ghost Rider is cleaner and lighter, and doesn't feel as if it's desperately striving for a coolness factor. It almost succumbs to its silliness. As a teenager, Blaze (Matt Long) is about to run off with his sweetheart, Roxanne Simpson (Raquel Alessi), when he finds out that his father has cancer. He makes a deal with the devil, or if you prefer, Mephistopheles (Peter Fonda), to save his father's life. But the deal also causes him to lose Roxanne.
Years later, the grown-up Blaze is an Evel Knievel-like star, and Roxanne (Eva Mendes) is a TV reporter who turns up to interview him. At the same time, his contract comes due and Mephistopheles turns Blaze into the Ghost Rider, with the purpose of killing a bad guy, Blackheart (Wes Bentley), before he can get his hands on a MacGuffin, a contract with a thousand souls in it. (It reminded me of a similar MacGuffin used in Brian De Palma's Mission: Impossible, the "NOC list.") Unfortunately, Blaze's new troubles interfere terribly with his dating life. Sam Elliot co-stars as a caretaker at a graveyard, who for some mysterious reason, knows all about the Ghost Rider phenomenon and lends a hand.
I've known many comic book nerds over the years and I have yet to run into anyone who has read "Ghost Rider," but Cage says he was a fan, and plays his role like one. He acts against a green screen for about half the running time, and though he appears lost -- howling in pain or twirling imaginary chains -- he still gives it a decent shot. It looks as if he added a few Cage-like touches to the character, such as having Blaze listen to the Carpenters before a stunt, or eating only red and white jellybeans. Mendes has even less to do, but her natural warmth adds a grin to her role. Donal Logue also appears as Blaze's manager/assistant/roadie, and he gets in a few good line deliveries: "We were riding the gravy train with biscuit wheels before you came along."
But though the film may feel effortless, by the same token it also feels as if it's not trying at all. Every plot turn is slavishly predictable, and certain lines of dialogue telegraph themselves. The CG effects are all too obvious and cheap-looking, especially the ghost head; how hard would it have been for some old-time effects guys to cook up a realistic flaming skull? Worst of all, Bentley plays his villain role with that same, one-dimensional strutting and preening that so many movie villains have; I last saw it in Blood and Chocolate, but it's everywhere. This guy is pure evil, the movie suggests, but where's the humanity or the seduction in that?
The general impression is that the producers decided that they needn't bother with anything realistic, artistic, or emotional. After all, "it's only a comic book." Comic books still provoke that kind of attitude in people, despite such spectacular achievements as A Contract with God, Maus, Watchmen, Ghost World, Understanding Comics, the books by Gilbert and Jaime Hernandez and many others. When Tim Burton made his Batman in 1989, he knew he'd have to live up to the new standard set by Frank Miller's The Dark Knight Returns. Likewise Sam Raimi with Todd McFarlane's "Venom" series in "Spider-Man."
That antagonism resulted in an artistic supercharge and turned out some good movies. With Ghost Rider, the filmmakers apparently had no idea who the fans were (except Cage), and didn't care. It was very simply the next title on the list. We still have Iron Man coming and perhaps Thor, The Avengers, Power Man, Doctor Strange or a few others untapped as of yet. Let's hope the future filmmakers involved in those projects remember to ride free and helmet-less.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-16-2007 @ 4:26PM
Rich said...
The other night, me and my gf were watching tv and a commercial for Ghost Rider came on. I knew it was coming but I asked out loud "Why Ghost Rider?". The gf asked "Why not" until I explained the basic premise of the character.
I also had to explain to her, just like movie stars there are "lists" of comic characters. Daredevil and Ghost Rider fallen in the comic book version of at least a C list celebrity if not a full on D lister.
A listers are there for a reason. They have the fans, the following and the ability to pull people in. I read a few of the Ghost Rider comics when they "reintroduced" him back in the late 80's/early 90's. The character was flat and bland and the stories were the same "Whoa is me, I am cursed. Hey look an evil doer." Even though McFarlane's Spawn character was really a knock off of GR, it was a much better character and honestly more likable.
As the studios keep pumping out movies from the C and D list of comic characters, it will only kill the genre. Just because they were in comic book doesn't mean they deserve a movie.
Reply
2-16-2007 @ 8:18PM
Colin Boyd said...
Man, what a train wreck this is. It's hard to say which effect is worse: The flaming skull or the jet black dye-job on Nic Cage to make him look less like a 50-year-old 42-year-old. Also, is he wearing a naked body suit at one point? He's completely ripped in a mirror scene, but it looks digital or something; it's decidedly unnatural. Outside of Sam Elliott, everyone is miscast. That's not a good start. The dialogue is stupid and nothing is fun or exciting. It's just a waste of time.
Reply
2-18-2007 @ 3:37AM
luis said...
"When Tim Burton made his Batman in 1989, he knew he'd have to live up to the new standard set by Frank Miller's The Dark Knight Returns. Likewise Sam Raimi with Todd McFarlane's "Venom" series in Spider-Man."
I'm not sure how much "The Dark Knight Returns" has to do with the look and feel Tim Burton employed in Batman the movie (Batman:Year One, possibly, but considering DKR isn't even canon, it seems unlikely that Burton would use that as reference).
As for Sam Raimi's take on Spider-man, Todd McFarlane may have been the artist that ushered in Spidey's new look (bigger eyes, eye-popping aerial stunts, impossibly flexible anatomy), but he had little to do with any of the actual stories. (That is, he didn't write anything any self-respecting Spider-man fan would consider important.) The look he established was continued and refined even further by Erik Larsen and then Mark Bagley, and together their work is what you would consider the "definitive" modern Spider-man. (To be fair though, it was writers like David Michelinie who really molded the Spider-man storylines to make better use of these new art styles over a 7-year run on The Amazing Spider-man comic.)
Reply
2-18-2007 @ 2:53PM
Tarheel_Mark said...
"The CG effects are all too obvious and cheap-looking, especially the ghost head"
Well, the joke's on you, pal, because that was a practical effect. That's right, they actually removed Cage's skin and muscle, doused his skull with gasoline and lit it on fire. That, my friend, is taking your craft seriously!
OK, it wasn't all practical. They did CG out his eyeballs.
Reply